On 02 Jan Vizion wrote:
> >
> >>Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >It wont change by itself.
>
> Sure -- but it must have been changed automatically on my system during
> a package installation process- I certainly made no manual or other
> entries in it and noone else has root access.
I know
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in response to
>>Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I will write a short script to check for changes in pkgtools.conf and
>> run it both before and after portupgrade is run. That way I will at
>> least have a handle on what is going on.
>
>It wont change by itself.
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 2:35:20 -0800
Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will write a short script to check for changes in pkgtools.conf and
> run it both before and after portupgrade is run. That way I will at
> least have a handle on what is going on.
>
It wont change by itself.
Re: portupgrade - skipping -held by user- meaning?
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Merritt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 2:22 AM
> To: Vizion
> Subject: Re: portupgrade - skipping -held by user- meaning?
>
>
> At 01:40 AM 1
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sahil Tandon
> Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 3:36 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: portupgrade - skipping -held by user- meaning?
>
>
> Vizion wrot
Vizion wrote:
What does it mean when the message
---> skipping [portname] because it is held by user (specify -f to force)
Does said port appear in the HOLD_PKGS array within pkgtools.conf? From
that file:
# HOLD_PKGS: array
#
# This is a list of ports you don't want portupgrade(1) to
I do not understand this:
What does it mean when the message
---> skipping [portname] because it is held by user (specify -f to force)
and when & why should -f be specify?
David
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
