Re: p5 ports don't respect LOCALBASE
According to Lowell Gilbert: Rich Winkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I support various types of servers and workstations which need different local software sets. I do all my building on one machine, so I use LOCALBASE and PKG_DBDIR in /etc/make.conf to keep the various configurations separate. Unfortunately many ports don't respect the LOCALBASE setting and install into /usr/local, even while recording the packing list as being in LOCALBASE! The p5 ports seem especially bad about this. I understand the need for perl to be able to find its local packages, so after I manually fix things up I need to know how to tell perl to look for its stuff under LOCALBASE instead of /usr/local. Can someone tell me? Or alternatively, has someone else found a better way to deal with the whole problem of maintaining different software sets?? This is really a ports question, so I'm redirecting there. Apparently you're dealing with bugs in the ports, but it's hard to be sure without more details. Can you give a specific example? Thanks for the reply! I've had such problems with spamassassin-milter and also apsprint. Rich ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: p5 ports don't respect LOCALBASE
Rich Winkel wrote: According to Lowell Gilbert: Rich Winkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The p5 ports seem especially bad about this. I understand the need for perl to be able to find its local packages, so after I There are ways to find perl packages without expecting them in LOCALBASE. --- Sem. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: p5 ports don't respect LOCALBASE
Rich Winkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I support various types of servers and workstations which need different local software sets. I do all my building on one machine, so I use LOCALBASE and PKG_DBDIR in /etc/make.conf to keep the various configurations separate. Unfortunately many ports don't respect the LOCALBASE setting and install into /usr/local, even while recording the packing list as being in LOCALBASE! The p5 ports seem especially bad about this. I understand the need for perl to be able to find its local packages, so after I manually fix things up I need to know how to tell perl to look for its stuff under LOCALBASE instead of /usr/local. Can someone tell me? Or alternatively, has someone else found a better way to deal with the whole problem of maintaining different software sets?? This is really a ports question, so I'm redirecting there. Apparently you're dealing with bugs in the ports, but it's hard to be sure without more details. Can you give a specific example? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p5 ports don't respect LOCALBASE
I support various types of servers and workstations which need different local software sets. I do all my building on one machine, so I use LOCALBASE and PKG_DBDIR in /etc/make.conf to keep the various configurations separate. Unfortunately many ports don't respect the LOCALBASE setting and install into /usr/local, even while recording the packing list as being in LOCALBASE! The p5 ports seem especially bad about this. I understand the need for perl to be able to find its local packages, so after I manually fix things up I need to know how to tell perl to look for its stuff under LOCALBASE instead of /usr/local. Can someone tell me? Or alternatively, has someone else found a better way to deal with the whole problem of maintaining different software sets?? Thanks!!! Rich ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
