--- Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patches you sent to implement this option didn't come through to the
mailing list, could you resend them please? :)
Seriously though, a lot of people looked at this problem when yarrow was
introduced, and no solution became immediately apparent.
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:17:35AM -0700, R. B. Riddick wrote:
--- Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
* I received a private communication yesterday about this matter. But the list
did not. I will cite (not litterally) a little bit out of that message: Since
you
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:29:44AM -0400, fwaggle wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:17:35AM -0700, R. B. Riddick wrote:
--- Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
* I received a private communication yesterday about this matter. But the
list
did not. I will cite
--- Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:17:35AM -0700, R. B. Riddick wrote:
These are valid if probably overly paranoid points. :)
Hmm... Oki Doke... But why use ssh, if u do not really care, if u connect to
the right host? Maybe the postmen know telecom-men? ;-)
--- fwaggle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have a question. perhaps i'm misunderstanding something with how SSH
works, but how would having a standard freebsd private key benefit
anyone? if you wanted to impersonate a newly installed freebsd machine,
then all you'd need is that freely-available
