drwxr-xr-x 4 master master 512 Mar 16 11:06 db
etc...
So, I guess a link is NOT exactly equivalent to a directory. At least not the
way I am doing it.
I'm guessing I'm making a real newbie mistake, so if anyone can set me
straight, I'd appreciate it.
IMHO you did everything properly, t
In response to John Almberg :
>
> A little more information on this... from the Rails log, I can see
> that a Ruby script in the config directory cannot load ('require') a
> needed file because it can't find it:
>
> /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
> `gem_o
2009/3/16 John Almberg :
>
> On Mar 16, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Erik Trulsson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:22:13AM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
>>>
>>> I always thought that links to real directories were pretty much the
>>> same as real directories, but I've just discovered a situation where
>>
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:47:23AM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Erik Trulsson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:22:13AM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
> >> I always thought that links to real directories were pretty much the
> >> same as real directories, but I'v
On Mar 16, 2009, at 11:47 AM, John Almberg wrote:
On Mar 16, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:22:13AM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
I always thought that links to real directories were pretty much the
same as real directories, but I've just discovered a situat
On Mar 16, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:22:13AM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
I always thought that links to real directories were pretty much the
same as real directories, but I've just discovered a situation where
they are not and I'm wondering if I'm doing
On Mar 16, 2009, at 11:22 AM, John Almberg wrote:
I always thought that links to real directories were pretty much
the same as real directories, but I've just discovered a situation
where they are not and I'm wondering if I'm doing something wrong...
I have a Ruby on Rails application runn
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:22:13AM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
> I always thought that links to real directories were pretty much the
> same as real directories, but I've just discovered a situation where
> they are not and I'm wondering if I'm doing something wrong...
A *soft* link to a direct
I always thought that links to real directories were pretty much the
same as real directories, but I've just discovered a situation where
they are not and I'm wondering if I'm doing something wrong...
I have a Ruby on Rails application running on a FreeBSD server. All
Rails apps use the sam
