Upgrade from 5.2.1-RELEASE to 5.3-STABLE

Hi, I`ve cvsuped 5.3 sources, done make buildworld and make buildkernel with no problems. But, on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/migration-guide.html i`ve read: Due to the upgraded GCC compiler, C++ programs generally need to be recompiled and reinstalled. This requirement comes from changes

Re: Upgrade from 5.2.1-RELEASE to 5.3-STABLE

On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 20:20:20 +0100, Piotr Gnyp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Due to the upgraded GCC compiler, C++ programs generally need to be recompiled and reinstalled. This requirement comes from changes in the C++ ABI. My gcc version: Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386

Re: Upgrade from 5.2.1-RELEASE to 5.3-STABLE

Piotr Gnyp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I`ve cvsuped 5.3 sources, done make buildworld and make buildkernel with no problems. But, on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/migration-guide.html i`ve read: Due to the upgraded GCC compiler, C++ programs generally need to be recompiled and

Re: Upgrade from 5.2.1-RELEASE to 5.3-STABLE

On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 05:02:01PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Only the ones that are written in C++. But it's probably easier to rebuild everything than to figure out which ones include some C++ sources. Hmm the page mentions it when upgradimg from 4.x: 3 New Features: [...] GCC: The

Re: Upgrade from 5.2.1-RELEASE to 5.3-STABLE

Piotr Gnyp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 05:02:01PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Only the ones that are written in C++. But it's probably easier to rebuild everything than to figure out which ones include some C++ sources. Hmm the page mentions it when upgradimg from

5.3-RC2 Release delays 5.3-RELEASE?

Does anyone know if the latest decision to create a 5.3-RC2 will delay the scheduled 11/5/04 release of 5.3-RELEASE? And for how long if so? Thanks for any info. Mike ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: The release of 5.3

On Sunday 17 October 2004 15:04, Christian Laursen wrote: $ dmesg | grep em0 Same here, but in 1000-base-T: $ uname -a FreeBSD web2.daycos.com 5.3-BETA7 FreeBSD 5.3-BETA7 #1: Sat Oct 2 17:03:07 CDT 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WEB2 i386 $ dmesg | grep em0 em0: Intel(R)

Re: The release of 5.3

I don't see how they can possible consider the Release of an O/S version when perhaps the most widely-available NIC (em) doesn't work. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send

RE: The release of 5.3

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 8:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The release of 5.3 I don't see how they can possible consider the Release of an O/S version when perhaps

RE: The release of 5.3

Saw the mention of em nics and wanted to double check for my own piece of mind... I have a Supermicro SuperServer 5013G-I P4 3.06GHz 1U with Dual Intel 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet that I'm waiting to put 5.3 Release on. http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.2R/hardware-i386.html#ETHERNET shows

Re: The release of 5.3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't see how they can possible consider the Release of an O/S version when perhaps the most widely-available NIC (em) doesn't work. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a [22:03] FreeBSD borg.borderworlds.dk 5.3-RC1

Re: The release of 5.3

On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 03:54:04PM -0400, NetAdmin wrote: Saw the mention of em nics and wanted to double check for my own piece of mind... I have a Supermicro SuperServer 5013G-I P4 3.06GHz 1U with Dual Intel 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet that I'm waiting to put 5.3 Release on. http

The release of 5.3

How far off is it now? Seems RC1 was missed, and according to the site (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/schedule.html) it should be out in 2 days. -- Best regards, Chris A fool and your money are soon partners. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing