Matthew Seaman said:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:40:48PM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
>
>> Is it save to install WinXP after FreeBSD? My IBM recovery cd goofed
>> up my WinXP and I'd like to reinstall XP only and keep my existing
>> FreeBSD slices intact. Same goes for the MBR, of course.
>>
>> And y
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:01:09PM -0400, Jud wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:53:54 +0200, Alex de Kruijff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:15:05PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> [snip]
> >>Hmmm... It's a long time since I had any dealings with a Microsoft OS,
> >>but
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:53:54 +0200, Alex de Kruijff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:15:05PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
[snip]
Hmmm... It's a long time since I had any dealings with a Microsoft OS,
but I seem to remember that they always preferred to go in the first
partiti
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:15:05PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:40:48PM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
>
> > Is it save to install WinXP after FreeBSD? My IBM recovery cd goofed
> > up my WinXP and I'd like to reinstall XP only and keep my existing
> > FreeBSD slices intact
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:40:48PM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
> Is it save to install WinXP after FreeBSD? My IBM recovery cd goofed
> up my WinXP and I'd like to reinstall XP only and keep my existing
> FreeBSD slices intact. Same goes for the MBR, of course.
>
> And yes, I will back up my data i
Hi
Is it save to install WinXP after FreeBSD? My IBM recovery cd goofed
up my WinXP and I'd like to reinstall XP only and keep my existing
FreeBSD slices intact. Same goes for the MBR, of course.
And yes, I will back up my data in any case, but I'd still hate it if
I had to set up my whole system
