It could be done. At the present time ZFS is not really suitable on
systems without a lot of memory (I'd recommend at least 1GB). It is
also very hard to tune it to perform well on i386 because of VM and
address space issues. It might be possible to address these over
time.
1GB for disk and
On 24/06/07, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It could be done. At the present time ZFS is not really suitable on
systems without a lot of memory (I'd recommend at least 1GB). It is
also very hard to tune it to perform well on i386 because of VM and
address space issues. It might
On 6/15/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 03:25:12PM -0400, Jim Capozzoli wrote:
On 6/15/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:51:31PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote:
Hi all
Anyone known what's the futur of ufs2 ? Is there any
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 21:49 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
UFS and future derivatives are here to stay.
Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using ZFS
for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a
if ZFS will really be so nice i will be making
Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 21:49 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
UFS and future derivatives are here to stay.
Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using ZFS
for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a
if ZFS will really
Hi all
Anyone known what's the futur of ufs2 ? Is there any plan to make a ufs3
for very large FS ( 2TB) . Or the plan is to use classic ufs for / /usr and
lets
use ZFS for /home
Regards.
--
Albert SHIH
Observatoire de Paris Meudon
SIO batiment 15
Heure local/Local time:
Ven 15 jui 2007
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:51:31PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote:
Hi all
Anyone known what's the futur of ufs2 ? Is there any plan to make a ufs3
for very large FS ( 2TB) . Or the plan is to use classic ufs for / /usr
and lets
use ZFS for /home
ZFS will remain an optional alternative
On 6/15/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:51:31PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote:
Hi all
Anyone known what's the futur of ufs2 ? Is there any plan to make a ufs3
for very large FS ( 2TB) . Or the plan is to use classic ufs for / /usr
and lets
use ZFS for
UFS and future derivatives are here to stay.
Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using ZFS
for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a
if ZFS will really be so nice i will be making small (50MB) partition for
/boot files, ZFS on rest.
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
UFS and future derivatives are here to stay.
Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using
ZFS for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a
if ZFS will really be so nice i will be making small (50MB)
partition
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
UFS and future derivatives are here to stay.
if ZFS will really be so nice i will be making small (50MB)
partition for /boot files, ZFS on rest.
http://blogs.sun.com/ontherecord/entry/now_available_three_new_solaris
I know it is a sun site. Don't
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 03:25:12PM -0400, Jim Capozzoli wrote:
On 6/15/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:51:31PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote:
Hi all
Anyone known what's the futur of ufs2 ? Is there any plan to make a ufs3
for very large FS ( 2TB) . Or the
12 matches
Mail list logo
