On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others
as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG
invokes installation of FF 2.x.
This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 01:55, Giorgos Keramidas
keram...@ceid.upatras.gr wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others
as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG
I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others
as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG
invokes installation of FF 2.x.
This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the
installation of these graphics programs fails.
Not a huge deal, but
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others
as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG
invokes installation of FF 2.x.
This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and
,
I can't remember the thread name, but it involved Firefox,
as far as I remember.)
Thanks - I took a look around and I see a thread from April -
Firefox3 and dependencies on firefox2,libxul,xulrunner - was that
what you were referring to?
Regardless, I'll try that when I have a few minutes
,
then:
=== libxul-1.9.0.7_3 conflicts with installed package(s):
xulrunner-1.8.0.4_15
They install files into the same place.
Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1).
What to do - to allow firefox2 to be installed along with firefox3?
Will they conflict?
You can set
-1.8.0.4_15
They install files into the same place.
Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1).
What to do - to allow firefox2 to be installed along with firefox3?
Will they conflict?
Is Gecko a really necessary dependence of librsvg2 and mplayer-plugin
if they are invoked only from
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:01:57PM +0300, l...@lena.kiev.ua wrote:
[...]
Is Gecko a really necessary dependence of librsvg2 and mplayer-plugin
if they are invoked only from firefox3? For what?
7.1-PRERELEASE (Oct 20) i386, linux_base-f8-8_11.
You need to replace your xulrunner references in
l...@lena.kiev.ua wrote:
Hi,
I uninstalled firefox 2, installed firefox 3 and use it. Later,
portupgrade of librsvg2 began to build firefox 2 (I aborted it with ^C).
Then I specified
graphics/librsvg2 = WITH_GECKO=xulrunner,
in MAKE_ARGS in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf . Now I'm trying to
? Or I can give some options to
portupgrade to ignore it?
For remove configuration:
cd /usr/ports/www/firefox make rmconfig
or simply remove
/var/db/ports/firefox2 directory
More details: man 7 ports
- --
Best regards,
Simon Phoenix (Phoenix Lab
On 11/5/06, Andriy Babiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to thank to everyone who advised me on how to avoid firefox2 core
dump issue.
The version of nspr was the lastest.
When I disabled an optimization flags in make.conf, re-compiled the kernel,
and portupgrade -f firefox, I got
On Sunday 05 November 2006 16:44, you wrote:
On 11/5/06, Andriy Babiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to thank to everyone who advised me on how to avoid firefox2
core dump issue.
The version of nspr was the lastest.
When I disabled an optimization flags in make.conf, re
Hi all,
I wanted to thank to everyone who advised me on how to avoid firefox2 core
dump issue.
The version of nspr was the lastest.
When I disabled an optimization flags in make.conf, re-compiled the kernel,
and portupgrade -f firefox, I got Firefox running with no problem.
If someone else has
Hello everybody,
After last upgrade of Firefox, it dumps core when I run it. I am not sure, but
the problem might be caused by the additional optimization that I enabled
during configuration.
Now, my attempt to portupgrade -f firefox results in Found saved
configuration - I cannot change this
On Thursday 02 November 2006 23:05, Andriy Babiy wrote:
Hello everybody,
After last upgrade of Firefox, it dumps core when I run it. I am not sure,
but the problem might be caused by the additional optimization that I
enabled during configuration.
Now, my attempt to portupgrade -f firefox
On 11/3/06, Andriy Babiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody,
After last upgrade of Firefox, it dumps core when I run it. I am not sure, but
the problem might be caused by the additional optimization that I enabled
during configuration.
Now, my attempt to portupgrade -f firefox results in
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:32:26AM +, Michael Johnson wrote:
On 11/3/06, Andriy Babiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody,
After last upgrade of Firefox, it dumps core when I run it. I am not sure,
but
the problem might be caused by the additional optimization that I enabled
On 11/3/06, Andriy Babiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, my attempt to portupgrade -f firefox results in Found saved
configuration - I cannot change this option.
Maybe, someone could advise me on how to do it properly? Where is this saved
configuration? Should it be deleted?
18 matches
Mail list logo
