My bad. Posted prior reading everything carefully.
Thanks all for correcting me.
Zoran
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Do I read this advisory correctly: it does not affect 9.3?
Zoran
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Can you point to that for the rest of us? I'd rather not wade in
openbsd-misc
The link original poster presented is the correct one.
Openbsd tend to set some default values, which one might
like or not. I would disable root login at first.
Misc seems rough at moment. I found it very
In fact, you got answer on openbsd misc list.
Zoran
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
The first part of that statement is false. The dns/unbound port was
fixed for CVE-2014-8602 on 9 December. Thus a valid work around is to
disable local_unbound and use ports/dns/unbound.
To ask explicitelly: this does not affect 9.3?
I see no unbound nor local_unbound on stock install.
This is weird as I now get a thing that Directory's required to be removed
... and that directory is / will this be fixed as this is kinda scary
seeing Directory couldn't be removed rmdir / or something it showed.
I had a problem using freebsd-update to 9.3-p6.
I had to use it twice to
Systems running a RELEASE version of FreeBSD on the i386 or amd64
platforms can be updated via the freebsd-update(8) utility:
# freebsd-update fetch
# freebsd-update install
No need to recompile the kernel?
Zoran
___
Sorry to make a mistake, regarding the subject!!!
Systems running a RELEASE version of FreeBSD on the i386 or amd64
platforms can be updated via the freebsd-update(8) utility:
# freebsd-update fetch
# freebsd-update install
This is the question, I was intended to ask, since
the patch
The advisory solution offers 3 options... freebsd-update is the binary
approach (option #3) that provides you a new updated generic kernel
already compiled. If you aren't using a generic kernel or want to patch
and recompile your own, then you would use the option #2.
Hm! I use custom
Unfortunately, I don't think your custom kernel got the patch.
I made a mess out of this patch, that is for sure.
On laptop I previously used freebsd-update for openssl
advisory. Now I followed your advice and used patch way.
Recompiled a kernel and got p1. I expected p2. However.
On desktop, I
$ freebsd-version -k # means: kernel
10.0-RELEASE-p7
$ freebsd-version -u # means: userland
10.0-RELEASE-p8
$ freebsd-version# no option means: userland
10.0-RELEASE-p8
I have no freebsd-version on 9.3. Something on 10 only?
Uname has -K and -U, but it is not it.
Best regards
I used freebsd-update way on 9.3 amd64.
It took 14 patches and 1 second to do the job. Now,
I cannot see any difference. Only using fetch again,
it says No updates needed to update system to
9.3-RELEASE-p1.
How could I see that p1? I did not recompiled the
kernel, as it was not mentioned in
After updating to 9.2 release and upgrading ports,
I had to compile nvidia driver 319.32. Finally, have
graphics up. One file shows out of the blue, when-
ever I run startx, spite I remove it regurarly. The
size is 1024. Man for rand mentions it. I cannot see
what openssl has to do with X at the
I'd like to know if someone
has link to tutorial for managing
ipfw for torrent usage. Client
side, for start.
Best regards
Zoran
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
Hi all!
For a long time I see icmp 3.3 packets
in my log, coming from 65.59.245.131.
Cannot find what this address is in
fact. Every day, on both i386 and amd64.
I use ipfw and not a server at all. Comes
even if I just look for mail in console.
Does someone have similar item in log?
One more
Dear all!
I'd like to know if something
changed for pgp263i on amd64.
In ports, archs recommended are
i386 and alpha.
Has someone used gpg-idea port
(with idea and rsa) to circum-
vent pgp - gpg missmetch?
Best regards
Zoran
___
16 matches
Mail list logo
