On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 03:42:05PM +0200, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> On 10/31/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:11:17PM +0200, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> >> On 10/31/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:24:03
On 10/31/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:11:17PM +0200, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> On 10/31/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:24:03AM -0500, Timothy Parker wrote:
> >> Hello
> >> I am currebtly using the 2.12 pac
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:11:17PM +0200, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> On 10/31/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:24:03AM -0500, Timothy Parker wrote:
> >> Hello
> >> I am currebtly using the 2.12 package port for Gnome. (My processor is
> >in
> >> bad shap
On 10/31/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:24:03AM -0500, Timothy Parker wrote:
> Hello
> I am currebtly using the 2.12 package port for Gnome. (My processor is
in
> bad shape and can't handle most source builds without shutting down.)
> What are the plans f
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:24:03AM -0500, Timothy Parker wrote:
> Hello
> I am currebtly using the 2.12 package port for Gnome. (My processor is in
> bad shape and can't handle most source builds without shutting down.)
> What are the plans for making 2.14 and 2.16 available as binary packages?
Wh
Hello
I am currebtly using the 2.12 package port for Gnome. (My processor is in
bad shape and can't handle most source builds without shutting down.)
What are the plans for making 2.14 and 2.16 available as binary packages?
Thanks
--
Timothy Parker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
