On 10/13/13 17:38, Thomas Mueller wrote:
On the question of playing Adobe Flash in FreeBSD, could one use the MS-Windows
32-bit version with (i386-)Wine?
I plan to try that.
Apparently that won't solve much. The primary issue now with watching
flash movies is the drm - on linux it somehow
On the question of playing Adobe Flash in FreeBSD, could one use the MS-Windows
32-bit version with (i386-)Wine?
I plan to try that.
Tom
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
warning
lights up: lots of dependencies ahead!
When you try to install a simple desktop environment, you'll be
confronted with hundreds of packages to be installed, some of them
you've probably never had thought of in regards of what you need to
install a desktop, such as two or more different
I don't know what others think, but what *I* really want is that the
free software versions of Flash (gnash and klash, etc) work at least as
well as versions of Adobe Flash do, or if versions of Adobe Flash are
to be used, that it will be free and covered by the GPL.
Its unlikely to happen unless
On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 23:28:40 +0100, gct7photogra...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know what others think, but what *I* really want is that the
free software versions of Flash (gnash and klash, etc) work at least as
well as versions of Adobe Flash do, or if versions of Adobe Flash are
to be used,
On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 04:48 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
Let's hope people are going to get smarter than I assume. :-)
It's new, not even 100 years old. Within our lifetimes people likely
become more stupid, but yes, it will take some generations and people
will get smarter.
FreeBSD 9.1
I want ONE shared lib; i.e. rsvg.so, which is provided by
x11-toolkits/py-gnome-desktop.
Unfortunately, it seems that going the normal route I shall have to
install 80! ports to get it. Is there an easier way?
___
On 10/11/13 5:38 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
FreeBSD 9.1
I want ONE shared lib; i.e. rsvg.so, which is provided by
x11-toolkits/py-gnome-desktop.
Unfortunately, it seems that going the normal route I shall have to
install 80! ports to get it. Is there an easier way?
Actually I think you
a simple desktop environment, you'll
be confronted with hundreds of packages to be installed, some
of them you've probably never had thought of in regards of
what you need to install a desktop, such as two or more
different databases, LaTeX, translators, and other surprising
stuff
El día Tuesday, October 08, 2013 a las 03:31:16PM +0200, Matthias Apitz
escribió:
Meanwhile I did:
# cp -Rp ~guru/PKGDIR/mnt
# PKG_PATH=/PKGDIR
# export PKG_PATH
# chroot /mnt pkg_add xorg-7.7
# chroot /mnt pkg_add kde-4.10.5
# chroot /mnt pkg_add vim-7.3.1314
...
# chroot
DESTDIR=/mnt
...
I have compiled ~800 ports (Xorg and KDE4) and after this I've created
packages of all the installed ports with pkg_create(1); the resulting
.tgz files are all as well copied to the image into /mnt/PKGDIR.
So far so good. Now I want install the packages as well into the image
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:16, Matthias Apitz wrote:
So far so good. Now I want install the packages as well into the image
in /mnt. What would be the best method for this? Run pkg_add with the
flag --chroot chrootdir, or use chroot(8) directly? Or any other idea?
Thanks in advance
All
El día Tuesday, October 08, 2013 a las 07:58:06AM -0500, Mark Felder escribió:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:16, Matthias Apitz wrote:
So far so good. Now I want install the packages as well into the image
in /mnt. What would be the best method for this? Run pkg_add with the
flag --chroot
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 8:07, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Tuesday, October 08, 2013 a las 07:58:06AM -0500, Mark Felder
escribió:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:16, Matthias Apitz wrote:
So far so good. Now I want install the packages as well into the image
in /mnt. What would
you use pkg_* or pkg with their built-in chroot options it seems
that it executes those tools within those chroots instead of setting the
chroot as a destination for the installation. So if you wanted to use
--chroot I think you have to make sure the packages are available inside
the chroot
Hi all,
Using freebsd 9.2 amd64 and poudriere, perl fails to build:
/bin/mkdir -p
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/BSDPAN/.
install -o root -g wheel -m 444
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/BSDPAN-2007/BSDPAN.pm
I installed 9.1 from iso image.
Then 'pkg' command brought pkg-1.0.11 package.
Now commands like 'pkg install gnome2' always say:
pkg: Package 'gnome2' was not found in the repositories.
Am I missing something? This is vanilla 9.1 from DVD image. Nothing else.
Yuri
On 17/08/2013 05:41, Yuri wrote:
I installed 9.1 from iso image.
Then 'pkg' command brought pkg-1.0.11 package.
Now commands like 'pkg install gnome2' always say:
pkg: Package 'gnome2' was not found in the repositories.
Am I missing something? This is vanilla 9.1 from DVD image. Nothing
in installed packages within jails. I am
looking for a functionality/port that works like 490.status-
pkg-changes for my host.
Question: is there any functionality within the periodic system or a
port that I might have missed to find?
You can't just run 490.status-pkg-changes directly in your
Hi --
I did migrate to pkgng some month ago, and ever since I am curious how to
monitor changes in installed packages within jails. I am looking for a
functionality/port that works like 490.status-pkg-changes for my host.
Question: is there any functionality within the periodic system
On 20/07/2013 12:09, Michael Grimm wrote:
I did migrate to pkgng some month ago, and ever since I am curious
how to monitor changes in installed packages within jails. I am
looking for a functionality/port that works like 490.status-
pkg-changes for my host.
Question: is there any
On 20.07.2013, at 14:53, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 20/07/2013 12:09, Michael Grimm wrote:
I did migrate to pkgng some month ago, and ever since I am curious
how to monitor changes in installed packages within jails. I am
looking for a functionality/port
Hi all,
I want to mirror binary packages for 8.x amd64 internally on an
isolated network. It appears the appropriate source would be on an
official mirror at pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-8-stable/ for the
most recent updates. However, it does not appear to have been updated
since October
Hi all!
I come from linux os and I read a lot documentations about freebsd.
I've a doubt: when I've some packages installed and I need upgrade it, I
need to recompile those packages or there's another (fast) way to do this?
thanks!
Pol
___
freebsd
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:05:25 +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
Hi all!
I come from linux os and I read a lot documentations about freebsd.
I've a doubt: when I've some packages installed and I need upgrade it, I
need to recompile those packages or there's another (fast) way to do
For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long
waits and/or having to set up a special build machine when creating
small systems. But even though the development server security
breach is now long past, there are no published binary packages for
FreeBSD 9.1. When
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long waits and/or
having to set up a special build machine when creating small systems. But
even though the development server security breach is now long past
On 04/10/2013 20:39, Brett Glass wrote:
For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long waits
and/or having to set up a special build machine when creating small
systems. But even though the development server security breach is now
long past, there are no published binary
Unfortunately, I've never experimented with pkgng, so will have to
come up to speed on
this. Might be a temporary workaround.
In the meantime, I'm trying to install Apache 2.2 on a small
server. So far, just to
build the port, the machine has built Perl, Python, m4, Berkeley
DB, and an
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
Unfortunately, I've never experimented with pkgng, so will have to come up
to speed on
this. Might be a temporary workaround.
it is def. where the project is moving towards for binary pkg
distribution, so it won't be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/10/13 2:19 PM, Brett Glass wrote:
Unfortunately, I've never experimented with pkgng, so will have to
come up to speed on this. Might be a temporary workaround.
In the meantime, I'm trying to install Apache 2.2 on a small
server. So far,
On 4/10/2013 at 11:39 AM Brett Glass wrote:
|For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long
|waits and/or having to set up a special build machine when creating
|small systems. But even though the development server security
|breach is now long past, there are no published
On 04/10/2013 22:19, Mike. wrote:
On 4/10/2013 at 11:39 AM Brett Glass wrote:
|For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long
|waits and/or having to set up a special build machine when creating
|small systems. But even though the development server security
|breach is now long
WITHOUT_X11= yes in /etc/make.conf. In addition to make
config option(s), there may also be some default stuff here and there in the
Mk files. The make.conf line will short circuit these.
IIRC there may be some exceptions where you need some (a handful or less) of
some X related packages. Seem
you need some (a handful or
less)
|of
|some X related packages. Seem to think of things like gd, imagemagick,
|freetype, etc., for PHP kind of things. In these cases, the make.conf
line
|will blanket cover most of what you don't want and you can choose make
|config options that will pull
Just made that into a batch file for my library. Should be a target in
the standard ports Makefile, IMHO. Maybe call it rdistclean. Perhaps
this could be submitted as a PR.
--Brett Glass
At 12:37 PM 4/10/2013, Greg Larkin wrote:
Here's an easy way to delete all of the distfiles for a port and
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:14:21 -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
Just made that into a batch file for my library. Should be a target in
the standard ports Makefile, IMHO. Maybe call it rdistclean. Perhaps
this could be submitted as a PR.
There are various options in portsclean (provided by ports-mgmt/
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 14:57:57 -0400, doug wrote:
My questions: Does/will pkgng work? Are 9.1 packages on the ISO images?
I am in the progess of answering that one for myself but had some time
on my hands during the download :)
Prebuilt packages are on the way apparently, but I have made my own
On 4/5/2013 7:51 AM, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 14:57:57 -0400, doug wrote:
My questions: Does/will pkgng work? Are 9.1 packages on the ISO images?
I am in the progess of answering that one for myself but had some time
on my hands during the download :)
Prebuilt packages
On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 15:25:42 -0500
Joshua Isom jri...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been using FreeBSD since the summer of 2005, I still have the first
cd-r I used. The fact that it's so easy makes me wonder why it hasn't
been done yet. It's been almost five months.
It's easy to build a
. It's been almost five months.
It's easy to build a repository, it's hard to build a secure
public
repository.
Agreed; that's why I haven't attempted to do so. Also, I only build
packages for the 600 or so packages in which I am interested, and only
for the FreeBSD version in use
On 4/6/2013 7:56 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
Agreed; that's why I haven't attempted to do so. Also, I only build
packages for the 600 or so packages in which I am interested, and only
for the FreeBSD version in use, and only for the specific CPU
architecture.
Maybe Joshua is overlooking something
:00
File:src.txz94190 KB12/04/12 10:10:00
This pretty much invalidates 5.4 of the handbook.
My questions: Does/will pkgng work? Are 9.1 packages on the ISO images? I am in
the progess of answering that one for myself but had some time on my hands
during the download
On 4/4/2013 1:57 PM, d...@safeport.com wrote:
Its seems certain that pkg_add is not [going to] be[ing] restored.
Progress is being made on providing pkg_add and pkgng packages again.
They will come back.
Index of ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/9.1-RELEASE/
Name
On 4 Apr 2013, at 21:21, Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 4/4/2013 1:57 PM, d...@safeport.com wrote:
Its seems certain that pkg_add is not [going to] be[ing] restored.
Progress is being made on providing pkg_add and pkgng packages again.
They will come back.
For those who
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Mark Blackman wrote:
On 4 Apr 2013, at 21:21, Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 4/4/2013 1:57 PM, d...@safeport.com wrote:
Its seems certain that pkg_add is not [going to] be[ing] restored.
Progress is being made on providing pkg_add and pkgng packages again
Hey hey :-)
Are there any news on fresh binary packages for 9.1-RELEASE / 9-STABLE? :-)
Best regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On 7 Mar 2013, at 15:52, Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org wrote:
Hi,
I just rented a 9.1-release VPS and was trying to install some packages.
This however does not work as there is no directory packages-9.1-release on
the ftp server (ftp.freebsd.org). Why is this?
If you're prepared
Hi,
I just rented a 9.1-release VPS and was trying to install some packages.
This however does not work as there is no directory packages-9.1-release on
the ftp server (ftp.freebsd.org). Why is this?
ftp pwd
Remote directory: /pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64
ftp ls
229 Entering Extended Passive Mode
Ruben de Groot schreef:
Hi,
I just rented a 9.1-release VPS and was trying to install some packages.
This however does not work as there is no directory packages-9.1-release on
the ftp server (ftp.freebsd.org). Why is this?
ftp pwd
Remote directory: /pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64
ftp ls
229
On 7 mrt 2013, at 16:58, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Ruben de Groot schreef:
Hi,
I just rented a 9.1-release VPS and was trying to install some packages.
This however does not work as there is no directory packages-9.1-release
on the ftp server (ftp.freebsd.org). Why
Hi Guys,
Do you have any idea when are going to be the packages available for FreeBSD
9.1?
thx!
Laszlo
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
newer than those of
9-STABLE packages. I think if I don't get the revision number from
which the 9-STABLE was updated last time I'll use the ports tree that
comes with 9.1-RELEASE. I hope it won't cause much version
incompatibilities.
Um, not really. Or at least, not specific enough to be sure
On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Jeff Tipton jef...@mail.com wrote:
On 02/17/2013 13:13, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 16 Feb 2013, at 16:56, Jeff Tipton jef...@mail.com wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded 9.0 - 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there are
no packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my
On 16 Feb 2013, at 16:56, Jeff Tipton jef...@mail.com wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded 9.0 - 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there are no
packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and packages at the
RELEASE versions, so I only have to compile when I need non-default
On 02/17/2013 13:13, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 16 Feb 2013, at 16:56, Jeff Tipton jef...@mail.com wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded 9.0 - 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there are no
packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and packages at the RELEASE
versions, so I only
Hi,
I upgraded 9.0 - 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there
are no packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and
packages at the RELEASE versions, so I only have to compile when I need
non-default options or when there are no packages. Would it be possible
to get
On 2/10/2013 8:57 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 22:52:37 -0800 (PST), Dánielisz László wrote:
Hi Everybody,
Do you have any idea how can I list those installed packages
that are not required by any other?
You can use sysutils/pkg_cutleaves to determine those.
I use
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On 2/10/2013 8:57 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 22:52:37 -0800 (PST), Dánielisz László wrote:
Hi Everybody,
Do you have any idea how can I list those installed packages
that are not required by any other?
You can use sysutils
On 2/10/2013 3:09 PM, Teske, Devin wrote:
Just curious, why not use pkg_info -Ra instead of pkg_info -R '*' ?
Because I didnt know -a;)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2013 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: packages listing
On 2/10/2013 3:09 PM, Teske, Devin wrote:
Just curious, why not use pkg_info -Ra instead of pkg_info -R '*' ?
Because I didnt know -a;)
___
freebsd-questions
Hi Everybody,
Do you have any idea how can I list those installed packages that are not
required by any other?
Thx!
Laszlo
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 22:52:37 -0800 (PST), Dánielisz László wrote:
Hi Everybody,
Do you have any idea how can I list those installed packages
that are not required by any other?
You can use sysutils/pkg_cutleaves to determine those.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since
pkg_tree -t -q
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Dánielisz László
laszlo_daniel...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Everybody,
Do you have any idea how can I list those installed packages that are not
required by any other?
Thx!
Laszlo
___
freebsd-questions
Hi All,
If anyone has interest, I have a new blog post on building a FreeBSD
release with custom packages at
http://blog.hostileadmin.com/2012/10/08/building-freebsd-media-with-custom-packages/
--
Take care
Rick Miller
___
freebsd-questions
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:38:33 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
I always keep saying the ideal
situation would be that you could customise and compile just your own
really mission critical software and freely mix that with installing
pre-compiled packages of anything else from the public
pre-compiled packages of anything else from the public repositories.
To be honest, that's what I'm doing for many years now. I
tend to compile only those ports where it is either required
in order to obtain the software because no suitable package
does exist (e. g. OpenOffice), or because I
HI,
OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide
package for LAME the same way as OpenBSD does?
Regards,
vermaden
--
...
___
freebsd-questions
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote:
HI,
OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide
package for LAME the same way as OpenBSD does?
j00 CAN haz pakagez. =^_^=
Packages for _everything_ is impossible because
Hai ;)
Polytropon free...@edvax.de:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote:
HI,
OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide
package for LAME the same way as OpenBSD does?
j00 CAN haz pakagez. =^_^=
Packages
... I even got a screenshot of how these *flavours*
and *subpackages* work, here:
http://ompldr.org/vZjV2bQ
Polytropon free...@edvax.de pisze:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote:
HI,
OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
for LAME (audio/lame), why
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 22:54:52 +0200, vermaden wrote:
Polytropon free...@edvax.de:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote:
HI,
OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide
package for LAME the same way
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:27:54PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 23:27:54 +0200
From: Polytropon free...@edvax.de
Subject: Re: I Can Has Packages?
To: vermaden verma...@interia.pl
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld
Polytropon == Polytropon free...@edvax.de writes:
Polytropon I just assume providing packages for every imaginable
Polytropon combination requires lots of resources. As an example
Polytropon take OpenOffice: Every language variant, then integration
Polytropon with KDE, Gnome, or none of them
On 20/08/2012 04:07, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Polytropon == Polytropon free...@edvax.de writes:
Polytropon I just assume providing packages for every imaginable
Polytropon combination requires lots of resources. As an example
Polytropon take OpenOffice: Every language variant
I have tried the available package update methods. It occurred to me to
experiment with a different way.
I am working on a package update script in Python as an alternate way to
update installed packages with latest available on the FreeBSD web site. It
parses the index page of the web site
, did the fetch and extract again, problem
persists still.
Yes, i searched all the forums and read a lot about managing ports and
packages.
Right now i am stuck.
So, how do i delete really *all* ports and *all* packages at once?
Is it possible with doing a fectch and extract having the latest ports?
I
software
package.
I deleted the whole ports-dir, did the fetch and extract again, problem
persists still.
Yep. I hope you can see from what I wrote above how doing that wouldn't
solve the problem you are seeing.
Yes, i searched all the forums and read a lot about managing ports and
packages
On Sat, 19 May 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
That's a bit drastic and pretty much something you'ld never actually
want to do in normal usage. However, for completeness' sake:
# pkg_delete -af
will remove all installed ports. After doing that there should be
hardly anything left under
On 19/05/2012 16:07, Warren Block wrote:
The -f is probably not needed. I've done this rarely enough to not
recall, but -a should sort everything in the right order so dependencies
are uninstalled in order.
I find that 'pkg_delete -af' gives more reliable results. Agreed, it
should not be
Ok, many thanks for your replies.
I forgot to tell that i recently upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0-RELEASE.
That excplains maybe why i had obsolete/old packages/ports on my disk.
The problem i had was that gdm, gnome didnt start after the upgrade.
So i tried to build the gnome and gdm thing again via
On Sat, 19 May 2012 11:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Beastie-Boy wrote:
Ok, many thanks for your replies.
I forgot to tell that i recently upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0-RELEASE.
That excplains maybe why i had obsolete/old packages/ports on my disk.
When you cross a major OS release boundary, you need
On Sat, 19 May 2012 19:43:09 +0100, RW wrote:
On Sat, 19 May 2012 11:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Beastie-Boy wrote:
Ok, many thanks for your replies.
I forgot to tell that i recently upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0-RELEASE.
That excplains maybe why i had obsolete/old packages/ports on my disk.
When
On 19/05/2012 20:08, Beastie-Boy wrote:
I forgot to tell that i recently upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0-RELEASE.
That excplains maybe why i had obsolete/old packages/ports on my disk.
Ahah! That is exactly the situation where you do want to remove all your
installed ports and rebuild them
On Sat, 19 May 2012 11:08:19 -0700 (PDT), Beastie-Boy wrote:
Ok, many thanks for your replies.
I forgot to tell that i recently upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0-RELEASE.
That excplains maybe why i had obsolete/old packages/ports on my disk.
When you do such an update (major version number), you should
On 19/05/2012 21:09, Polytropon wrote:
Sorry i cant paste logs, bsd is running on another machine.
You can use SSH to log into the BSD machine and cut text from
the session. :-)
Or just run:
% script /tmp/session.log
Do all your updating tasks, then type 'exit' when done, and you'll get
On Sat, 19 May 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 19 May 2012 11:08:19 -0700 (PDT), Beastie-Boy wrote:
Ok, many thanks for your replies.
I forgot to tell that i recently upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0-RELEASE.
That excplains maybe why i had obsolete/old packages/ports on my disk.
When you do
I'm happy to use the -P option to let portmaster use packages for most
of my ports but there's a few that must be compiled from the port
instead because I need to configure non default options, e.g. to enable
GIMP plugin support in graphics/xsane
Is there any way of forcing portmaster
--On May 8, 2012 9:33:59 PM +0100 Mike Clarke jmc-freeb...@milibyte.co.uk
wrote:
I'm happy to use the -P option to let portmaster use packages for most
of my ports but there's a few that must be compiled from the port
instead because I need to configure non default options, e.g. to enable
On Tuesday 08 May 2012, John Webster wrote:
Would this work for you? From the manpage:
For those who wish to be sure that specific ports are always
compiled instead of being installed from packages the
PT_NO_INSTALL_PACKAGE vari- able can be defined in the make(1)
environment, perhaps
--On May 8, 2012 10:51:16 PM +0100 Mike Clarke jmc-freeb...@milibyte.co.uk
wrote:
On Tuesday 08 May 2012, John Webster wrote:
Would this work for you? From the manpage:
For those who wish to be sure that specific ports are always
compiled instead of being installed from packages
2012-02-01 19:16, David Jackson skrev:
I did not save them, there is really no way to save a copy of them unless I
copy them by hand.
I take it you are new to FreeBSD. May I introduce you to script
man script(1)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
One thing I noticed, which may cause some trouble(?)
http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-10-current/ is
empty, no packages. So pkg_add fails for everything...
Running 10-CURRENT I have to set PACKAGESITE
to http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub
a
RELEASE perhaps you don't know that the packages are frozen but all
are known to work without problems. Switch to -STABLE if you want
access newer packages but perhaps there will be problems with them
from time to time. Check -stable maillist.
HTH
and resource cost
problems, it offers far too much opportunity for people up-to-no-good to
be able to introduce trojans, spyware and so forth.
No no, i didn't said i will make them manually, i wanted to said that
i can add one server amd64 to the pool of automate servers that make
the packages, i
one server amd64 to the pool of automate servers that make the
packages, i think it works automatically and distribute workload like boinc
or other similar net. About the people which introduce trojans, rootkits
etc... i didn't think on that issue and is really a very important stopper
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
2012-01-31 01:13,
freebsd-lists-erik@**erikosterholm.orgfreebsd-lists-e...@erikosterholm.orgskrev:
Oh come on, guys. David is the same person who said that FreeBSD was
poorly documented.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
2012-01-30 18:52, David Jackson skrev:
I have tried endlessly to no avail to upgrade binary the packages on
Freebsd to the latest version. I have tried:
*portupgrade -PP -a
*portmaster -PP -a
*pkg_update
All
.
There are, I think... at least 10 languages available, and combine this
with Gnome, KDE and CUPS support OFF or ON, and you have 10*2*2*2 = 80
packages, and still no scheme to name them. :-)
Don't forget compiling for multiple architectures. That adds more
options -- and, unlike some of those other
and people
are needed to maintain a package system up-to-date. I have a free
server (amd64 freebsd8.2p6), if i built all packages with their
standard options, that's without make config, Can i upload them to
the official package ftp? Should i make my own un-official ftp
package server to allow
1 - 100 of 1294 matches
Mail list logo
