Re: mail daemon(s) recomendation request

2004-05-28 Thread David Landgren
Mike Maltese wrote: I'm looking for an smtp daemon that is less complex than sendmail, can use procmail and has some virtusertable equivalent features. Allowing relay based on mx is going to be a requirement for some of the boxes as well. Sendmail is working ok for me, but I'm intersted in

Re: mail daemon(s) recomendation request

2004-05-28 Thread Richard Caley
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joseph Gleason (jg) writes: jg I'm going to check into postfix and maybe qmail. Haven't played with qmail, but we were handed postfix on some managed linux servers. Years of experience with sendmail made me dread learning another monsterous system. Actually I just

mail daemon(s) recomendation request

2004-05-27 Thread Joseph Gleason
I'm looking for an smtp daemon that is less complex than sendmail, can use procmail and has some virtusertable equivalent features. Allowing relay based on mx is going to be a requirement for some of the boxes as well. Sendmail is working ok for me, but I'm intersted in finding something with a

Re: mail daemon(s) recomendation request

2004-05-27 Thread Mike Maltese
I'm looking for an smtp daemon that is less complex than sendmail, can use procmail and has some virtusertable equivalent features. Allowing relay based on mx is going to be a requirement for some of the boxes as well. Sendmail is working ok for me, but I'm intersted in finding something