Re: Ruby gaining weight?

2006-10-04 Thread Dimitar Vasilev
Man try portupgrade -P as a cure. It's not 100% solution, but it's better that stabbing your machines to death. Else build the package on another host and update your machines with it. For piggy questions - cannot answer. Sorry Cheers, 2006/10/2, Pete Slagle [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recent versions

Re: Ruby gaining weight? [RESOLVED]

2006-10-03 Thread Pete Slagle
Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Pete Slagle wrote: Recent versions of ruby18 seem to take more than 145 MB of virtual memory to build with portupgrade or make install clean. Karol Kwiatkowski wrote less than a week ago: # cd /usr/ports/lang/ruby18 # make -DNOPORTDOCS install That put me on the right

Re: Ruby gaining weight? [RESOLVED]

2006-10-03 Thread Karol Kwiatkowski
On 03/10/2006 11:37, Pete Slagle wrote: Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Pete Slagle wrote: Recent versions of ruby18 seem to take more than 145 MB of virtual memory to build with portupgrade or make install clean. Karol Kwiatkowski wrote less than a week ago: # cd /usr/ports/lang/ruby18 # make

Ruby gaining weight?

2006-10-02 Thread Pete Slagle
Recent versions of ruby18 seem to take more than 145 MB of virtual memory to build with portupgrade or make install clean. I have several classic boxes running bind and a mail MTA on 4.11 that are memory-limited, but otherwise work well. The main boards are maxed out at 64 MB of RAM, and they

Re: Ruby gaining weight?

2006-10-02 Thread Alex Zbyslaw
Pete Slagle wrote: Recent versions of ruby18 seem to take more than 145 MB of virtual memory to build with portupgrade or make install clean. I have several classic boxes running bind and a mail MTA on 4.11 that are memory-limited, but otherwise work well. The main boards are maxed out at 64