supfile tag to use? port/src

2004-02-09 Thread Drew
Greetings,

I am a little confused by what the website says and
what the example supfiles have.  

I have two questions. 

1. When do I use tag=.?  T he website says only use
this for ports, but in my
/usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile the tag is
set to tag=..   I thought tag=. was saying 'gimme
the lastest thing available', but I could be mistaken.

2.  I am running 5.2-CURRENT and I want to upgrade to
5.2.1, must I change my tag to RELENG_5_2_1? or can I
use tag=., which as I understand it is suspossed to
be equal to CURRENT.  Isn't 5.2.1 now CURRENT? 

Thank you for your time in advance,

-D

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: supfile tag to use? port/src

2004-02-09 Thread Julien Gabel
 I am a little confused by what the website says and
 what the example supfiles have.

 1. When do I use tag=.?  T he website says only use
 this for ports, but in my
 /usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile the tag is
 set to tag=..   I thought tag=. was saying 'gimme
 the lastest thing available', but I could be mistaken.

You are right.
/usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile is more... explicit :)

 2.  I am running 5.2-CURRENT and I want to upgrade to
 5.2.1, must I change my tag to RELENG_5_2_1? or can I
 use tag=., which as I understand it is suspossed to
 be equal to CURRENT.  Isn't 5.2.1 now CURRENT?

For FreeBSD-5.2 security fix branch, you can use the RELENG_5_2
tag according to the Handbook:
  http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook\
  /cvs-tags.html

5.2.1 is not here right now.

-- 
-jg.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: supfile tag to use? port/src

2004-02-09 Thread Drew

 
 You are right.
 /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile is more...
 explicit :)
 

What do you mean?  The handbook says don't use tag=.,
except for ports, but the standard file has such. 
Which is it?  Use it or don't?  And if I do what
branch will I be getting? 

  

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook\
   /cvs-tags.html
 
 5.2.1 is not here right now.
 

Looking at that url I see two tags of note: RELENG_5_2
and RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE.  is the _RELEASE tag just
the 5.2.1 as it was released and no updates since?  Is
RELENG_5_2 current ie = 5.2.1?  

What I don't understand is what tag I should use to
follow the 5.X series.  Must I change the tag
everytime a new version comes out?  Is there not a tag
I can use that get the lastest in the 5.x CURRENT
series always?  

Thanks, 

-D

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: supfile tag to use? port/src

2004-02-09 Thread Alex de Kruijff
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 10:21:48AM -0800, Drew wrote:
 
  
  You are right.
  /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile is more...
  explicit :)
  
 
 What do you mean?  The handbook says don't use tag=.,
 except for ports, but the standard file has such. 
 Which is it?  Use it or don't?  And if I do what
 branch will I be getting? 
 
   
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook\
/cvs-tags.html
  
  5.2.1 is not here right now.
  
 
 Looking at that url I see two tags of note: RELENG_5_2
 and RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE.  is the _RELEASE tag just
 the 5.2.1 as it was released and no updates since?  Is
 RELENG_5_2 current ie = 5.2.1?  
 
 What I don't understand is what tag I should use to
 follow the 5.X series.  Must I change the tag
 everytime a new version comes out?  Is there not a tag
 I can use that get the lastest in the 5.x CURRENT
 series always?  
 
Like you wrote: tag=. mean get me the latest. The reason this isn't 
advisable is because a bug can easly kill you system. I would advise 
you to use the RELENG_5_2 (i.e. 5.2 + updates) and change when the next 
version comes out. There aren't going to be any 5.2.1 unleas there's a 
good reason for. (The last FreeBSD version out of the 4.x brange that 
has this was 4.6)

-- 
Alex

Articles based on solutions that I use:
http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: supfile tag to use? port/src SOLVED

2004-02-09 Thread Drew
Thank you very much to everyone that replied.  I
understand the differences.  Best to go with a RELENG_
entry.

Thanks again, the freebsd community rocks! 

-D

 Like you wrote: tag=. mean get me the latest. The
 reason this isn't 
 advisable is because a bug can easly kill you
 system. I would advise 
 you to use the RELENG_5_2 (i.e. 5.2 + updates) and
 change when the next 
 version comes out. There aren't going to be any
 5.2.1 unleas there's a 
 good reason for. (The last FreeBSD version out of
 the 4.x brange that 
 has this was 4.6)
 
 -- 
 Alex
 
 Articles based on solutions that I use:

http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: supfile tag to use? port/src

2004-02-09 Thread Julien Gabel
 You are right.
 /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile is more...
 explicit :)

 What do you mean?  The handbook says don't use tag=.,
 except for ports, but the standard file has such.
 Which is it?  Use it or don't?  And if I do what
 branch will I be getting?

The standard-supfile is for -CURRENT aka the HEAD or . in
cvsup(1) terminology. It seems not to be what you want here (?).

In the stable-supfile you can read...
  # The following line is for 4-stable. If you want 3-stable or
  # 2.2-stable, change RELENG_4 to RELENG_3 or RELENG_2_2
  # respectively.
  *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4
... which is very different from . and although more clear.

 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook\
   /cvs-tags.html

 5.2.1 is not here right now.

 Looking at that url I see two tags of note: RELENG_5_2
 and RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE.  is the _RELEASE tag just
 the 5.2.1 as it was released and no updates since?  Is
 RELENG_5_2 current ie = 5.2.1?

If you want o stick with:
  * 5.2-RELEASE, use tag RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE
  * 5.2 security and fixes (-p?), use RELENG_5_2

 What I don't understand is what tag I should use to
 follow the 5.X series.  Must I change the tag
 everytime a new version comes out?  Is there not a tag
 I can use that get the lastest in the 5.x CURRENT
 series always?

HEAD is . is -CURRENT. But if you want to use this branch
be sure to read carefully :
  http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook\
  /current-stable.html

-- 
-jg.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]