Chris Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Ryan Dooley wrote:
>
> > Has anybody done work on Tree-based quotas for UFS/UFS2? As an
> > administrator I'm finding more and more reasons that such a thing
> > would be a good thing.
>
The
> By tree-based you mean the ability to define "this directory and
> everything under it gets X amount of storage, regardless of owner"?
> If so, I also wish this ability existed, and I've talked with several
> administrators of ISPs that sorely need that ability as well. If it
> is a monumental
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Ryan Dooley wrote:
> Has anybody done work on Tree-based quotas for UFS/UFS2? As an
> administrator I'm finding more and more reasons that such a thing
> would be a good thing.
By tree-based you mean the ability to define "this directory and
everyth
Hey,
Has anybody done work on Tree-based quotas for UFS/UFS2? As an
administrator I'm finding more and more reasons that such a thing would
be a good thing.
Cheers,
Ryan
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
