Re[2]: freebsd-update and portsnap users still at risk of compromise

2016-08-10 Thread Mail Lists via freebsd-security
sorry but this is blabla and does not come even near to answering the real problem: It appears that freebsd and the US-government is more connected that some of us might like: Not publishing security issues concerning update mechanisms - we all can think WHY freebsd is not eager on this

Re[2]: freebsd-update and portsnap users still at risk of compromise

2016-08-10 Thread Mail Lists via freebsd-security
sorry but this is bullshit and does not come even near to answering the real problem: It appears that freebsd and the US-government is more connected that some of us might like: Not publishing security issues concerning update mechanisms - we all can think WHY freebsd is not eager on this

Re[4]: DefCon lecture BSD Kern Vulns

2017-08-07 Thread Mail Lists via freebsd-security
>Sunday, August 6, 2017 10:17 PM UTC from Justin Coffman via freebsd-security >: > >> >Monday, July 31, 2017 4:20 PM UTC from Dag-Erling Smørgrav >> < d...@des.no >: >> > >> >Big Lebowski < spankthes...@gmail.com > writes: >> >> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <

Re[2]: DefCon lecture BSD Kern Vulns

2017-08-06 Thread Mail Lists via freebsd-security
>Monday, July 31, 2017 4:20 PM UTC from Dag-Erling Smørgrav : > >Big Lebowski < spankthes...@gmail.com > writes: >> Dag-Erling Smørgrav < d...@des.no > writes: >> > There are decades of history here of which you are clearly unaware. >> > You may have the best of intentions, but