Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hi Brent,
Hey Odhiambo
Long time no hear! Hope you are good.
All good.
Why are you asking about this when it is so clearly documented?
I know its documented. Having used debian for x amount of years, think
its time to add *BSD to my repertoire and too see
Hi
I would like to know, in production envs, or anything for that matter,
may I ask how many of you raise the securelevel.
If so, to what do you raise it to.
Kind Regards
Brent Clark
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Brent Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I would like to know, in production envs, or anything for that matter, may I
ask how many of you raise the securelevel.
If so, to what do you raise it to.
Hi Brent,
Long time no hear! Hope you are good.
Why are you
On 8/28/05, Tom Norris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand the things like not allowing the system clock to change and
not allowing formatting of filesystems, but I want to know why you can't
run x11 when you have a securelevel greater than or equal to one. there
is no _serious_ reason I
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 12:59:36PM +0400, Dmitry Mityugov wrote:
On 8/28/05, Tom Norris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand the things like not allowing the system clock to change and
not allowing formatting of filesystems, but I want to know why you can't
run x11 when you have a
I understand the things like not allowing the system clock to change and
not allowing formatting of filesystems, but I want to know why you can't
run x11 when you have a securelevel greater than or equal to one. there
is no _serious_ reason I wish to know, I'm just curious and google keeps
Some time ago, I mused upon the possibility of running Xorg in a
securelevel 0 environment (and I forgot to thank Lowell Gilbert
for his advice, sorry!).
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-December/069141.html
I actually tried it on a test machine about five minutes ago
On Friday 28 January 2005 01:13, markzero wrote:
securelevel is raised before xdm can start which causes fireworks.
just a thought: if you raise the securelevel after xdm has started and it
dies, would you get fireworks again?
--
/Xian
Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by
securelevel is raised before xdm can start which causes fireworks.
just a thought: if you raise the securelevel after xdm has started and it
dies, would you get fireworks again?
I'm leaving the text consoles open for that very reason. If xdm dies,
tries to restart (it will try every 30
Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to push my securelevel up to 1 in order to better enforce
my security policy (protecting chflags, kernel modules etc) but this
of course would break Xorg as it requires access to /dev/io. I've
heard that it's possible to run Xorg via xdm whilst the
Hello.
I realise this may have been covered before and that this may not
be the correct list (freebsd-x11 seemed to be more about developement
rather than configuration) but anyway:
I would like to push my securelevel up to 1 in order to better enforce
my security policy (protecting chflags,
11 matches
Mail list logo
