Re: Two xorg-server packages?

2008-06-14 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 04:57:49PM -0500, Zane C.B. wrote:
> 
> I would just compile x11-server/xorg-server and once it is done do a
> pkg_delete on xorg-server-snap. Then install
> xorg-server/xorg-server. What it is complaining about is
> x11-servers/xorg-server-snap being marked as to be ignored, which it
> should be now as it is a out of date snap shot of xorg-server from
> some time back.

Should that be "x11-servers/xorg-server", instead of
"xorg-server/xorg-server"?

. . . or are you referring to something else?

-- 
Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ]
McCloctnick the Lucid: "The first rule of magic is simple. Don't waste
your time waving your hands and hopping when a rock or a club will do."


pgpE7m4GjDckE.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Two xorg-server packages?

2008-06-14 Thread Zane C.B.
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:06:47 -0600
Chad Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I seem to have two xorg-server packages on a FreeBSD system of
> mine, and I'm not sure why.  With one of them, there's no problem:
> 
>   xorg-server-1.4_10,1=  up-to-date with port 
> 
> One of them won't upgrade:
> 
>   xorg-server-1.2.99.903_1,1  <  needs updating (port has
> 1.2.99.903_2,1) 
> 
>   ** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-servers/xorg-server-snap:
>   is outdated
>   ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
>   - x11-servers/xorg-server-snap (marked as IGNORE)
> 
> . . . and portaudit says it's vulnerable:
> 
>   Affected package: xorg-server-1.2.99.903_1,1
>   Type of problem: xorg -- multiple vulnerabilities.
>   Reference:
>   
> <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/fe2b6597-c9a4-11dc-8da8-0008a18a9961.html>
> 
> Why do I have this xorg-server-1.2.99.903_1,1 package?  It appears
> to be nothing but an older version.  Should I remove it, or figure
> out how to upgrade it?  Is it actually just an older version of the
> same package, or is it a different/separate package entirely?
> 
> Any help figuring this out would be appreciated.

I would just compile x11-server/xorg-server and once it is done do a
pkg_delete on xorg-server-snap. Then install
xorg-server/xorg-server. What it is complaining about is
x11-servers/xorg-server-snap being marked as to be ignored, which it
should be now as it is a out of date snap shot of xorg-server from
some time back.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Two xorg-server packages?

2008-06-14 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 09:53:06AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> When did you lastly update your ports tree using any of the different
> methods available?

I run `portsnap fetch update` (among other things) almost daily, and did
so yesterday a couple of times in the course of trying to figure out
what's going on with that particular Xorg package before sending a
message to the list about it.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ]
Bjarne Stroustrup: "An ugly operation should have an ugly syntactic
form."


pgp5eYKEEMlFT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Two xorg-server packages?

2008-06-13 Thread Odhiambo Washington
When did you lastly update your ports tree using any of the different
methods available?



On 6/14/08, Chad Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I seem to have two xorg-server packages on a FreeBSD system of mine, and
> I'm not sure why.  With one of them, there's no problem:
>
>   xorg-server-1.4_10,1=  up-to-date with port
>
> One of them won't upgrade:
>
>   xorg-server-1.2.99.903_1,1  <  needs updating (port has 1.2.99.903_2,1)
>
>   ** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-servers/xorg-server-snap:
>   is outdated
>   ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
>   - x11-servers/xorg-server-snap (marked as IGNORE)
>
> . . . and portaudit says it's vulnerable:
>
>   Affected package: xorg-server-1.2.99.903_1,1
>   Type of problem: xorg -- multiple vulnerabilities.
>   Reference:
>
> <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/fe2b6597-c9a4-11dc-8da8-0008a18a9961.html>
>
> Why do I have this xorg-server-1.2.99.903_1,1 package?  It appears to be
> nothing but an older version.  Should I remove it, or figure out how to
> upgrade it?  Is it actually just an older version of the same package, or
> is it a different/separate package entirely?
>
> Any help figuring this out would be appreciated.
>
> --
> Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ]
> print substr("Just another Perl hacker", 0, -2);
>

-- 
Sent from Google Mail for mobile | mobile.google.com

Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

"Oh My God! They killed init! You Bastards!"
--from a /. post
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Two xorg-server packages?

2008-06-13 Thread Chad Perrin
I seem to have two xorg-server packages on a FreeBSD system of mine, and
I'm not sure why.  With one of them, there's no problem:

  xorg-server-1.4_10,1=  up-to-date with port 

One of them won't upgrade:

  xorg-server-1.2.99.903_1,1  <  needs updating (port has 1.2.99.903_2,1) 

  ** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-servers/xorg-server-snap:
  is outdated
  ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
  - x11-servers/xorg-server-snap (marked as IGNORE)

. . . and portaudit says it's vulnerable:

  Affected package: xorg-server-1.2.99.903_1,1
  Type of problem: xorg -- multiple vulnerabilities.
  Reference:
  
<http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/fe2b6597-c9a4-11dc-8da8-0008a18a9961.html>

Why do I have this xorg-server-1.2.99.903_1,1 package?  It appears to be
nothing but an older version.  Should I remove it, or figure out how to
upgrade it?  Is it actually just an older version of the same package, or
is it a different/separate package entirely?

Any help figuring this out would be appreciated.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ]
print substr("Just another Perl hacker", 0, -2);


pgphyfjeXYdyX.pgp
Description: PGP signature