Sean Ellis wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 06:04:09PM -0800, Sean Ellis wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:31:38PM -0800, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
>
>> OK, hang on. Here it is in an older handbook I have. Appearing as:
>> "19.4.15.5. Can I use one machine as a master to upgrade lots of machines
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 06:04:09PM -0800, Sean Ellis wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:31:38PM -0800, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> OK, hang on. Here it is in an older handbook I have. Appearing as:
> "19.4.15.5. Can I use one machine as a master to upgrade lots of machines
> (NFS)?", a question at t
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:31:38PM -0800, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> Rowdy told a big fish story including the following on 12/23/2003 1:31 PM:
> >
> >My attempts to compile a (5.1-RELEASE) kernel on a very old PC take
> >around 5 hours (of compile time), while a much faster machine sits by
> >idle.
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 21:31, Rowdy wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> My attempts to compile a (5.1-RELEASE) kernel on a very old PC take
> around 5 hours (of compile time), while a much faster machine sits by
> idle. It would be great to be able to compile the kernel on the faster
> machine and transf
Rowdy told a big fish story including the following on 12/23/2003 1:31 PM:
Greetings,
My attempts to compile a (5.1-RELEASE) kernel on a very old PC take
around 5 hours (of compile time), while a much faster machine sits by
idle. It would be great to be able to compile the kernel on the
faste
Greetings,
My attempts to compile a (5.1-RELEASE) kernel on a very old PC take
around 5 hours (of compile time), while a much faster machine sits by
idle. It would be great to be able to compile the kernel on the faster
machine and transfer it to the older machine.
Would I be correct in think