On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:24:50 -0600
Brett Glass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a server which I am considering upgrading from 4.11 to 6.2.
>Besides the operating system disk (which contains all of the
>expected partitions such as /, /usr, /var, and /tmp), There's a
>large data disk on the sy
On Mar 23, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 11:36:21AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Brett Glass wrote:
I have a server which I am considering upgrading from 4.11 to
6.2. Besides
the operating system disk (which contains all of the expec
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 11:36:21AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Brett Glass wrote:
>
> >I have a server which I am considering upgrading from 4.11 to 6.2. Besides
> >the operating system disk (which contains all of the expected partitions
> >such as /, /usr, /var, and /
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Brett Glass wrote:
I have a server which I am considering upgrading from 4.11 to 6.2. Besides the
operating system disk (which contains all of the expected partitions such as /,
/usr, /var, and /tmp), There's a large data disk on the system containing
useful data that I'd
I have a server which I am considering upgrading from 4.11 to 6.2.
Besides the operating system disk (which contains all of the
expected partitions such as /, /usr, /var, and /tmp), There's a
large data disk on the system containing useful data that I'd like
to put back online as soon as the up
