Re[2]: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
On October 01, 2007 at 01:21AM Martin Hepworth wrote: On 9/30/07, Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:28:23 Derek Ragona wrote: At 03:20 PM 9/30/2007, Joe in MPLS wrote: I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw horde for mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird PDAs) for primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV scanning would be a plus too. ...jgm I use mailscanner with sendmail which uses spamassasin with clamav. All from the ports. I used Mailscanner at one time, but it is not recommended for use with Postfix because mail can be lost. It never happened to me, but it has happened to others. I believe the Postfix website mentions these problems. Mailscanner and postfix is perfect combination...no problems with the correct installation type. http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:configuration:mta:postfix:politics -- Martin Please don't Top Post. It makes following the thread more difficult than it needs to be. As for 'Mailscanner', the only real problem is that it is not on Wietse's Christmas card list. Mailscanner is regularly lambasted on the Postfix forum. You might want to ask your question regarding its suitability for your particular configuration there, and possibly on the Mailscanner forum directly. Obviously, these two opposing groups disagree as to whom to attribute any problems that arise between the interaction of these two programs. -- Gerard ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re[2]: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-( as for the whole mailscanner/postfix thing I'm very aware of the issues and the fact no-one who actually works WW with likes him ;-) -- martin On 10/1/07, Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On October 01, 2007 at 01:21AM Martin Hepworth wrote: On 9/30/07, Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:28:23 Derek Ragona wrote: At 03:20 PM 9/30/2007, Joe in MPLS wrote: I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw horde for mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird PDAs) for primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV scanning would be a plus too. ...jgm I use mailscanner with sendmail which uses spamassasin with clamav. All from the ports. I used Mailscanner at one time, but it is not recommended for use with Postfix because mail can be lost. It never happened to me, but it has happened to others. I believe the Postfix website mentions these problems. Mailscanner and postfix is perfect combination...no problems with the correct installation type. http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:configuration:mta:postfix:politics -- Martin Please don't Top Post. It makes following the thread more difficult than it needs to be. As for 'Mailscanner', the only real problem is that it is not on Wietse's Christmas card list. Mailscanner is regularly lambasted on the Postfix forum. You might want to ask your question regarding its suitability for your particular configuration there, and possibly on the Mailscanner forum directly. Obviously, these two opposing groups disagree as to whom to attribute any problems that arise between the interaction of these two programs. -- Gerard ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re[2]: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
Martin Hepworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-( as for the whole mailscanner/postfix thing I'm very aware of the issues and the fact no-one who actually works WW with likes him ;-) The Better Gmail plugin for Firefox includes an option to enable bottom posting. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4866 -Ryan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re[2]: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
On 10/1/07, Ryan Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Hepworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-( as for the whole mailscanner/postfix thing I'm very aware of the issues and the fact no-one who actually works WW with likes him ;-) The Better Gmail plugin for Firefox includes an option to enable bottom posting. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4866 -Ryan Ryan hmm ta - got that, but still doesn't BP even with the option set, I'll experiment -- martin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
