Re: p5 ports don't respect LOCALBASE

2003-11-16 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Rich Winkel wrote: According to Lowell Gilbert: Rich Winkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The p5 ports seem especially bad about this. I understand the need for perl to be able to find its local packages, so after I There are ways to find perl packages without expecting them in LOCALBASE. --- Sem

Re: p5 ports don't respect LOCALBASE

2003-11-16 Thread Rich Winkel
According to Lowell Gilbert: > Rich Winkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I support various types of servers and workstations which need > > different "local" software sets. I do all my building on one > > machine, so I use LOCALBASE and PKG_DBDIR in /etc/make.conf to > > keep the various conf

Re: p5 ports don't respect LOCALBASE

2003-11-14 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Rich Winkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I support various types of servers and workstations which need > different "local" software sets. I do all my building on one > machine, so I use LOCALBASE and PKG_DBDIR in /etc/make.conf to > keep the various configurations separate. Unfortunately many

p5 ports don't respect LOCALBASE

2003-11-13 Thread Rich Winkel
I support various types of servers and workstations which need different "local" software sets. I do all my building on one machine, so I use LOCALBASE and PKG_DBDIR in /etc/make.conf to keep the various configurations separate. Unfortunately many ports don't respect the LOCALBASE setting and ins