>On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 02:37:36PM -0400, Dave [Hawk-Systems] wrote:
>> I received an answer to this before and it was that FreeBSD isn't
>vulnerable to
>> this type of attack, but the log entries persist in varrying degrees of
>> reoccurance.
>
>This is a FAQ. It's an attempt to exploit an old L
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 02:37:36PM -0400, Dave [Hawk-Systems] wrote:
> I received an answer to this before and it was that FreeBSD isn't vulnerable to
> this type of attack, but the log entries persist in varrying degrees of
> reoccurance.
This is a FAQ. It's an attempt to exploit an old Linux vu
I received an answer to this before and it was that FreeBSD isn't vulnerable to
this type of attack, but the log entries persist in varrying degrees of
reoccurance.
Jul 6 12:48:52 isp2 rpc.statd: invalid hostname to sm_stat:
^X÷ÿ¿^X÷ÿ¿^Y÷ÿ¿^Y÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^[÷ÿ¿^[÷ÿ¿%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%
