Warnings after overclock

2008-03-18 Thread Ghirai
Hello list,

I just overclocked my CPU a bit for the sake of it,
from 2.3GHz to ~2.8GHz.

Everything is nice and stable, but after reboot i get this message:

calcru: runtime went backwards from 19330 usec to 16092 usec for pid 597 
(hald-runner)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 244138 usec to 203252 usec for pid 597 
(hald-runner)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 1345442 usec to 1122955 usec for pid 596 
(hald)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 10959 usec to 9124 usec for pid 596 (hald)
...

I suspect it's got something to do with kern.timecounter.hardware;
atm. it seems to be ACPI-fast; do i need to change it to TSC?

Thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Ghirai.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Warnings after overclock

2008-03-18 Thread Kris Kennaway

Ghirai wrote:

Hello list,

I just overclocked my CPU a bit for the sake of it,
from 2.3GHz to ~2.8GHz.

Everything is nice and stable, but after reboot i get this message:

calcru: runtime went backwards from 19330 usec to 16092 usec for pid 597 
(hald-runner)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 244138 usec to 203252 usec for pid 597 
(hald-runner)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 1345442 usec to 1122955 usec for pid 596 
(hald)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 10959 usec to 9124 usec for pid 596 (hald)
...


...so you mean everything is nice and stable except your system no 
longer has stable timecounting.



I suspect it's got something to do with kern.timecounter.hardware;
atm. it seems to be ACPI-fast; do i need to change it to TSC?


I suspect your overclocked CPU.

Kris

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Warnings after overclock

2008-03-18 Thread David Kelly


On Mar 18, 2008, at 3:32 PM, Ghirai wrote:


Hello list,

I just overclocked my CPU a bit for the sake of it,
from 2.3GHz to ~2.8GHz.


You know that you should create a new message and address it to the  
list rather than edit a reply to another thread the way you sent the  
above?


No matter how hard you edit the following headers (In-Reply-To: and  
References:) remained in your message hidden from casual view. For  
those who read this list in collapsed threaded view would never have  
seen your message under bsdlabel, now no boot unless they were  
reading that thread.


Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:32:03 +0200
From: Ghirai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]