Re: sshd revealing too much stuff.

Graywane [EMAIL PROTECTED] probably said: Yes, it is security by obscurity and no, most people thinking about security on the net do not believe it is an effective technique to secure a site. You secure a site by: Security by obscurity is a bad thing to _rely_ on, but why make it any easier

Re: sshd revealing too much stuff.

On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 03:22:13AM -0500, Peter Radcliffe wrote: Graywane [EMAIL PROTECTED] probably said: Yes, it is security by obscurity and no, most people thinking about security on the net do not believe it is an effective technique to secure a site. You secure a site by: Security

Re: sshd revealing too much stuff.

Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] probably said: Making it easy for the _administrator_ to get information that is useful for administration is a good thing. This can be done without providing the same information to an attacker. Think about the audit for vulnerable versions of SSH using

4.3 BETA2/ports

hi all, I installed a machine from the beta cd (March 13), and now im trying to install some packages from the ports, so I copied a freshly cvsup'ed ports, but I guess I broke something, because now I get: cd /v0/ports/archivers/bzip2 make === Extracting for bzip2-1.0.1 Checksum OK

Strange problems with multiple jail's

I have an enviorement with more than 25 jail's There is always atleast one jail who can not connect to service like mail on the same ipadress. Telnet ipnumber(from the jail) 25 does not work in that jail, the main server cannot connect to any service on that jail. From the outside the jail is