thanks for the link. although this wasn't the interview i was referring to the
announcement is great news.
i don't quite understand though why there's the need to create a completely
new bug tracking system. is this due to technical issues or rather a matter of
not wanting to use what all the
Hi, Alexander
Please note that as I am replying to your questions, I am in no
position to do so. I do not (nor do I wish to appear to) represent
the FreeBSD project in the respect your questions are asked.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 5:07 AM, Alexander
Bestalexbes...@math.uni-muenster.de wrote:
In a BSDTalk podcast interviewing a few of the core team members, this
topic was brought up, and explained in some detail [1]. The situation
[1] -
http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/2009/05/bsdtalk173-few-freebsd-core-team.html
The wrong podcast was referenced. The correct one is:
i remember reading an interview with a fbsd maintainer where he stated that
nobody's happy with the old GNATS bug tracking system, but since it works
they're keeping it.
why not move to bugzilla or another bug tracking system? most of them come
with GNATS_2_* scripts.
switching from cvs to svn
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Alexander
Bestalexbes...@math.uni-muenster.de wrote:
i remember reading an interview with a fbsd maintainer where he stated that
nobody's happy with the old GNATS bug tracking system, but since it works
they're keeping it.
why not move to bugzilla or another