Neil Darlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doing pkg_version recently, I noticed that isc-dhcp3 has been removed from
> the ports collection.
>
> Why should such an important port be removed? I can't see that wide-dhcp
> provides the same degree of functionality e.g. dynamic zone updates with bind
> Doing pkg_version recently, I noticed that isc-dhcp3 has been removed from
> the ports collection.
>
> Why should such an important port be removed? I can't see that wide-dhcp
> provides the same degree of functionality e.g. dynamic zone updates with
bind.
>
It's been split up: net/isc-dhcp3-ser
Hi,
Doing pkg_version recently, I noticed that isc-dhcp3 has been removed from
the ports collection.
Why should such an important port be removed? I can't see that wide-dhcp
provides the same degree of functionality e.g. dynamic zone updates with bind.
Please CC me on responses as I'm not subscr
