in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg thusly...
I apologize for replying so late.
> parv wrote:
> >...only thing that i desire(d) is/was to give / much less than 128MB,
> >but couldn't (during the space slicing).
> >
> >That and to combine /usr2 & /usr3 now. But default
parv wrote:
...only thing that i desire(d) is/was to give / much less than 128MB,
but couldn't (during the space slicing).
That and to combine /usr2 & /usr3 now. But default inode space
allocation of 8%/slice will kill me anyway. I really have to remember
about the newfs options next time.
Do you
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Dino Vliet thusly...
>
> I've installed freebsd 4.9 and am currently busy with installing third
> party apps through the ports collection. What worries me however is
> the size of my /var directory. Take a look at my disk geometry
> (below)
>
> I also had to
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:38:35AM -0800, Dino Vliet wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've installed freebsd 4.9 and am currently busy with
> installing third party apps through the ports
> collection.
> What worries me however is the size of my /var
> directory.
You might consider symlinking /var to /usr/v
Hi there,
I've installed freebsd 4.9 and am currently busy with
installing third party apps through the ports
collection.
What worries me however is the size of my /var
directory.
Take a look at my disk geometry (below)
I also had to get rid of a pkg.db file in the
/var/db/pkg directory because i
Hi there,
I've installed freebsd 4.9 and am currently busy with
installing third party apps through the ports
collection.
What worries me however is the size of my /var
directory.
Take a look at my disk geometry..
I also had to get rid of a pkg.db file in the
/var/db/pkg directory because it took