Re: signal 4 during buildworlds

2003-08-14 Thread Jon-Eirik Pettersen
> Hey,
>
> I'm getting sig 4 (core dumped) trying to buildworld.  The has occurred 3
times now,
> at different places in the build.
>
> I'm used to seeing unreliable hardware cause sig 11's like this.  But this
has been
> a sig 4 each time.  Can someone interpret this for me?  Should I interpret
the sig 4
> the same as I would sig 11?
>
> --
> Bill Moran
> Potential Technologies
> http://www.potentialtech.com
>
I used to get that before I upgraded BIOS. I will recommend you to do the
same. Its a software-bug in some VIA-chipsets that can cause this.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: signal 4 during buildworlds

2003-08-14 Thread Mike Tancsa
Are you using CPU optimizations not appropriate for your CPU ?

What is in /etc/make.conf

and what type of hardware do you have ?

You will get these sorts of errors if you try and use say i686 or AMD 
specific instructions on a ITX or 486 CPU.

---Mike

At 12:36 PM 11/08/2003 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Hey,

I'm getting sig 4 (core dumped) trying to buildworld.  The has occurred 3 
times now,
at different places in the build.

I'm used to seeing unreliable hardware cause sig 11's like this.  But this 
has been
a sig 4 each time.  Can someone interpret this for me?  Should I interpret 
the sig 4
the same as I would sig 11?

--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: signal 4 during buildworlds

2003-08-14 Thread Joshua Oreman
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 12:36:26PM -0400 or thereabouts, Bill Moran wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> I'm getting sig 4 (core dumped) trying to buildworld.  The has occurred 3 
> times now,
> at different places in the build.
> 
> I'm used to seeing unreliable hardware cause sig 11's like this.  But this 
> has been
> a sig 4 each time.  Can someone interpret this for me?  Should I interpret 
> the sig 4
> the same as I would sig 11?

Signal 4  is SIGILL.
Signal 11 is SIGSEGV.

Same difference (okay, not really, but treat it the same).

-- Josh

> 
> -- 
> Bill Moran
> Potential Technologies
> http://www.potentialtech.com
> 
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


signal 4 during buildworlds

2003-08-14 Thread Bill Moran
Hey,

I'm getting sig 4 (core dumped) trying to buildworld.  The has occurred 3 times now,
at different places in the build.
I'm used to seeing unreliable hardware cause sig 11's like this.  But this has been
a sig 4 each time.  Can someone interpret this for me?  Should I interpret the sig 4
the same as I would sig 11?
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: signal 4 during buildworlds

2003-08-14 Thread Bill Moran
Mike Tancsa wrote:
Are you using CPU optimizations not appropriate for your CPU ?
You sure know your shit.

Yeah, I took a look at /etc/make.conf ... and (like an idiot) I
set the CPU type to P4 when it's just a Celeron.
Oops ...

What is in /etc/make.conf

and what type of hardware do you have ?

You will get these sorts of errors if you try and use say i686 or AMD 
specific instructions on a ITX or 486 CPU.

---Mike

At 12:36 PM 11/08/2003 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:

Hey,

I'm getting sig 4 (core dumped) trying to buildworld.  The has 
occurred 3 times now,
at different places in the build.

I'm used to seeing unreliable hardware cause sig 11's like this.  But 
this has been
a sig 4 each time.  Can someone interpret this for me?  Should I 
interpret the sig 4
the same as I would sig 11?

--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"






--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"