Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-03 Thread William Bulley
According to Brad Mettee bmet...@pchotshots.com on Mon, 02/02/09 at 15:55: Does an XP machine also detect it as 960MB? If not, can you put more than 960M on it and verify that it's all intact? Yes, Windows XP sees it as a 960MB FAT16 drive. And when formatting it under Windows XP it never

Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-03 Thread William Bulley
According to Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com on Mon, 02/02/09 at 15:29: newfs_msdos(8) Learned something new there. Thanks! It's generally not useful to slice/partition a small SD card. Without a slice table, the whole device is just one slice. Agreed. I just want a big chuck of

Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-03 Thread William Bulley
According to Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com on Mon, 02/02/09 at 18:13: Nobody's blamed the SD/CF reader. I call dibs to blame the SD/CF reader. Isolate the problem to find the culprit... Check the USB reader -- I'm curious to see if that fixes the problem. This is a FANTASTIC suggestion -

Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-03 Thread William Bulley
According to Mike Jeays mike.je...@rogers.com on Mon, 02/02/09 at 19:38: I think I would try dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=1M without the count option, and see how many blocks it writes. You at least start with a clean slate, and can run fdisk and newfs, if you want a BSD-only device.

Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-03 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 07:37:05AM -0500, William Bulley wrote: According to Mike Jeays mike.je...@rogers.com on Mon, 02/02/09 at 19:38: I think I would try dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=1M without the count option, and see how many blocks it writes. You at least start with a clean

short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-02 Thread William Bulley
Recently purchased a brand new 2.0 GB secure digital (SD) card. When I plugged this into a USB dongle and plugged the USB dongle into an available USB socket on my FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE system the output from dmesg(8) reported this: da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) This is

Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-02 Thread Mel
On Monday 02 February 2009 07:52:44 William Bulley wrote: Recently purchased a brand new 2.0 GB secure digital (SD) card. When I plugged this into a USB dongle and plugged the USB dongle into an available USB socket on my FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE system the output from dmesg(8) reported this:

Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-02 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:56:19PM -0500, William Bulley wrote: According to Mel fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net on Mon, 02/02/09 at 12:46: On Monday 02 February 2009 07:52:44 William Bulley wrote: Recently purchased a brand new 2.0 GB secure digital (SD) card. When I plugged

Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-02 Thread William Bulley
According to Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu on Mon, 02/02/09 at 14:12: I am a little lost here and haven't tried a lot on USB devices yet - though I haven't had these kind of problems. But, after doing the fdisk stuff and before trying to mount, did you do a newfs? Another thing

Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-02 Thread Wojciech Puchar
da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) it's something wrong with FreeBSD here, it gets detected as 1GB. it has nothing to do with filesystem on it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-02 Thread Brad Mettee
Grrr - I really don't like that this mailing list default Reply-To is the original author instead of the mailing list itself Snip from mis-directed e-mail Does an XP machine also detect it as 960MB? If not, can you put more than 960M on it and verify that it's all intact? Create a

Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-02 Thread William Bulley
According to Mel fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net on Mon, 02/02/09 at 12:46: On Monday 02 February 2009 07:52:44 William Bulley wrote: Recently purchased a brand new 2.0 GB secure digital (SD) card. When I plugged this into a USB dongle and plugged the USB dongle into an available

Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-02 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:27:20PM -0500, William Bulley wrote: According to Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu on Mon, 02/02/09 at 14:12: I am a little lost here and haven't tried a lot on USB devices yet - though I haven't had these kind of problems. But, after doing the fdisk stuff

Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-02 Thread Tim Judd
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote: da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) it's something wrong with FreeBSD here, it gets detected as 1GB. it has nothing to do with filesystem on it. Nobody's blamed the SD/CF reader. I

Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-02 Thread Warren Block
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, William Bulley wrote: Thanks. According to the newfs(8) man page it is used only for BSD style file systems (ufs and ufs2). newfs_msdos(8) I am okay with the FAT16 formatted SD card, I'm just upset that I paid for a 2.0 GB card and ended up with what seems to be a 1.0

Re: short-changed on SD card?

2009-02-02 Thread Mike Jeays
On February 2, 2009 06:13:16 pm Tim Judd wrote: On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote: da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) it's something wrong with FreeBSD here, it gets detected as 1GB. it has nothing to do with