Re: Why FreeBSD procfs is so different from the Linux one?

2007-10-17 Thread James
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 15:29 -0500, Josh Paetzel wrote: > Jonathan Chen wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 02:24:49AM -0700, Yuri wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > When I look at /proc/PID/ in FreeBSD I see the files: > > > cmdline ctl dbregs etype filefpregs map mem note > > >

Re: Why FreeBSD procfs is so different from the Linux one?

2007-10-17 Thread Josh Paetzel
Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 02:24:49AM -0700, Yuri wrote: > > Hi, > > > > When I look at /proc/PID/ in FreeBSD I see the files: > > cmdline ctl dbregs etype filefpregs map mem note > > notepg > > regsrlimit status > > and in Linux: > > cmdline cpu

Re: Why FreeBSD procfs is so different from the Linux one?

2007-10-17 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 02:24:49AM -0700, Yuri wrote: > Hi, > > When I look at /proc/PID/ in FreeBSD I see the files: > cmdline ctl dbregs etype filefpregs map mem note > notepg > regsrlimit status > and in Linux: > cmdline cpu cwd environ exe fd maps mem moun

Why FreeBSD procfs is so different from the Linux one?

2007-10-17 Thread Yuri
Hi, When I look at /proc/PID/ in FreeBSD I see the files: cmdline ctl dbregs etype filefpregs map mem notenotepg regsrlimit status and in Linux: cmdline cpu cwd environ exe fd maps mem mounts root stat statm status Why there's such a difference in procfs