Re[4]: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

[Gerard]

On October 01, 2007 at 01:31PM Ryan Phillips wrote:


> Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-(
> > 
> > as for the whole mailscanner/postfix thing I'm very aware of the issues and
> > the fact no-one who actually works WW with likes him ;-)
> 
> The Better Gmail plugin for Firefox includes an option to enable bottom
> posting.
> 
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4866

Now GMail users will claim that they don't use Firefox and therefore
are not able to use the addon, thereby effectively enabling them to
continue to 'top post'. Heck, if they cannot scroll to the bottom of a
page or use a simple shortcut combination, I would find it hard to
believe that they could actually download and install a Firefox addon.

-- 
Gerard
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re[4]: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

[Gerard]

On October 01, 2007 at 06:39AM Martin Hepworth wrote:


> Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-(

Actually, Outlook can be configured to place replies at the bottom of
a replied to message.

I am amazed though that you have not been able to figure out how to
navigate to the bottom of a message before starting your reply.
Doesn't  or some such combination work on GMail? If not,
then why use a broken MUA anyway? Besides, how long can it take to
position the cursor at the end of a message? Certainly less time than
it took to write it.


-- 
Gerard
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"