As you with good memories know, I lost 3000 pictures of my first sons
first year this month. I did have a RAID-5 system with fresh disks,
however, shit happens and I have a feeling that this could have been
avoided if I read my log files better.
As has been mentioned, if you have critical
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Joachim Dagerot wrote:
As you with good memories know, I lost 3000 pictures of my first sons
first year this month. I did have a RAID-5 system with fresh disks,
however, shit happens and I have a feeling that this could have been
avoided if I read my log files better.
I'm
Joachim Dagerot wrote:
[ ... ]
I realise you are right. The thing is that this is a home system and I
have (had!) around 230 GB of data that was non-replicable. I am not
aware of a deasent backup system that can handle that amount of data.
There are three main alternatives:
1) hard drives -- get
As you with good memories know, I lost 3000 pictures of my first sons
first year this month. I did have a RAID-5 system with fresh disks,
however, shit happens and I have a feeling that this could have been
avoided if I read my log files better.
So basically,
a) I get a mail each time my a
On 12/27/2003 at 7:40 PM Joachim Dagerot wrote:
|As you with good memories know, I lost 3000 pictures of my first sons
|first year this month. I did have a RAID-5 system with fresh disks,
|however, shit happens and I have a feeling that this could have been
|avoided if I read my log files better.
Joachim Dagerot wrote:
As you with good memories know, I lost 3000 pictures of my first sons
first year this month. I did have a RAID-5 system with fresh disks,
however, shit happens and I have a feeling that this could have been
avoided if I read my log files better.
I'm sorry that you lost data.
