RE: Viability of 5.X line for production use

2004-01-06 Thread fbsd_user
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 11:18 AM To: John Fox Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Viability of 5.X line for production use On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:43:26AM -0800, John Fox wrote: > He

Re: Viability of 5.X line for production use

2004-01-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:43:26AM -0800, John Fox wrote: > Hello, > > We're planning some new mail servers, and until now I've been assuming > that they would run under FreeBSD 4.X. But it occurred to me this > morning that the 4.X line is going to go away relatively soon, and that > perhaps I'

Re: Viability of 5.X line for production use

2004-01-05 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jan 05), John Fox said: > We're planning some new mail servers, and until now I've been > assuming that they would run under FreeBSD 4.X. But it occurred to > me this morning that the 4.X line is going to go away relatively > soon, and that perhaps I'd be better off going with

Viability of 5.X line for production use

2004-01-05 Thread John Fox
Hello, We're planning some new mail servers, and until now I've been assuming that they would run under FreeBSD 4.X. But it occurred to me this morning that the 4.X line is going to go away relatively soon, and that perhaps I'd be better off going with 5.X for these new boxen, as it would probab