On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 01:15:57AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Lanny Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010222 01:14] wrote:
Hello fellow FreeBSD'ers,
Would anyone happen to know the maximum amount of RAM that can be seen in a
system running FreeBSD.
It should be 4gigs on i386, I don't know
today i upgrading to 4.2-stable, every went smooth until i reboot the box
and i got
init : can't exec getty 'usr/libexec/getty' for port /dev/ttyv0
init : can't exec getty 'usr/libexec/getty' for port /dev/ttyv1
init : can't exec getty 'usr/libexec/getty' for port /dev/ttyv2
init : can't exec
Hello!
My system is 4.2-stable (built few days ago) on a Microstar MS 6321
dual celeron motherboard. The kernel has SMP support enabled.
Till yesterday I was using successfully a Diamond Fire GL 1000 Pro AGP
card with XFree 3.3.idontremember :)
Now I've got a new Matrox Millenium G450 32Mb
i have been chasing this on and off for days. it is dead reproducable.
do i have a broken compiler?
blew away entire source tree
blew away entire object tree
cvsupped a complete source and ports trees
*default host=cvsup7.freebsd.org
*default base=/usr
*default prefix=/usr
Now I've got a new Matrox Millenium G450 32Mb dual head AGP card, but
I've got also some weird problems...
Under XF 3, using XF86_SVGA as server, my monitor is totally blank (NEC
FE750). I'm sure this is not a
unsupported-resolution/frequency/scantimes problem, since I've
configured X
John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
I bet 99% of all users leave their crontab entries for the periodic
scripts unchanged.
I expect it's higher than that if you add more precision. First, most
users (more than 90%) never fool with software configuration *at all*,
though that's probably lower
I just do this every night. A 'crontab -e' as root suffices to install
the entries. I've never found the need to create a custom cvsup file,
the one in examples works just fine. The log level will list edits cvsup
makes.
42 3 * * * /usr/local/bin/cvsup -g -L 2 -h
i just cvsup my and did make world kernel...--mergemaster...all is
goodso just to tighten things up a bit ..i installed portsentry from the
ports collection...installed without a prob...the FreeBSD box is on a very
large internel network ( its our LAN resourse machine) it runs a bunch of
That's probably snmp iirc.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:23:19PM -0500, Brent wrote:
i just cvsup my and did make world kernel...--mergemaster...all is
goodso just to tighten things up a bit ..i installed portsentry from the
ports collection...installed without a prob...the FreeBSD box
Andrew Hesford [EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
I've been wondering about the limits of FreeBSD on an x86 system. Nobody
has been able to find a straight answer...
This question comes up on -questions at irregular intervals, and
answers can be found in the archives there.
First, what is the largest
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:23:19PM -0500, Brent wrote:
i just cvsup my and did make world kernel...--mergemaster...all is
goodso just to tighten things up a bit ..i installed portsentry from the
ports collection...installed without a prob...the FreeBSD box is on a very
large internel
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:00:50PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Don't do this; install the Xwrapper port instead -- the setuid bit was
removed from the XFree86 in favour of the Xwrapper port for a reason
(improved security).
So why not make the XFree86-4 port depend on Xwrapper so confusion
subscribe freebsd-stable
Zane Taylor.vcf
Sorry in advance for the tragic lack of detail in this message,
this is really just a first "heads-up: anyone else seeing this?"
message. I'll dig for details as time and interest permit...
A month or two ago, while running wine-2001.1.12 from ports, I
could run Lotus Notes almost completely
Say a web client has a few connections to a web server. One of those
connections is retriving an image (for example). When it's finished, it
will send a FIN to the server to close that connection. However, at the
same time, the web client wants to open a new connection to the same
I am working with VLANs and a BayStack 450-T without stability problems,
except when you configure NETGRAPH at the same time. The kernel crashes
during boot-up.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Tancsa
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001
Hi,
are vlans and the fxp driver ready for prime time ? I have a situation
where I would like to deploy a simple network which looks like
[network vlan #1]-[cat5500]-[network vlan #2]
|
|
|
On 2001-Feb-22 22:13:20 -0500, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are vlans and the fxp driver ready for prime time ?
I've been running a system with 6 VLANs on an fxp for about 6 months
now without problems. The system has currently been up nearly 3 weeks
(following a blackout) and had been
18 matches
Mail list logo