security run output

2009-10-09 Thread Bernt Hansson

Hello list!

I'm getting the messages below far one machine and I can't
remeber how managed to do that. I want that for my other machines
as well, but can not remeber how to activate it.


Checking for a current audit database:

Database created: Wed Oct  7 03:55:02 CEST 2009

Checking for packages with security vulnerabilities:
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: security run output

2009-10-09 Thread Sean Cavanaugh


 

 Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 13:31:56 +0200
 From: be...@bah.homeip.net
 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: security run output
 
 Hello list!
 
 I'm getting the messages below far one machine and I can't
 remeber how managed to do that. I want that for my other machines
 as well, but can not remeber how to activate it.
 
 
 Checking for a current audit database:
 
 Database created: Wed Oct 7 03:55:02 CEST 2009
 
 Checking for packages with security vulnerabilities:
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


that would most likely be the portaudit utility 

 

/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portaudit
  
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Security Run Output Setuid Differences

2007-06-06 Thread Roland Smith
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 04:11:24PM -0700, Peter Pluta wrote:
 mail.***.net setuid diffs:
 --- /var/log/setuid.today Mon May 21 03:02:30 2007
 +++ /tmp/security.wq6BsVcrSun Jun  3 03:01:48 2007
 @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
  377398 -r-sr-xr-x  2 root  wheel  5828 Jul 30 16:19:57 2006
 /usr/bin/yppasswd
  71112 -rwsr-xr-x  1 root  wheel 285580 May 20 18:23:48 2007
 /usr/local/bin/screen
  70971 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  kmem  112708 May 20 18:23:03 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/lsof
 -73170 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  142559 May 17 14:41:47 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/postdrop
 -73204 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  152477 May 17 14:41:47 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/postqueue
 +71432 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  142559 Jun  2 15:47:54 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/postdrop
 +71433 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  152477 Jun  2 15:47:54 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/postqueue
  923168 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  smmsp   5236 Jul 30 16:20:07 2006
 /usr/sbin/mailwrapper
  923264 -r-sr-x---  1 root  network11636 Jul 30 16:20:07 2006
 /usr/sbin/sliplogin
 
 I have some more, I'm starting to understand it a bit better. Basically the
 user:group id number has changed and the security run is letting me know.
 Good deal, but im still confused as to what the @@ -20,7 + 20,7 @@ and + -
 mean. Can anyone explain those? I'm curious, also why would yppasswd change
 to userid 2? I changed roots name yesterday, could that be the cause of it?

Those are a normal part of the output of the diff(1) program that generates
this.

Basically, the script /etc/periodic/security/100.chksetuid makes a list
of all setiud or setgid binaries. This list is compared with the
previous list by the diff(1) program, which shows the differences.

If you have a text file lying around, make a copy of it and change a
couple of lines in the copy. Then do 'diff -u originalfile newfile' and
you'll see how it works.

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgpaXqXRVHsG6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Security Run Output Setuid Differences

2007-06-05 Thread Peter Pluta



Roland Smith wrote:
 
 On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:59:33AM -0700, PeterPluta wrote:
 snip
  Looks like you were portupgrading around with postfix, screen and
 xterm.
  
  The output is diff(1).  See the man page for details, but it's
 basically
  showing you the difference between last night's directory listing, and
  that
  of the previous day.
  
  For more gory details, see the scripts in /etc/periodic/security, which
  are
  run every night from cron.  Some of the ports you changed resulted in
  changes to setuid/setgid programs installed on the system.  As a
 security-
  concious administrator, you should be interested in the programs on
 your
  system that have elevated privilidges, so this script is provided to
 give
  you a daily report on that.
 
 I see, so basically after reinstalling the default uid/gid of some
 programs
 changed? Is that a problem or anything? 
 
 It's not a problem. It's just something that you should be aware of from
 a security standpoint.
 
 In this case you caused it because you upgraded some ports, which is OK.
 
 But if the size, date, ownership or permissions of a binary change
 without any apparent cause, it _could_ be the work of an intruder or
 rootkit trying to backdoor your system. That's why the system checks it.
 
 In /etc/defaults/periodic.conf you see which settings there are
 concerning security, and what the defaults are. If you want to disable
 some of them, put the settings in /etc/periodic.conf with a NO value
 instead of YES. But I would recommend to leave them as they are.
 
 Roland
 -- 
 R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
 [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
 pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)
 
  
 

mail.***.net setuid diffs:
--- /var/log/setuid.today   Mon May 21 03:02:30 2007
+++ /tmp/security.wq6BsVcr  Sun Jun  3 03:01:48 2007
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 377398 -r-sr-xr-x  2 root  wheel  5828 Jul 30 16:19:57 2006
/usr/bin/yppasswd
 71112 -rwsr-xr-x  1 root  wheel 285580 May 20 18:23:48 2007
/usr/local/bin/screen
 70971 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  kmem  112708 May 20 18:23:03 2007
/usr/local/sbin/lsof
-73170 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  142559 May 17 14:41:47 2007
/usr/local/sbin/postdrop
-73204 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  152477 May 17 14:41:47 2007
/usr/local/sbin/postqueue
+71432 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  142559 Jun  2 15:47:54 2007
/usr/local/sbin/postdrop
+71433 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  152477 Jun  2 15:47:54 2007
/usr/local/sbin/postqueue
 923168 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  smmsp   5236 Jul 30 16:20:07 2006
/usr/sbin/mailwrapper
 923264 -r-sr-x---  1 root  network11636 Jul 30 16:20:07 2006
/usr/sbin/sliplogin

I have some more, I'm starting to understand it a bit better. Basically the
user:group id number has changed and the security run is letting me know.
Good deal, but im still confused as to what the @@ -20,7 + 20,7 @@ and + -
mean. Can anyone explain those? I'm curious, also why would yppasswd change
to userid 2? I changed roots name yesterday, could that be the cause of it?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Security-Run-Output-Setuid-Differences-tf3792025.html#a10979516
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Security Run Output Questions

2007-05-23 Thread PeterPluta

I see this quite regularly. What exactly is the http process doing? I'm
guessing this is the master process stopping and restarting when I rotate
logs or something. Can anyone confirm? There is usally more processes, 10-15
or more. 

kernel log messages:
+++ /tmp/security.ioLB2PiJ  Wed May 23 03:01:42 2007
+pid 30865 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Security-Run-Output-Questions-tf3806074.html#a10771250
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Security Run Output Questions

2007-05-23 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (May 23), PeterPluta said:
 I see this quite regularly. What exactly is the http process doing?
 I'm guessing this is the master process stopping and restarting when
 I rotate logs or something. Can anyone confirm? There is usally more
 processes, 10-15 or more.
 
 kernel log messages:
 +++ /tmp/security.ioLB2PiJWed May 23 03:01:42 2007
 +pid 30865 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4

It's crashing :)

 4 SIGILL   create core imageillegal instruction

-- 
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Security Run Output Questions

2007-05-23 Thread Roland Smith
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 12:40:19PM -0700, PeterPluta wrote:
 
 I see this quite regularly. What exactly is the http process doing? I'm
 guessing this is the master process stopping and restarting when I rotate
 logs or something. Can anyone confirm? There is usally more processes, 10-15
 or more. 
 
 kernel log messages:
 +++ /tmp/security.ioLB2PiJWed May 23 03:01:42 2007
 +pid 30865 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4

According to signal(3), signal 4 is SIGILL; illegal instruction.

Not sure what triggers that. Maybe a stack overflow bug that writes a
bogus value to a return address?

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgpkhw8noG6Vu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Security Run Output Questions

2007-05-23 Thread Peter Pluta



Dan Nelson wrote:
 
 In the last episode (May 23), PeterPluta said:
 I see this quite regularly. What exactly is the http process doing?
 I'm guessing this is the master process stopping and restarting when
 I rotate logs or something. Can anyone confirm? There is usally more
 processes, 10-15 or more.
 
 kernel log messages:
 +++ /tmp/security.ioLB2PiJ   Wed May 23 03:01:42 2007
 +pid 30865 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4
 
 It's crashing :)
 
  4 SIGILL   create core imageillegal instruction
 
 -- 
   Dan Nelson
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

Ahh I see, so this isn't a good thing. I'm running Apahe with mod_php. I
don't see why it would be crashing, unless one of the web apps is buggy. 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Security-Run-Output-Questions-tf3806074.html#a10772295
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Security Run Output Questions

2007-05-23 Thread Garrett Cooper

Roland Smith wrote:

On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 12:40:19PM -0700, PeterPluta wrote:

I see this quite regularly. What exactly is the http process doing? I'm
guessing this is the master process stopping and restarting when I rotate
logs or something. Can anyone confirm? There is usally more processes, 10-15
or more. 


kernel log messages:
+++ /tmp/security.ioLB2PiJ  Wed May 23 03:01:42 2007
+pid 30865 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4


According to signal(3), signal 4 is SIGILL; illegal instruction.

Not sure what triggers that. Maybe a stack overflow bug that writes a
bogus value to a return address?

Roland


Are you running CURRENT and did you update to GCC 4.2 and install httpd 
lately? If so, you need to read a few threads on the current@ list 
pertaining to GCC 4.2 written in the past 1-2 weeks.


-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Security Run Output Setuid Differences

2007-05-21 Thread PeterPluta

I did a lot of port hacking yesterday. By that I mean screwing up and redoing
lots of things. Anyway, I woke up today to find this email in my inbox. 

Checking setuid files and devices:

mail.placidpublishing.net setuid diffs:
--- /var/log/setuid.today   Fri May 18 03:02:47 2007
+++ /tmp/security.207RUJmY  Mon May 21 03:02:30 2007
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
 70745 -r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel 21792 Jul 30 16:19:55 2006 /sbin/ping
 70746 -r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel 28660 Jul 30 16:19:55 2006 /sbin/ping6
 70721 -r-sr-x---  1 root  operator  10148 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
/sbin/shutdown
-165583 -rws--x--x  1 root  wheel 268432 Apr 14 14:05:10 2007
/usr/X11R6/bin/xterm
 377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
/usr/bin/chfn
 377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
/usr/bin/chpass
 377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
/usr/bin/chsh
@@ -19,9 +18,9 @@
 377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
/usr/bin/ypchpass
 377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
/usr/bin/ypchsh
 377398 -r-sr-xr-x  2 root  wheel  5828 Jul 30 16:19:57 2006
/usr/bin/yppasswd
-72750 -rwsr-xr-x  1 root  wheel 285580 Nov  2 01:21:29 2006
/usr/local/bin/screen
-71569 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  kmem  112708 Feb  3 17:17:26 2007
/usr/local/sbin/lsof
-71923 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  142559 May 17 14:41:47 2007
/usr/local/sbin/postdrop
-71924 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  152477 May 17 14:41:47 2007
/usr/local/sbin/postqueue
+71112 -rwsr-xr-x  1 root  wheel 285580 May 20 18:23:48 2007
/usr/local/bin/screen
+70971 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  kmem  112708 May 20 18:23:03 2007
/usr/local/sbin/lsof
+73170 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  142559 May 17 14:41:47 2007
/usr/local/sbin/postdrop
+73204 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  152477 May 17 14:41:47 2007
/usr/local/sbin/postqueue
 923168 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  smmsp   5236 Jul 30 16:20:07 2006
/usr/sbin/mailwrapper
 923264 -r-sr-x---  1 root  network11636 Jul 30 16:20:07 2006
/usr/sbin/sliplogin


What exactly does this all mean? Specifically the @@ -19,9 +18,9 @@ stuff.
Also, why did this all of a sudden appear?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Security-Run-Output-Setuid-Differences-tf3792025.html#a10724342
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Security Run Output Setuid Differences

2007-05-21 Thread Bill Moran
On Mon, 21 May 2007 11:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
PeterPluta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 I did a lot of port hacking yesterday. By that I mean screwing up and redoing
 lots of things. Anyway, I woke up today to find this email in my inbox. 
 
 Checking setuid files and devices:
 
 mail.placidpublishing.net setuid diffs:
 --- /var/log/setuid.today Fri May 18 03:02:47 2007
 +++ /tmp/security.207RUJmYMon May 21 03:02:30 2007
 @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
  70745 -r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel 21792 Jul 30 16:19:55 2006 /sbin/ping
  70746 -r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel 28660 Jul 30 16:19:55 2006 /sbin/ping6
  70721 -r-sr-x---  1 root  operator  10148 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
 /sbin/shutdown
 -165583 -rws--x--x  1 root  wheel 268432 Apr 14 14:05:10 2007
 /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm
  377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
 /usr/bin/chfn
  377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
 /usr/bin/chpass
  377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
 /usr/bin/chsh
 @@ -19,9 +18,9 @@
  377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
 /usr/bin/ypchpass
  377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
 /usr/bin/ypchsh
  377398 -r-sr-xr-x  2 root  wheel  5828 Jul 30 16:19:57 2006
 /usr/bin/yppasswd
 -72750 -rwsr-xr-x  1 root  wheel 285580 Nov  2 01:21:29 2006
 /usr/local/bin/screen
 -71569 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  kmem  112708 Feb  3 17:17:26 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/lsof
 -71923 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  142559 May 17 14:41:47 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/postdrop
 -71924 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  152477 May 17 14:41:47 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/postqueue
 +71112 -rwsr-xr-x  1 root  wheel 285580 May 20 18:23:48 2007
 /usr/local/bin/screen
 +70971 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  kmem  112708 May 20 18:23:03 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/lsof
 +73170 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  142559 May 17 14:41:47 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/postdrop
 +73204 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  152477 May 17 14:41:47 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/postqueue
  923168 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  smmsp   5236 Jul 30 16:20:07 2006
 /usr/sbin/mailwrapper
  923264 -r-sr-x---  1 root  network11636 Jul 30 16:20:07 2006
 /usr/sbin/sliplogin
 
 
 What exactly does this all mean? Specifically the @@ -19,9 +18,9 @@ stuff.
 Also, why did this all of a sudden appear?

Looks like you were portupgrading around with postfix, screen and xterm.

The output is diff(1).  See the man page for details, but it's basically
showing you the difference between last night's directory listing, and that
of the previous day.

For more gory details, see the scripts in /etc/periodic/security, which are
run every night from cron.  Some of the ports you changed resulted in
changes to setuid/setgid programs installed on the system.  As a security-
concious administrator, you should be interested in the programs on your
system that have elevated privilidges, so this script is provided to give
you a daily report on that.

-- 
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Security Run Output Setuid Differences

2007-05-21 Thread PeterPluta



Bill Moran wrote:
 
 On Mon, 21 May 2007 11:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
 PeterPluta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 I did a lot of port hacking yesterday. By that I mean screwing up and
 redoing
 lots of things. Anyway, I woke up today to find this email in my inbox. 
 
 Checking setuid files and devices:
 
 mail.placidpublishing.net setuid diffs:
 --- /var/log/setuid.todayFri May 18 03:02:47 2007
 +++ /tmp/security.207RUJmY   Mon May 21 03:02:30 2007
 @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
  70745 -r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel 21792 Jul 30 16:19:55 2006
 /sbin/ping
  70746 -r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel 28660 Jul 30 16:19:55 2006
 /sbin/ping6
  70721 -r-sr-x---  1 root  operator  10148 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
 /sbin/shutdown
 -165583 -rws--x--x  1 root  wheel 268432 Apr 14 14:05:10 2007
 /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm
  377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
 /usr/bin/chfn
  377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
 /usr/bin/chpass
  377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
 /usr/bin/chsh
 @@ -19,9 +18,9 @@
  377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
 /usr/bin/ypchpass
  377219 -r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel 17532 Jul 30 16:19:56 2006
 /usr/bin/ypchsh
  377398 -r-sr-xr-x  2 root  wheel  5828 Jul 30 16:19:57 2006
 /usr/bin/yppasswd
 -72750 -rwsr-xr-x  1 root  wheel 285580 Nov  2 01:21:29 2006
 /usr/local/bin/screen
 -71569 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  kmem  112708 Feb  3 17:17:26 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/lsof
 -71923 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  142559 May 17 14:41:47 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/postdrop
 -71924 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  152477 May 17 14:41:47 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/postqueue
 +71112 -rwsr-xr-x  1 root  wheel 285580 May 20 18:23:48 2007
 /usr/local/bin/screen
 +70971 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  kmem  112708 May 20 18:23:03 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/lsof
 +73170 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  142559 May 17 14:41:47 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/postdrop
 +73204 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  maildrop  152477 May 17 14:41:47 2007
 /usr/local/sbin/postqueue
  923168 -rwxr-sr-x  1 root  smmsp   5236 Jul 30 16:20:07 2006
 /usr/sbin/mailwrapper
  923264 -r-sr-x---  1 root  network11636 Jul 30 16:20:07 2006
 /usr/sbin/sliplogin
 
 
 What exactly does this all mean? Specifically the @@ -19,9 +18,9 @@
 stuff.
 Also, why did this all of a sudden appear?
 
 Looks like you were portupgrading around with postfix, screen and xterm.
 
 The output is diff(1).  See the man page for details, but it's basically
 showing you the difference between last night's directory listing, and
 that
 of the previous day.
 
 For more gory details, see the scripts in /etc/periodic/security, which
 are
 run every night from cron.  Some of the ports you changed resulted in
 changes to setuid/setgid programs installed on the system.  As a security-
 concious administrator, you should be interested in the programs on your
 system that have elevated privilidges, so this script is provided to give
 you a daily report on that.
 
 -- 
 Bill Moran
 Potential Technologies
 http://www.potentialtech.com
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


I see, so basically after reinstalling the default uid/gid of some programs
changed? Is that a problem or anything? 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Security-Run-Output-Setuid-Differences-tf3792025.html#a10724835
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Security Run Output Setuid Differences

2007-05-21 Thread Roland Smith
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:59:33AM -0700, PeterPluta wrote:
snip
  Looks like you were portupgrading around with postfix, screen and xterm.
  
  The output is diff(1).  See the man page for details, but it's basically
  showing you the difference between last night's directory listing, and
  that
  of the previous day.
  
  For more gory details, see the scripts in /etc/periodic/security, which
  are
  run every night from cron.  Some of the ports you changed resulted in
  changes to setuid/setgid programs installed on the system.  As a security-
  concious administrator, you should be interested in the programs on your
  system that have elevated privilidges, so this script is provided to give
  you a daily report on that.
 
 I see, so basically after reinstalling the default uid/gid of some programs
 changed? Is that a problem or anything? 

It's not a problem. It's just something that you should be aware of from
a security standpoint.

In this case you caused it because you upgraded some ports, which is OK.

But if the size, date, ownership or permissions of a binary change
without any apparent cause, it _could_ be the work of an intruder or
rootkit trying to backdoor your system. That's why the system checks it.

In /etc/defaults/periodic.conf you see which settings there are
concerning security, and what the defaults are. If you want to disable
some of them, put the settings in /etc/periodic.conf with a NO value
instead of YES. But I would recommend to leave them as they are.

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgp97mviUg63t.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: weird messages in daily security run output mails

2007-05-19 Thread Björn König
Jan L. Nauta schrieb:

 [...]
 +NMI 2ISAN MI ISA 38, EIS3A8,  E0I
 +S
 +A 0
 +2N2NMMII I SAIS A 38, E3I8S, AEI S0A NMI ISA 38, EISA 0 kernel trap
 +19 with interrupts disabled NMI ISA 28, EISA 0 NMI 2INSAM I ISA 28,
 +EISA2 08
 [...]
 g_vfs_done():mirror/gm0s1f[READ(offset=356486479872, length=16384)]error
 [...]

That looks like a hardware error. If you don't already have an assumption
I would try to find the broken hardware by testing the hard disks
separately, e.g. by reading the entire disk and watching the log: dd
if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/zero bs=64k and tail -f /var/log/messages.

Regards
Björn


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


weird messages in daily security run output mails

2007-04-24 Thread Jan L. Nauta
Hi,

 

SMP FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (i386), latest version via freebsd-update, on a
PentiumD based server with two ide drives running under gmirror.

 

Recently I've been getting the following messages in my daily security run
output mails:

 

SNIP

+NMI INSAM I IS2A 8, EISA 20

+8,

+22NMIN MISI AI SA 38,3 8,E IESAIS A0

+NMI2 NIMSIA  ISA 28,2 8EI, SEA I0S

+A 0

+NMI ISA N2M8I,  ISEIA SA 0

+28, EISA 0

+NMI 2ISAN MI ISA 38, EIS3A8,  E0I

+S

+A 0

+2N2NMMII I SAIS A 38, E3I8S, AEI S0A NMI ISA 38, EISA 0 kernel trap 

+19 with interrupts disabled NMI ISA 28, EISA 0 NMI 2INSAM I ISA 28, 

+EISA2 08

/SNIP

 

Sometimes with message like this embedded:

 

SNIP

g_vfs_done():mirror/gm0s1f[READ(offset=356486479872, length=16384)]error = 5

/SNIP

 

By now the mail is about 40K. Does anybody have an idea what this means and
what's causing it?

 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


weird messages in daily security run output mails

2007-04-24 Thread Jan L. Nauta
Hi,

 

SMP FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (i386), latest version via freebsd-update, on a
PentiumD based server with two ide drives running under gmirror.

 

Recently I've been getting the following messages in my daily security run
output mails:

 

SNIP

+NMI INSAM I IS2A 8, EISA 20

+8,

+22NMIN MISI AI SA 38,3 8,E IESAIS A0

+NMI2 NIMSIA  ISA 28,2 8EI, SEA I0S

+A 0

+NMI ISA N2M8I,  ISEIA SA 0

+28, EISA 0

+NMI 2ISAN MI ISA 38, EIS3A8,  E0I

+S

+A 0

+2N2NMMII I SAIS A 38, E3I8S, AEI S0A NMI ISA 38, EISA 0 kernel trap 

+19 with interrupts disabled NMI ISA 28, EISA 0 NMI 2INSAM I ISA 28, 

+EISA2 08

/SNIP

 

Sometimes with message like this embedded:

 

SNIP

g_vfs_done():mirror/gm0s1f[READ(offset=356486479872, length=16384)]error = 5

/SNIP

 

By now the mail is about 40K. Does anybody have an idea what this means and
what's causing it?

 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Fw: lothlorien.nagual.nl security run output

2006-08-30 Thread nicky
My guess is that there is nothing to be worried about, however i could 
be wrong. Let me explain..


This morning i received the same kind of message in my security run 
output (yesterday i've updated all my ports):


Checking setuid files and devices:

nlp setuid diffs:
--- /var/log/setuid.today   Fri Aug 25 08:12:19 2006
+++ /tmp/security.Ia2whJjb  Wed Aug 30 08:15:56 2006
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
49434 -r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  23648 Aug 22 11:05:26 2006 /sbin/ping
49435 -r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  31924 Aug 22 11:05:26 2006 /sbin/ping6
49448 -r-sr-x---  1 root  operator   10308 Aug 22 11:05:27 2006 /sbin/shutdown
-7795756 -rws--x--x  1 root  wheel  2069783 Aug 24 09:17:07 2006 
/usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg
-7795717 -rws--x--x  1 root  wheel   303748 Aug 24 09:03:51 2006 
/usr/X11R6/bin/xterm
+7795722 -rws--x--x  1 root  wheel  2069783 Aug 29 13:08:10 2006 
/usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg
+7796599 -rws--x--x  1 root  wheel   305764 Aug 29 12:57:30 2006 
/usr/X11R6/bin/xterm
1625095 -r-sr-xr-x  4 root  wheel  22260 Aug 22 11:05:50 2006 /usr/bin/at
1625095 -r-sr-xr-x  4 root  wheel  22260 Aug 22 11:05:50 2006 /usr/bin/atq
1625095 -r-sr-xr-x  4 root  wheel  22260 Aug 22 11:05:50 2006 /usr/bin/atrm

If i look at my message, i see that lines between 3 to 8 have been changed. 
After a manual diff between /var/log/setuid.today/yesterday i only get the xorg 
related lines. Which is correct, since i remember seeing some xorg ports  being 
updated.

In your message you state, Begin forwarded message [some Xorg update warnings 
deleted]:

Isn't it so that in your message, lines 3 to 12 are just port related binaries? (i assume xorg related). Meaning that ping/ping6, etc aren't updated at all. At least i don't see the +/- signs infront of your ping/ping6 ones. 

My guess. 


Greets.
Nick



dick hoogendijk wrote:

I'm a little worried after reading the security output this morning.
It seems some files [ping, ping6, shutdown, at, atq and atrm] have
setuid diffs. I really don't know why this could have happened.
I updated some ports yesterday, but I don't think any port writes
in /sbin (?)
Could someboddy advice me on what can have happened?

Begin forwarded message [some Xorg update warnings deleted]:

Checking setuid files and devices:
Checking setuid files and devices:

lothlorien.nagual.nl setuid diffs:
--- /var/log/setuid.today   Mon Aug 14 03:03:25 2006
+++ /tmp/security.aJbHsCR6  Sun Aug 27 03:03:22 2006
@@ -3,12 +3,12 @@
23637 -r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  21792 May 12 21:47:15
2006 /sbin/ping
23638 -r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  28660 May 12
21:47:15 2006 /sbin/ping6
23651 -r-sr-x---  1 root  operator   10148
May 12 21:47:17 2006 /sbin/shutdown
7042059 -r-sr-xr-x  4 root  wheel  20948
May 12 21:48:10 2006 /usr/bin/at
7042059 -r-sr-xr-x  4 root
wheel 20948 May 12 21:48:10 2006 /usr/bin/atq
7042059 -r-sr-xr-x  4
root wheel 20948 May 12 21:48:10 2006 /usr/bin/atrm

  


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Fw: lothlorien.nagual.nl security run output

2006-08-30 Thread dick hoogendijk
On 30 Aug nicky wrote:
 In your message you state, Begin forwarded message [some Xorg update
 warnings deleted]:
 
 Isn't it so that in your message, lines 3 to 12 are just port related 
 binaries? (i assume xorg related). Meaning that ping/ping6, etc aren't 
 updated at all. At least i don't see the +/- signs infront of your 
 ping/ping6 ones. 

You are absolutely right. I'm blushing, I really am. Jee, I totally missed
the + / - signs. I overlooked and worried about the 'wrong' files.
It was Xorg that was updated. Just like you have done and seen ;-)
Thanks for the response.

Remains one question (too me): what program would be best to have as a
system integraty checker? Shamhein, Osiris or what?

-- 
dick -- http://nagual.nl/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 6.1 +++ The Power to Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Fw: lothlorien.nagual.nl security run output

2006-08-29 Thread dick hoogendijk
On 28 Aug David Robillard wrote:

 Did you reinstall the entire OS _before_ you installed Osiris?  Did you
 find out why your SUID files had changed in the first place?

No. I did a diff with the same files on other freebsd-6.1 machines which
I'm absolutely certain are not compromised. The files where exactly the
same. I use the same port collections and always portupgrade the machines
at the same time. So I'm quite sure it must have been some software
packages that changed the suid bit. It's too much work to find out exactly
which ones, given the fact it's not that important after all.

 If not, then your base Osiris database might contain already
 compromised software. Which makes Osiris useless...

I know..

 Use the default configuration for this OS (yes/no) yes
   configuration (default.freebsd) has been pushed
 
 Nothing happens.. (as it seems..)

 I had the same problem with FreeBSD 5.3 and then moved to 6.1 which
 cleared this problem. I suspect it has to do with network timeouts that
 have been changed via sysctl.conf(5). Have you done any modifications to
 your sysctl.conf file?

I run 6.1 so it's weird that nothing happens..
I did not change a thing in sysctl.conf except for some hw.snd settings.
They can't be blamed I suppose ;-)

Maybe you have some clues.

-- 
dick -- http://nagual.nl/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 6.1 +++ The Power to Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Fw: lothlorien.nagual.nl security run output

2006-08-28 Thread David Robillard

I'm a little worried after reading the security output this morning.
It seems some files [ping, ping6, shutdown, at, atq and atrm] have
setuid diffs. I really don't know why this could have happened.
I updated some ports yesterday, but I don't think any port writes
in /sbin (?)

Could someboddy advice me on what can have happened?


What ports have you updated? You can check if any of them has
installed new files in /sbin by running `pkg_info -L
your_updated_port-version`. See the -L option of pkg_info(1) in the
man page 
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=pkg_infoapropos=0sektion=0manpath=FreeBSD+6.1-RELEASEformat=html

You can also consider installing a Host Based Integrity Monitoring
software. I use Osiris which is quite simple to setup and administer.
It's already in the ports as security/osiris which you can get there:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/security/osiris/pkg-descr.

Of course, don't install osiris on a machine which you're not sure if
it has been tampered with, it would defeat the purpose... You can also
take a look at other integrity checking software such as Samhain,
Tripwire or aide.

Regards,

David
--
David Robillard
UNIX systems administrator  Oracle DBA
CISSP, RHCE  Sun Certified Security Administrator
Montreal: +1 514 966 0122
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fw: lothlorien.nagual.nl security run output

2006-08-27 Thread dick hoogendijk
I'm a little worried after reading the security output this morning.
It seems some files [ping, ping6, shutdown, at, atq and atrm] have
setuid diffs. I really don't know why this could have happened.
I updated some ports yesterday, but I don't think any port writes
in /sbin (?)
Could someboddy advice me on what can have happened?

Begin forwarded message [some Xorg update warnings deleted]:

Checking setuid files and devices:
Checking setuid files and devices:

lothlorien.nagual.nl setuid diffs:
--- /var/log/setuid.today   Mon Aug 14 03:03:25 2006
+++ /tmp/security.aJbHsCR6  Sun Aug 27 03:03:22 2006
@@ -3,12 +3,12 @@
23637 -r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  21792 May 12 21:47:15
2006 /sbin/ping
23638 -r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  28660 May 12
21:47:15 2006 /sbin/ping6
23651 -r-sr-x---  1 root  operator   10148
May 12 21:47:17 2006 /sbin/shutdown
7042059 -r-sr-xr-x  4 root  wheel  20948
May 12 21:48:10 2006 /usr/bin/at
7042059 -r-sr-xr-x  4 root
wheel 20948 May 12 21:48:10 2006 /usr/bin/atq
7042059 -r-sr-xr-x  4
root wheel 20948 May 12 21:48:10 2006 /usr/bin/atrm

-- 
dick -- http://nagual.nl/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 6.1 +++ The Power to Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Fw: lothlorien.nagual.nl security run output

2006-08-27 Thread Bill Moran

dick hoogendijk wrote:

I'm a little worried after reading the security output this morning.
It seems some files [ping, ping6, shutdown, at, atq and atrm] have
setuid diffs. I really don't know why this could have happened.
I updated some ports yesterday, but I don't think any port writes
in /sbin (?)
Could someboddy advice me on what can have happened?
  


If you didn't do an installworld or any other upgrade, then something is 
wrong.


They could be trojaned as part of a breakin, you you could be 
experiencing disk corruption.



Begin forwarded message [some Xorg update warnings deleted]:

Checking setuid files and devices:
Checking setuid files and devices:

lothlorien.nagual.nl setuid diffs:
--- /var/log/setuid.today   Mon Aug 14 03:03:25 2006
+++ /tmp/security.aJbHsCR6  Sun Aug 27 03:03:22 2006
@@ -3,12 +3,12 @@
23637 -r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  21792 May 12 21:47:15
2006 /sbin/ping
23638 -r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  28660 May 12
21:47:15 2006 /sbin/ping6
23651 -r-sr-x---  1 root  operator   10148
May 12 21:47:17 2006 /sbin/shutdown
7042059 -r-sr-xr-x  4 root  wheel  20948
May 12 21:48:10 2006 /usr/bin/at
7042059 -r-sr-xr-x  4 root
wheel 20948 May 12 21:48:10 2006 /usr/bin/atq
7042059 -r-sr-xr-x  4
root wheel 20948 May 12 21:48:10 2006 /usr/bin/atrm

  


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Security Run Output E-mail

2006-07-21 Thread jan gestre

On 7/20/06, PATRICK CARTER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I'm relatively ne to FreeBSD (~6 months of usage) and I have been
administering my own system for approximately the last 2 months.  Recently
my system has received many ssh login attempts on standard user accounts as
someone has been attempting to break into my system.  I usually read the
Security Run Output e-mails to see if the attacker(s) had made any headway,
and took necessary precautions (limiting ssh logins etc).  However, last
week (after it seemed that the attacks had let up somewhat) I stopped
receiving the e-mails (as well as the daily run output e-mails).  I still
read the auth.log file to see login information and it did not appear as
though anyone had successfully managed to break into the system.  Today the
both sets of e-mails started again and I received the e-mails for today and
yesterday (I am still missing 5 days worth and one weekly run output).  I
was wondering if anyone might know how to ensure that I continue to receive
these e-mails without interrupti
on.

If it matters (and I suspect it does) I have all my root e-mails aliased
to a locked, nologin dummy account that forwards e-mail to my account, my
boss' account, and retains a copy in the dummy account (.forward was not
working to forward root's mail).  Root's mail client is set to read the
dummy account inbox as well as anything that somehow winds up in the regular
root mailbox.  This setup worked fine until the e-mails stopped last week
(none of the listed accounts received the e-mail).

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

those script kiddies do let up sometimes you know :D , using brute force i

guess, as long as your user's passwords aren't dictionary words then you
have nothing to worry. and also set the Allowusers directive allowing only
admins.

HTH
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Security Run Output E-mail

2006-07-20 Thread PATRICK CARTER
I'm relatively ne to FreeBSD (~6 months of usage) and I have been administering 
my own system for approximately the last 2 months.  Recently my system has 
received many ssh login attempts on standard user accounts as someone has been 
attempting to break into my system.  I usually read the Security Run Output 
e-mails to see if the attacker(s) had made any headway, and took necessary 
precautions (limiting ssh logins etc).  However, last week (after it seemed 
that the attacks had let up somewhat) I stopped receiving the e-mails (as well 
as the daily run output e-mails).  I still read the auth.log file to see login 
information and it did not appear as though anyone had successfully managed to 
break into the system.  Today the both sets of e-mails started again and I 
received the e-mails for today and yesterday (I am still missing 5 days worth 
and one weekly run output).  I was wondering if anyone might know how to ensure 
that I continue to receive these e-mails without interrupti
on.

If it matters (and I suspect it does) I have all my root e-mails aliased to a 
locked, nologin dummy account that forwards e-mail to my account, my boss' 
account, and retains a copy in the dummy account (.forward was not working to 
forward root's mail).  Root's mail client is set to read the dummy account 
inbox as well as anything that somehow winds up in the regular root mailbox.  
This setup worked fine until the e-mails stopped last week (none of the listed 
accounts received the e-mail).

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

--Patrick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Security Run Output

2006-04-26 Thread fbsd
The daily security email to root all ways lists a count of blocked
packets
if you have one of the three firewall activated.

So what you are seeing is informational and nothing to be concerned
about unless you did not active the ipfilter firewall.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bryan Curl
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 6:18 PM
To: freebsd-questions
Subject: Security Run Output


I get this or similar message in my Security Run Output every day.

Is it something to be concerned with?

lnut.bc.net ipf denied packets:
+++ /tmp/security.FsPOiq0v  Fri Apr 21 03:03:51 2006
+1 @4 block out log first quick on dc0 all
+47571 @14 block in log first quick on dc0 all


--
--
Bryan
bc3910 'at' gmail 'dot' com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Security Run Output

2006-04-25 Thread Bryan Curl
I get this or similar message in my Security Run Output every day.

Is it something to be concerned with?

lnut.bc.net ipf denied packets:
+++ /tmp/security.FsPOiq0v  Fri Apr 21 03:03:51 2006
+1 @4 block out log first quick on dc0 all
+47571 @14 block in log first quick on dc0 all


--
--
Bryan
bc3910 'at' gmail 'dot' com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Trouble reading the nightly security run output report

2005-02-02 Thread Tim Hogan
OK, so every night the default install of FreeBSD generates a security
run output report for IPF denied packets.  Here is a sample report;

 221143 @2 block out log quick on dc0 from any to any head 15
 92733 @2 block in log quick on dc0 from any to any head 10
 20 @8 block in log quick on dc0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any group 10

That's it.  I am looking at this and trying to figure out if it is useful
and just what are those numbers for?  I have IPF creating a log entry for
all of the dropped packets, but when I look at the logs I can't match
those numbers at all.  In fact, if I do a 'wc -l' on the log file I get a
count of 10,780 lines.  If I take into account the log entries that have a
consecutive count logged I come up with 11,422.  Not even close the
numbers listed above.

So just what does this report mean and is there a better tool to run that
would give me a nightly report of total drops and perhaps the top ten
offenders and why?

Thanks
Tim


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: daily security run output messages

2004-12-06 Thread Kjell Midtseter
On Sunday,  5 December 2004 at 11:33:23 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
 Kjell Midtseter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  List members!
  
  My daily security run output contains lots of kernel log messages like the 
  following:
   Connection attempt to UDP 10.0.0.10:1099 from 217.13.4.21:53
   Connection attempt to UDP 10.0.0.10:3204 from 193.75.75.193:53
  --
  What are the significanse of these messages?
  
  My ipf firewall contains:
  # domain name servers (dns)
  pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from 217.13.4.21/32 to any port = 53 keep 
  state
  --
  Should I make any changes to my firewall settings?
 
 Looks like a NAT problem; is your 10.0.0.10 address supposed to be
 visible to the ISP's DNS server?

The ISP's DNS server should not be able to see my 10.0.0.10 address.
I am talking to my ISP through a Cisco 677i modem. The modem IP is 10.0.0.1
NATing can not be turned off (?) in the modem.
My R4.10 firewall talks to the modem using IP 10.0.0.10 and the firewall is 
doing NAT also.
My internal network is in the 192.168.1.nn range.

Regards from Kjell
 
 -- 
 Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
   http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: daily security run output messages

2004-12-05 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Kjell Midtseter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 List members!
 
 My daily security run output contains lots of kernel log messages like the 
 following:
  Connection attempt to UDP 10.0.0.10:1099 from 217.13.4.21:53
  Connection attempt to UDP 10.0.0.10:3204 from 193.75.75.193:53
 --
 What are the significanse of these messages?
 
 My ipf firewall contains:
 # domain name servers (dns)
 pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from 217.13.4.21/32 to any port = 53 keep state
 --
 Should I make any changes to my firewall settings?

Looks like a NAT problem; is your 10.0.0.10 address supposed to be
visible to the ISP's DNS server?

-- 
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


daily security run output messages

2004-12-02 Thread Kjell Midtseter
List members!

My daily security run output contains lots of kernel log messages like the 
following:
 Connection attempt to UDP 10.0.0.10:1099 from 217.13.4.21:53
 Connection attempt to UDP 10.0.0.10:3204 from 193.75.75.193:53
--
What are the significanse of these messages?

My ipf firewall contains:
# domain name servers (dns)
pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from 217.13.4.21/32 to any port = 53 keep state
--
Should I make any changes to my firewall settings?

Regards from Kjell

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


GEOM: create disk during runtime? (security run output)

2004-11-19 Thread Duane Winner
Hello,
I'm hoping somebody on this list can shed some light on this.
My boss sent me a copy of his daily cron security run output, which 
contained this:

   localhost.local kernel log messages:
 GEOM: create disk ad0 dp=0xc6b77d60
 GEOM: create disk cd0 dp=0xc69a8600
We're all running FreeBSD 5.2.1-p12. I've seen the GEOM: create disk 
messages plenty of times on boot and in my dmesg's, but never really 
paid much attention to them, since I don't really understand how GEOM 
works or how to interpret these kinds of messages.

But I don't recall ever seeing it in a security run cronjob.
My first question is why is this happening during a security run 
cronjob? If this system is already booted and running, why is GEOM 
creating disks?

My second question is is this something bad? Is it a red flag?
The only reasonable (and non-threatening) answer I could come up with is 
maybe it's because the machine went into or came out of suspend mode 
near the time the cronjob ran. (APM)

The bottom line is I don't really know anything about GEOM, and would 
like to know what this means so preventative action can be taken if 
necessary.

Thanks for any info,
Duane
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


security run output question (GEOM: create disk)

2004-11-18 Thread Duane Winner
Hello,
Does anybody know what this means when I see this in a daily security 
run output?:

locahost.local kernel log messages:
GEOM: create disk ad0 dp=0xc6b77d60
GEOM: create disk cd0 dp=0xc69a8600
I don't recall ever seeing this in my daily outputs, but my boss sent me 
an email with this and he wants to know what it means.

If I do a 'dmesg' on my computer, I also get:
GEOM: create disk ad0 dp=0xc6b63160
GEOM: create disk cd0 dp=0xc6983e00
What does this mean, and what does it mean when it shows up in the 
security run output?

Thanks for any info.
-Duane
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Strange kernel log message from security run output

2004-09-01 Thread Charles M. Gerungan
[fqdn] kernel log messages:

 'M-[M-c^_M-'M-ZM-c^_M-KM-ZM-c^_M-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-^M-+^ZM-|M-,^P=M^MCM-ZM-c^_M-3M-*M-b^_M-KM-ZM-c^_M-gM-ZM-c^_^SM-M-c^_M-'M-ZM-c^_M-KM-ZM-c^_^HM^_M-ZM-c^_^HM-/M-ZM-c^_M-JM-)M-b^_M-'[EMAIL
  PROTECTED]'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 9M-c^_M-x8M-c^_M^PM- [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] M-b^_?M-M-c^_M-,[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/M-c^_^DM-+^H^Z^BM-b^_fM-+^HH^YM-c^_'^_M-b^_p^_M-b^_M-^_M-b^_k
 M-b^_M-,)M-c^_M^?'^_M-b^_p^_M-b^_M-^_M-b^_k
 M-b^_M-t/M-c^_M-dM-b^_
 ]M-b^_^B^AM-8M-]M-c^_KOM-b^_lOM-b^_M^JOM-b^_M-0OM-b^_KOM-b^_lOM-b^_M^JOM-b^_M-0OM-b^_M-FYM-b^_M-XYM-b^_M-jYM-b^_ZM-b^_M^?M-S[M-b^_M-b^_M-#M-b^_^BM-,M-]M-c^_Copyright
 (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project.
  
What is FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE trying to tell me? I've added IPF to my kernel.

-- 
Regards, Charles.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Strange kernel log message from security run output

2004-09-01 Thread Joe O
This junk is normally seen in dmesg if you used the interactive kernel
configurator at the last boot.

On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Charles M. Gerungan wrote:

 [fqdn] kernel log messages:

  'M-[M-c^_M-'M-ZM-c^_M-KM-ZM-c^_M-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-,^P=M^MM-^M-+^ZM-|M-,^P=M^MCM-ZM-c^_M-3M-*M-b^_M-KM-ZM-c^_M-gM-ZM-c^_^SM-M-c^_M-'M-ZM-c^_M-KM-ZM-c^_^HM^_M-ZM-c^_^HM-/M-ZM-c^_M-JM-)M-b^_M-'[EMAIL
   PROTECTED]'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  9M-c^_M-x8M-c^_M^PM- [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] M-b^_?M-M-c^_M-,[EMAIL 
  PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL 
  PROTECTED]/M-c^_^DM-+^H^Z^BM-b^_fM-+^HH^YM-c^_'^_M-b^_p^_M-b^_M-^_M-b^_k
  M-b^_M-,)M-c^_M^?'^_M-b^_p^_M-b^_M-^_M-b^_k
  M-b^_M-t/M-c^_M-dM-b^_
  ]M-b^_^B^AM-8M-]M-c^_KOM-b^_lOM-b^_M^JOM-b^_M-0OM-b^_KOM-b^_lOM-b^_M^JOM-b^_M-0OM-b^_M-FYM-b^_M-XYM-b^_M-jYM-b^_ZM-b^_M^?M-S[M-b^_M-b^_M-#M-b^_^BM-,M-]M-c^_Copyright
  (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project.

 What is FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE trying to tell me? I've added IPF to my kernel.

 --
 Regards, Charles.
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


security run output

2004-08-14 Thread Chris
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*



First time I've ever seen this:


server.tcslea.org kernel log messages:
 ffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE

(one long line - sorry for the wrapping)

It appears to be CPU related, but in what context? Is it something I need to 
investigate, and if so, how?

Thanks,
Chris
_
Email harvesters eat this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: security run output

2004-08-14 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 07:57:58AM -0500, Chris wrote:
 *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
 
 
 
 First time I've ever seen this:
 
 
 server.tcslea.org kernel log messages:
  ffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE
 
 (one long line - sorry for the wrapping)
 
 It appears to be CPU related, but in what context? Is it something I need to 
 investigate, and if so, how?

No -- that's entirely harmless. If you look at /var/run/dmesg.boot,
you see that it's just part of the normal kernel output during boot.
Specifically it's a list of the capabilities of your CPU.

What's happened is that the message buffer has somehow got truncated
at the beginning, and you're seeing just the end of that particular
line.  For some reason, the daily security script thinks it's
significant kernel output, but it isn't really.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgphM77iTjKFM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re[2]: security run output

2004-08-14 Thread Chris
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*

 ... MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE

No -- that's entirely harmless. If you look at /var/run/dmesg.boot,
you see that it's just part of the normal kernel output during boot.
Specifically it's a list of the capabilities of your CPU.

What's happened is that the message buffer has somehow got truncated
at the beginning, and you're seeing just the end of that particular
line.  For some reason, the daily security script thinks it's
significant kernel output, but it isn't really.


Odd, because I haven't booted in awhile. This just showed up out of the blue this one 
time, and has never shown up before.

Thanks for the info, though.
Chris
_
Email harvesters eat this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


security run output

2004-07-27 Thread Chris
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*




When I get my nightly email from the security run output it normally has about the 
last 20 lines or less from the /var/log/messages. Is there a way to increase that to 
about the last 50 lines?

Thanks,
Chris

_
Email harvesters eat this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: security run output

2004-07-27 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Chris wrote:
When I get my nightly email from the security run output it normally has about the 
last 20 lines or less from the /var/log/messages. Is there a way to increase that to about the 
last 50 lines?
Thanks,
Chris
 

Hmm, I don't think that it's necessarily true that /etc/periodic
is sending you the last 20 or so lines ... it's only sending kernel
notifications, which in the case of most setups of syslog.conf, are
*also* logged to /var/log/messages, hence some confusion here.
So, one good question in return would be, are you sure that
you're not seeing all you want in your periodic output?  You
can take a look at the manpages and source for periodic(8)
and friends to learn a little more...
I'm in no way an expert --- it could be possible that an expert
could modify the periodic.sh script to do what you want; but
in your case, I'd think that you could create a small script to
do what you want and run it nightly from your personal crontab.
Something like what's below.
HTH,
Kevin Kinsey
---
#/bin/sh
# mailmessages.sh --- mail yesterday's /var/log/messages output to root...
yday=`date -v -1d +%b %d`
grep $yday /var/log/messages | mail -s Contents of /var/log/messages 
root 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re[2]: security run output

2004-07-27 Thread Chris
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*

Hmm, I found:

/etc/periodic/security/700.kernelmsg

which seems to be what generates the information I was talking about in the email. So 
I guess you were correct that it's not from /var/log/messages after all.

Having said that, I don't have any idea if there is something in that small script 
that I could change to increase the number of lines it puts into the email. It's a 
bourne shell script, it appears:

if [ -r /etc/defaults/periodic.conf ]
then
. /etc/defaults/periodic.conf
source_periodic_confs
fi

. /etc/periodic/security/security.functions

rc=0

case $daily_status_security_kernelmsg_enable in
[Yy][Ee][Ss])
dmesg 2/dev/null |
check_diff new_only dmesg - ${host} kernel log messages:
rc=$?;;
*)  rc=0;;
esac

exit $rc


And thanks for that script - I'll give it a try.

Chris




___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FW: What is this? (security run output)

2003-08-23 Thread Troy Settle

All, I'm really curious as to what this is, what causes it, and how to
fix it.

Thanks,

--
  Troy Settle
  Pulaski Networks
  http://www.psknet.com
  540.994.4254 ~ 866.477.5638
  Pulaski Chamber 2002 Small Business Of The Year
 

 -Original Message-
 From: Charlie Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 3:01 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: kennedy.psknet.com security run output
 
 
 
 Checking setuid files and devices:
 
 Checking for uids of 0:
 root 0
 toor 0
 
 Checking for passwordless accounts:
 
 kennedy.psknet.com kernel log messages:
  
 M-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-
 ^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^P
 M-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-
 ^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^P
 M-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-
 ^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^P
 M-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-
 ^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^P
 M-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-
 ^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^P
 M-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-
 ^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^P
 M-^PM-^PM-^PM-^PM-^P
 
 kennedy.psknet.com login failures:
 
 kennedy.psknet.com refused connections:
 
 -- End of security output --
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: pooh.ASARian.org security run output (lots of wrong arpmessages)

2003-07-09 Thread John Murphy
Fuzzy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Is there any way to convince the kernel not to log these
incorrect arp messages?

currently we have...
net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_wrong_iface: 1

Is there a different sysctl or variable for rc.conf
to stop it from logging incorrect information?

Indeed there is but only in 5.0 or greater I believe.  It's called:

net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_movements

-- 
HTH
John.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: pooh.ASARian.org security run output (lots of wrong arpmessages)

2003-07-09 Thread Lowell Gilbert
John Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Fuzzy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Is there any way to convince the kernel not to log these
 incorrect arp messages?
 
 currently we have...
 net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_wrong_iface: 1
 
 Is there a different sysctl or variable for rc.conf
 to stop it from logging incorrect information?
 
 Indeed there is but only in 5.0 or greater I believe.  It's called:
 
 net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_movements

Actually, both of those are available in -STABLE.
However, it's usually better to fix the source of the address changes,
if it's under your control.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: daily /security run output via periodic - stopped

2003-07-04 Thread Dave [Hawk-Systems]
we have 4 servers running, each sends daily and security run output email each
day around 3am.  Recently one of them stopped sending these messages.  In
looking at the periodic.conf and associated directories, I don't see any
problems or changes that I am aware of.  There are no enrties in cron for it,
but then again there aren't any entries in the functional servers either.

Is it possible we have disabled something by accident which could stop this one
server from sending these messages?

double checked everything just after sending...

periodic.conf was missing. (doh!)

Dave


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: daily /security run output via periodic - stopped

2003-07-04 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 08:48:24AM -0400, Dave [Hawk-Systems] wrote:
 we have 4 servers running, each sends daily and security run output email each
 day around 3am.  Recently one of them stopped sending these messages.  In
 looking at the periodic.conf and associated directories, I don't see any
 problems or changes that I am aware of.  There are no enrties in cron for it,
 but then again there aren't any entries in the functional servers either.
 
 Is it possible we have disabled something by accident which could stop this one
 server from sending these messages?
 
 double checked everything just after sending...
 
 periodic.conf was missing. (doh!)

... but that's OK, as the periodic system will just run using the
default settings from /etc/defaults/periodic.conf -- note the
instructions in that file: /etc/periodic.conf should contain only
those entries you want to be different to the default values.

As for how the periodic scripts get run each night: they are run as
cron jobs, but out of the system crontab in /etc/crontab.  That's a
slightly different animal which lives in a parallel universe to the
normal per-user crontabs, which are stored in /var/cron/tabs and
generally accessed via crontab(1).

As for the missing mail, did you check the client mailqueue?

# mailq -Ac

or look at the contents of /var/spool/clientmqueue.  If the messages
are held up there, you should investigate what happened to the
sendmail msp queue-runner process which the system will run by default
so long as 'sendmail_enable=YES' or 'sendmail_enable=NO' is in
/etc/rc.conf.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: daily /security run output via periodic - stopped

2003-07-04 Thread Dave [Hawk-Systems]
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 08:48:24AM -0400, Dave [Hawk-Systems] wrote:
 we have 4 servers running, each sends daily and security run output 
email each
 day around 3am.  Recently one of them stopped sending these messages.  In
 looking at the periodic.conf and associated directories, I don't see any
 problems or changes that I am aware of.  There are no enrties in 
cron for it,
 but then again there aren't any entries in the functional servers either.
 
 Is it possible we have disabled something by accident which could 
stop this one
 server from sending these messages?
 
 double checked everything just after sending...
 
 periodic.conf was missing. (doh!)

... but that's OK, as the periodic system will just run using the
default settings from /etc/defaults/periodic.conf -- note the
instructions in that file: /etc/periodic.conf should contain only
those entries you want to be different to the default values.

and the different values were where each of the reports should be emailed to.

As for how the periodic scripts get run each night: they are run as
cron jobs, but out of the system crontab in /etc/crontab.  That's a
slightly different animal which lives in a parallel universe to the
normal per-user crontabs, which are stored in /var/cron/tabs and
generally accessed via crontab(1).

that I didn't know, but do now.  Thanks

As for the missing mail, did you check the client mailqueue?

probably dunped into whatever the default is...  root?

Thanks

Dave

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Security Run Output E-Mails

2003-06-08 Thread Jasvinder S. Bahra
Hey folks,

I'm wondering if you can help me. I have a basic knowledge on UNIX and freebsd, and 
together with the advice of some friends, resources on the internet and an absolutely 
ridiculous amount of toil and sweat, i've managed to put together a somewhat secure 
firewall/gateway machine.

Now, at regular intervals, e-mails are sent to me by the machine...

HOST.DOMAIN.TLD security run output
HOST.DOMAIN.TLD daily run output
HOST.DOMAIN.TLD weekly run output
HOST.DOMAIN.TLD monthly run output

Now, I receive these e-mail regularly at differing times each day (as appropriate). 
For example, the security and the daily ones are sent a couple of minutes after 
03:00am in the morning. The weekly one is sent a couple of minutes after 04:00am. The 
monthly one... 05:00am.

What i want to know is *where* are these script execution times defined? If I want to 
change the monthly run output script to run at 05:30am (for example), where would I go?

Thanks for your time.

Jazz


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sending 'security run output' to another email address

2003-03-08 Thread WillyB
Hi folks..

I've got FreeBSD 4.7 running as my router to the net from local systems.

I am wanting the output from 'security run output' to be sent to my isp email 
address.

The problem is that it's sending the mail to me but bouncing because it's 
sending from FBSD.npgcable.com which fails the dns lookup the isp uses.

I tried masqerading as just npgcable.com and that sorta works.. I now get the 
bounced emails to this address.. I aliased root to admin account and admin 
account to my address here.

Is there a way to tell it to NOT use From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?  To just 
use From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or maybe another way all together to get it to mail me here on my local net 
from the router with out going through the ISP?

I am useing the advice from the handbook 
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail.html
which is only halfway working.

Thanks for any further advice :)

WillyB


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message