Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Dave McCammon
--- Norm Vilmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave McCammon wrote: > > > --- Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Norm Vilmer wrote: > >>> > Here are the rules that I have that keep-state > >> > >>on the outside interface: > >> > >>

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Norm Vilmer
Micheal Patterson wrote: - Original Message - From: "Norm Vilmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Micheal Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 11:47 AM Subject: Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry Micheal P

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Micheal Patterson
- Original Message - From: "Norm Vilmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Micheal Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 11:47 AM Subject: Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry > Micheal Patter

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Norm Vilmer
Dave McCammon wrote: --- Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Norm Vilmer wrote: Here are the rules that I have that keep-state on the outside interface: #For DNS add 01300 pass udp from ${oip} to any 53 keep-state # For NTP add 01400 pass udp from ${oip} to any 12

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Norm Vilmer
Bill Moran wrote: Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Norm Vilmer wrote: Here are the rules that I have that keep-state on the outside interface: #For DNS add 01300 pass udp from ${oip} to any 53 keep-state # For NTP add 01400 pass udp from ${oip} to any 123 keep-state # For VPN add 01500 pass gre from

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Norm Vilmer
Micheal Patterson wrote: - Original Message - From: "Norm Vilmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Micheal Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:30 AM Subject: Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry I do h

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Dave McCammon
--- Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Norm Vilmer wrote: > > > Here are the rules that I have that keep-state > on the outside interface: > > > > > > #For DNS > > > add 01300 pass udp from ${oip} to any 53 > keep-state > > > # For NTP > > > add 01400 p

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Dave McCammon
--- Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Norm Vilmer wrote: > > > Here are the rules that I have that keep-state > on the outside interface: > > > > > > #For DNS > > > add 01300 pass udp from ${oip} to any 53 > keep-state > > > # For NTP > > > add 01400 p

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Dave McCammon
> You'll generally need to keep state on UDP when you > play online games. > > If you're smart, you don't allow arbitrary UDP > packets from the outside > world into your network, but if you're playing > Unreal or something, then > all communication is via UDP, and you won't be able > to play. >

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Micheal Patterson
- Original Message - From: "Norm Vilmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Micheal Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:30 AM Subject: Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry > > I do have a check-s

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Bill Moran
Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Norm Vilmer wrote: > > Here are the rules that I have that keep-state on the outside interface: > > > > #For DNS > > add 01300 pass udp from ${oip} to any 53 keep-state > > # For NTP > > add 01400 pass udp from ${oip} to any 123 keep-state > > # For VPN > > add 01

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Norm Vilmer
Micheal Patterson wrote: . - Original Message - From: "Norm Vilmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Micheal Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 9:41 AM Subject: Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry Mic

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Rob
Norm Vilmer wrote: Here are the rules that I have that keep-state on the outside interface: #For DNS add 01300 pass udp from ${oip} to any 53 keep-state # For NTP add 01400 pass udp from ${oip} to any 123 keep-state # For VPN add 01500 pass gre from any to any keep-state # For ICMP add 01600 pass i

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Micheal Patterson
. - Original Message - From: "Norm Vilmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Micheal Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 9:41 AM Subject: Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry > Micheal Patterson wrote:

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-17 Thread Norm Vilmer
Micheal Patterson wrote: . - Original Message - From: "Norm Vilmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 11:57 PM Subject: Too many dynamic rules, sorry If I repeatedly nmap my FreeBSD 4.10 machine configured with ipfirew

Re: Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-16 Thread Micheal Patterson
. - Original Message - From: "Norm Vilmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 11:57 PM Subject: Too many dynamic rules, sorry If I repeatedly nmap my FreeBSD 4.10 machine configured with ipfirewall, I get the message &

Too many dynamic rules, sorry

2004-09-16 Thread Norm Vilmer
If I repeatedly nmap my FreeBSD 4.10 machine configured with ipfirewall, I get the message "Too many dynamic rules, sorry". Doing a sysctl -a |grep ip.fw I can see the the net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_count has reached the max value of 8192 that I set. The net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_ack_lifetime is set