Gary Kline wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 08:16:57 Chad Perrin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:20:47AM -0500, William Bulley wrote:
According to Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Before you go down this road too far, you should take a look at Python
as an implementation language. If what
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 08:16:57 Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:20:47AM -0500, William Bulley wrote:
> > According to Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Before you go down this road too far, you should take a look at Python
> > > as an implementation language. If what you'
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:20:47AM -0500, William Bulley wrote:
> According to Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Before you go down this road too far, you should take a look at Python
> > as an implementation language. If what you're doing involves text and
> > string manipulation, Python
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> On 08:29:19 Feb 19, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> > You bet, Perl is terrific. But, Perl is also harder to maintain and
> > less readable in the long run (IMHO and many others' too). Language
> > wars are silly, of course, one uses the right tool
On 08:29:19 Feb 19, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> You bet, Perl is terrific. But, Perl is also harder to maintain and
> less readable in the long run (IMHO and many others' too). Language
> wars are silly, of course, one uses the right tools for the right
> job. But as I said, having programmed fairly w
William Bulley wrote:
According to Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Before you go down this road too far, you should take a look at Python
as an implementation language. If what you're doing involves text and
string manipulation, Python is loaded with good modules that will make
your task a sna
According to Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Before you go down this road too far, you should take a look at Python
> as an implementation language. If what you're doing involves text and
> string manipulation, Python is loaded with good modules that will make
> your task a snap. Having code
Gary Kline wrote:
Giorgos, Joe, Paul , and Tim,
Thanks for your insights today, gentlemen. I began on what may be a very
worthwhile [ and reasonably small, *thankfully*] program that may benefit
everybody who reads text online. Or off, for that matter. I was using
a shareware version that k
Giorgos, Joe, Paul , and Tim,
Thanks for your insights today, gentlemen. I began on what may be a very
worthwhile [ and reasonably small, *thankfully*] program that may benefit
everybody who reads text online. Or off, for that matter. I was using
a shareware version that kept annoying me to
