"CRL" == Chad R Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Telnet does. It would be really used if ssh did also.
CRL Really? I can't find an option that allows that. The closest I see
-s src_addr
Set the source IP address for the telnet connection to src_addr,
which
As I recall, Vivek Khera wrote:
"CRL" == Chad R Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Telnet does. It would be really used if ssh did also.
CRL Really? I can't find an option that allows that.
-s src_addr
Set the source IP address for the telnet connection to src_addr,
At 03:22 PM 11/14/00 +, G D McKee wrote:
Hi
How can I get a second FreeBSD server to masquerade through another one
hooked up to the internet using ppp without enabling nat in ppp.conf
file. Everything else from other PC's goes through squid or socks5 proxies.
Can I do anything with IPFW
At 03:35 PM 11/14/00 -0500, Evan S wrote:
I cvs'uppd my ports collection like the handbook and UPDATING file said
to, will that be enough so after I make installworld and merge master my
ports won't have to be recompiled?
Thanks,
Evan Sarmiento ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://sekt7.org/es
While I
Hello,
I updated my system an now I get a warning, when I use lsof:
..compiled for 4.1 .. this is 4.2
I know this happens only at system near ports.
How I get a list of ports which produce this warning so the users don't
report me this warning after the update?
Thanks.
--
Noch einen
At 03:26 PM 11/13/00 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:06:41PM -0800, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
wrote:
* I'm going to go ahead and bump -current's libc today in preparation of
* doing in -stable if it comes down to it. I know Garret has been waiting
* to make
* From: "David O'Brien" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Not sure if you saw this message. The more I think about it, I'm not
* sure bumping the shared libc version will accomplish anything other than
* require a compat4x distribution for 4.2-RELEASE. For the 4.0R upgrade
* kit you'd just have to
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:03:19PM -0600, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
Is the bump going to happen before 4.2 or not?
I don't know. I'd like to hear Satoshi's response to my last email on
the topic. The typical test [in this case] would be does a 4.0R shared
binary still run fine on a 4.2-R
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
It has been mentioned in the past many many times - and promptly forgotton
just as many times.
Forgive the harsh sounding critcism - just trying to get attention called to
this issue. It is not at all hard to reproduce - but it does not log
The problem was due to how I left several options
from my kernel. Adding them fixed the kernel compile
problem.
Thanks,
Hoang
--- David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 07:19:33PM -0800, Hoang Tran wrote:
I just added a NCR 53C810 and rebuild the kernel it's
I have noticed the same thing in 4.1-RELEASE. I dont have a clue why it
does that. When I killed moused and ran it again, everything worked fine.
I never saw the raw input from the mouse on the terminal. I know I'm not
much help, but perhaps someone else knows whats going on?
Caleb Land
This has been answered a view times over on this list when XFree-4.0.1
first came out.
The fix/workaround is to tweak your XF86Config file. For me, changing
Option "Protocol" from "Auto" to "Mousesystems" worked.
Ben Pfountz wrote:
I have noticed the same thing in 4.1-RELEASE. I dont have a
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 02:15:49PM -0800, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
Hmm. That's a good point. So you mean there is no way to build a
libc that works for 4.2 that will also work with a 4.0 kernel?
Yes.
(I don't think just changing the libc source on a 4.0 machine will
13 matches
Mail list logo
