. Best thing to do when you see pkgdb mentioning
stale dependencies is hit ctrl-c hard, fast and often. Then scroll
up to see what it did wrong and try to figure out how to correct it's
mess.
What is at present the png version installed on your system and could
you show the output of: grep 'DEPORIGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
| Hello,
|
| I will appreciate your advice about how to best handle stale
dependencies. Today I wanted to upgrade phpMyAdmin and I got a number of
questions about stale dependencies. I eventually deleted all of them
On Friday 02 May 2008 07:20:30 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
I will appreciate your advice about how to best handle stale
dependencies. Today I wanted to upgrade phpMyAdmin and I got a number of
questions about stale dependencies. I eventually deleted all of them,
but does this mean I need
Hello,
I will appreciate your advice about how to best handle stale
dependencies. Today I wanted to upgrade phpMyAdmin and I got a number of
questions about stale dependencies. I eventually deleted all of them,
but does this mean I need to upgrade ports which used this dependency
(mailgraph
I've recently had a few problems with KDE 3.5.1, so recently upgraded to 3.5.3
via the ports. I have a port upgrade script which is producing the following
output when executed.
Stale dependency: gconf2-2.14.0_2 -- openldap-client-2.2.30 -- manually run
'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to
On Saturday 24 June 2006 12:27, Robert Davison wrote:
I've recently had a few problems with KDE 3.5.1, so recently upgraded to
3.5.3 via the ports. I have a port upgrade script which is producing the
following output when executed.
Stale dependency: gconf2-2.14.0_2 -- openldap-client-2.2.30
On Jun 24, 2006, at 9:41 AM, Gerard Seibert wrote:
On Saturday 24 June 2006 12:27, Robert Davison wrote:
I've recently had a few problems with KDE 3.5.1, so recently
upgraded to
3.5.3 via the ports. I have a port upgrade script which is
producing the
following output when executed.
Stale
On Saturday 24 June 2006 13:11, vayu wrote:
On Jun 24, 2006, at 9:41 AM, Gerard Seibert wrote:
//snip//
I've had the hardest time understanding what pkgdb asks. This is the
only article I've found which makes some sense to me:
) or for
all upcoming selections for all stale dependencies?
Thanks,
Duane Whitty
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 11:42 -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
Andrew writes:
I've run pkgdb -F as portupgrade suggests, deleting stale
dependencies, but they seem to keep reappearing.
I'm not an expert on pkgdb, but I'm pretty sure that's the way
it works.
You need
-1.10_2
I don't even know what half of them do. I've deleted all the stale
dependencies because freshports.org says the only run-time dependency is
java/jdk14 (jdk15 on my machine). Is this right?
Ashley
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
mozilla-1.7.12_5,2
tiff-3.8.0
bitstream-vera-1.10_2
Nope.
I don't even know what half of them do. I've deleted all the stale
dependencies because freshports.org says the only run-time
dependency is
java/jdk14 (jdk15 on my machine). Is this right?
According to make, yes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Friday 10 February 2006 20:35, Andrew wrote:
think I've got it now. I believe I was correct in thinking
that portupgrade usually takes care of dependencies; the portion that I
was missing was that pkgdb catches what discrepancies do appear between
what is installed and what is required.
Hello,
I am trying to use a combination of portaudit and portupgrade to
automatically maintain installed packages on my system, but portupgrade
often hangs on stale dependencies. I've run pkgdb -F as portupgrade
suggests, deleting stale dependencies, but they seem to keep
reappearing. I guess I'm
Andrew writes:
I've run pkgdb -F as portupgrade suggests, deleting stale
dependencies, but they seem to keep reappearing.
I'm not an expert on pkgdb, but I'm pretty sure that's the way
it works.
You need to fix, not delete, the stale dependencies. This may
take some effort
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 11:42 -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
Andrew writes:
I've run pkgdb -F as portupgrade suggests, deleting stale
dependencies, but they seem to keep reappearing.
I'm not an expert on pkgdb, but I'm pretty sure that's the way
it works.
You need to fix
On Friday 10 February 2006 12:41, Andrew wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 11:42 -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
Andrew writes:
I've run pkgdb -F as portupgrade suggests, deleting stale
dependencies, but they seem to keep reappearing.
I'm not an expert on pkgdb, but I'm pretty sure that's
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 11:42 -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
Andrew writes:
I've run pkgdb -F as portupgrade suggests, deleting stale
dependencies, but they seem to keep reappearing.
I'm not an expert on pkgdb, but I'm pretty sure that's the way
it works.
You need to fix
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 15:11 -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
Andrew writes:
I guess what is unclear to me is how I go about fixing the stale
dependencies. I was under the impression that portupgrade would
take care of the dependencies for a particular port, and the
stale dependency
--- Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 11:42 -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
Andrew writes:
I've run pkgdb -F as portupgrade suggests, deleting stale
dependencies, but they seem to keep reappearing.
I'm not an expert on pkgdb, but I'm pretty sure that's
Sunday 20 November 2005 03:18 skrev RW:
On Saturday 19 November 2005 10:37, Philip Lykke Carlsen wrote:
.. does anyone know why the problem of stale dependencies in the package
system occurs?.. it's just.. the system won't let you install any given
port/package without having met all
.. does anyone know why the problem of stale dependencies in the package system
occurs?.. it's just.. the system won't let you install any given port/package
without having met all the dependencies.. just how does it _forget_ that it
just installed some package
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:37:45AM +0100, Philip Lykke Carlsen wrote:
.. does anyone know why the problem of stale dependencies in the package
system occurs?.. it's just.. the system won't let you install any given
port/package without having met all the dependencies.. just how does
On Saturday 19 November 2005 10:37, Philip Lykke Carlsen wrote:
.. does anyone know why the problem of stale dependencies in the package
system occurs?.. it's just.. the system won't let you install any given
port/package without having met all the dependencies..
That's not entirely true
On Saturday 19 November 2005 10:37, Philip Lykke Carlsen wrote:
.. does anyone know why the problem of stale dependencies in the package
system occurs?.. it's just.. the system won't let you install any given
port/package without having met all the dependencies.. just how does it
_forget_
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, Andrew P.
On 10/29/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
this from happening again? What can/can't I safely include in cron to
automate database and index maintenance?
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
this from happening again? What can/can't I safely include in
On 10/30/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
this
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
this from happening again? What can/can't I safely include in cron to
automate database and index maintenance?
cvsup or portsnap, then portsdb -uUF. Work under
any
On Oct 28, 2005, at 7:31 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
cd /usr/ports/www/apache20 make deinstall make clean make
reinstall
See what happens.
Talk about strange:
# cd /usr/ports/www/apache20/
# make deinstall
=== Deinstalling for www/apache20
=== apache not installed, skipping
# make -V
I ended up deinstalling that apache installation (which I was not keen
on doing), and installing the apache20 port (which was the same
version (2.0.55) as the apache2 port ?), and, thankfully, it's
working fine. I'm also now able to run both 'pkgdb -F'and 'portsdb
-Uu' without ANY errors (except
/usr/ports won't fix his problems, they reside in /var/db/pkg.
I may be a bit biased but I reaaly think John D. should try running
portmanager -u (ports/sysutils/portmanager). Stale dependencies is a non
issue for portmanager.
-Mike
___
freebsd
On Friday, October 28, 2005 3:25:14 AM, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade stale dependencies
Wrote these words of wisdom:
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John
On 10/28/05, Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I feel that portmanager does a much better job of updating
without the problems that seem to crop up so often using portupgrade.
I've always been scared off by the comparatively
young age of portmanager. Besides, portupgrade
doing this on
a headless server that isn't going to serve X.
HTH
Replacing /usr/ports won't fix his problems, they reside in /var/db/pkg.
I may be a bit biased but I reaaly think John D. should try running
portmanager -u (ports/sysutils/portmanager). Stale dependencies is a non
issue
doing this on
a headless server that isn't going to serve X.
HTH
Replacing /usr/ports won't fix his problems, they reside in /var/db/pkg.
I may be a bit biased but I reaaly think John D. should try running
portmanager -u (ports/sysutils/portmanager). Stale dependencies is a non
/usr/ports won't fix his problems, they reside in /var/db/pkg.
I may be a bit biased but I reaaly think John D. should try running
portmanager -u (ports/sysutils/portmanager). Stale dependencies is a non
issue for portmanager.
-Mike
Biased indeed. ;) I tried it, and it did work for some ports
. should try running
portmanager -u (ports/sysutils/portmanager). Stale dependencies is a non
issue for portmanager.
-Mike
Biased indeed. ;) I tried it, and it did work for some ports, but not
all. Here's the report output of a second run-through:
status report finished
status report finished
==
==
percentDone-=0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 /
TOTAL_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 ) )
upgrade 0.3.0_0 info: ignoring apache-2.0.48, reason: failed during
(2) make
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: portupgrade stale dependencies
Date: Friday 28 October 2005 15:02
From: Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 28 October 2005 13:29, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL
On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
status report finished
==
==
percentDone-=0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 /
TOTAL_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 ) )
upgrade 0.3.0_0 info: ignoring apache-2.0.48,
On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
status report finished
==
==
percentDone-=0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 /
On Friday 28 October 2005 19:51, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
status report finished
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
status report finished
==
==
percentDone-=0 = 100
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...snip...
After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the ultimate
problem was actually a dependency of the package to apache1.3. After I
ran 'pkgdb -F' and
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the ultimate
problem was actually a dependency of the package to
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the
ultimate
reaaly think John D. should try running
portmanager -u (ports/sysutils/portmanager). Stale dependencies is a non
issue for portmanager.
-Mike
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
.'
'pkgdb -O' returned an invalid option error, and 'pkgdb -o aalib-1.4.r5_1'
returned 'graphics/aalib'. I then ran 'pkgdb -F' to try and fix this (and
many, many other) stale dependencies, but the error I got when trying to
run
portupgrade afterward simply changed the stale dependency
-1.4.r5_1'
returned 'graphics/aalib'. I then ran 'pkgdb -F' to try and fix this (and
many, many other) stale dependencies, but the error I got when trying to run
portupgrade afterward simply changed the stale dependency error to '
aalib-1.4.r5_1 -- XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6'.
How does one
On Saturday, October 15, 2005 9:21:00 PM, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade stale dependencies
Wrote these words of wisdom:
On 10/16/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use portupgrade to update my installed ports. I ran into
trouble with dependencies
:
'Stale dependency: aalib-1.4.r5_1 -- imake-4.3.0_1 -- manually run 'pkgdb
-F' to fix, or specify -O to force.'
'pkgdb -O' returned an invalid option error, and 'pkgdb -o aalib-1.4.r5_1'
returned 'graphics/aalib'. I then ran 'pkgdb -F' to try and fix this (and
many, many other) stale dependencies
' to try and fix this (and
many, many other) stale dependencies, but the error I got when trying to run
portupgrade afterward simply changed the stale dependency error to '
aalib-1.4.r5_1 -- XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6'.
How does one get around these dependency errors without destroying a system
Mark Withers wrote:
Hello everyone!
I've been using FBSD for a few years now, but am not
sure as to what a 'stale dependency' is...
I am receiving an error message with ymessenger pkg
that it has stale dependencies and to use 'pkgdb -F'
to fix or -O to force.
I'm a bit inexperienced when it comes
Hello everyone!
I've been using FBSD for a few years now, but am not
sure as to what a 'stale dependency' is...
I am receiving an error message with ymessenger pkg
that it has stale dependencies and to use 'pkgdb -F'
to fix or -O to force.
I'm a bit inexperienced when it comes to repairing
On Saturday 21 August 2004 2:22 am, Mark Withers wrote:
Hello everyone!
I've been using FBSD for a few years now, but am not
sure as to what a 'stale dependency' is...
I am receiving an error message with ymessenger pkg
that it has stale dependencies and to use 'pkgdb -F'
to fix or -O
Hello,
I've run into problems (most often with p5-* ports) with stale
dependencies. I don't know how to solve them other than deleting
them, which I know is the wrong way to do it.
Currently, I have 2 things I'm not sure how to handle:
% sudo pkgdb -F
--- Checking the package registry
Paul D. Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
I've run into problems (most often with p5-* ports) with stale
dependencies. I don't know how to solve them other than deleting
them, which I know is the wrong way to do it.
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/11/29/Big_Scary_Daemons.html
Michael's article's been
mentioned
are installed except dockbook-xsl-1.62.3. In addition, the sgmlformat
port is not installed either.
I always understood that stale dependencies indicated that a change was
necessary. In this
situation, the 6 dependencies in question, including the port itself,
weren't even registered
I think if it were me, I would check to see if the docbook-310 port
were still
installed correctly, and if not, install it and then try pkgdb -F again.
Not sure I understanad the need to examine docbook-310. When I run
pkg_info -ro sgmlformat-1.7_2, I get the following:
Information for
a
second time that things became clearer. You wrote:
The dependency is recorded as docbook-3.1_2 and it does not
see that package, so it is suggesting the package it believes is
the closest
match. (dockbook-xsl-1.62.3)
I always understood that stale dependencies
are installed except dockbook-xsl-1.62.3. In addition, the sgmlformat
port is not installed either.
I always understood that stale dependencies indicated that a change was
necessary. In this
situation, the 6 dependencies in question, including the port itself,
weren't even registered or installed
yet. I
Hi,
Just ran my weekly cvsup program followed by portsbd -Uu. Tried running
portsversion -l and received a message indicating that I should run
pkgdb -F to deal with a stale dependency. Note following:
Stale dependency: sgmlformat-1.7_2 - docbook-3.1_2 (textproc/docbook-310):
Just ran my weekly cvsup program followed by portsbd -Uu. Tried running
portsversion -l and received a message indicating that I should run
pkgdb -F to deal with a stale dependency. Note following:
Stale dependency: sgmlformat-1.7_2 - docbook-3.1_2 (textproc/docbook-310):
docbook-xsl-1.62.3
Lee Harr wrote:
Just ran my weekly cvsup program followed by portsbd -Uu. Tried running
portsversion -l and received a message indicating that I should run
pkgdb -F to deal with a stale dependency. Note following:
Stale dependency: sgmlformat-1.7_2 - docbook-3.1_2
(textproc/docbook-310):
67 matches
Mail list logo
