sendmail traffic analysis

2001-05-11 Thread Arthur W. Neilson III
Recently I setup FreeBSD 4.3 on a HP Netserver (SMP) at my workplace and am stoked to be using FreeBSD for a production server in a predominantly Microsoft oriented distributed computing environment. It's a wonderful opportunity to show how well FreeBSD performs :^). This is the first time

Re: sendmail traffic analysis

2001-05-11 Thread Steve Mickeler
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Arthur W. Neilson III wrote: Recently I setup FreeBSD 4.3 on a HP Netserver (SMP) at my workplace and am stoked to be using FreeBSD for a production server in a predominantly Microsoft oriented distributed computing environment. It's a wonderful opportunity to show how

Re: 4.3-STABLE panics while mounting CD-R

2001-05-11 Thread Barney Wolff
Is it an audio cd? I've experienced the instant panic when mistakenly trying to mount such as a cd9660 fs. Of course it shouldn't panic, but the workaround is not to do that. Barney Wolff On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 01:24:46AM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote: Hi! 4.3-STABLE built 26 April 2001

Re: sendmail traffic analysis

2001-05-11 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article 20010511172756$[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: I'm not sure how to monitor sendmail with SNMP, and would be interested in hearing from others what tools they use to monitor SMTP traffic on their FreeBSD systems. Depends on what and how you want to monitor. For BIND, I wrote a little

Re: 4.3-STABLE panics while mounting CD-R

2001-05-11 Thread Thomas David Rivers
Is it an audio cd? I've experienced the instant panic when mistakenly trying to mount such as a cd9660 fs. Of course it shouldn't panic, but the workaround is not to do that. I get similar situations when mounting the 4.2-RELEASE 3rd CD for reading packages... This is with a

Re: sendmail traffic analysis

2001-05-11 Thread jack
Today Garrett Wollman wrote: I'm not sure how to monitor sendmail with SNMP, and would be interested in hearing from others what tools they use to monitor SMTP traffic on their FreeBSD systems. Depends on what and how you want to monitor. For BIND, I wrote a little script that stuffs

Re: Sound (PCM) in 4.3

2001-05-11 Thread Curtis King
On Fri, 11 May 2001 15:45:42 +0100 (BST) George Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 11 May 2001, Curtis King wrote: Some error messages (boot -v dmesg, pciconf -l etc) would help. Here is some more information as my SB Live doesn't work either. You seem to have the Plug Play OS

Re: sendmail traffic analysis

2001-05-11 Thread Mark Drayton
jack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Today Garrett Wollman wrote: I'm not sure how to monitor sendmail with SNMP, and would be interested in hearing from others what tools they use to monitor SMTP traffic on their FreeBSD systems. Depends on what and how you want to monitor. For BIND, I

Re: What gives?

2001-05-11 Thread Roelof Osinga
Rasputin wrote: ... -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1955761 May 10 00:30 gnome -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 636835 May 10 02:46 kde2 Freaky - those two both work for me. Sounds like your ports tree is shafted, because the ports work for others. Interesting suggestion. Never mind the

Re: What gives?

2001-05-11 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
The most common thing I find is leftovers, like a Makefile.inc or a work directory, do a make clean on them, I periodically do a make clean in /usr/ports. I know there is probably a more efficient way to do it, but I just let it go for a while. You could also do it before you install

fat32 slower than dogshit?

2001-05-11 Thread Lamont Granquist
Well, i think it is, i'm actually not too sure exactly how fast dogshit is in the first place. But in doing a simple untar on a fat32 partition using both 4-stable a couple days after release and a recently updated 4-stable as of yesterday (5/10) it goes about 20-30 times slower than an untar

RE: What gives?

2001-05-11 Thread Otter
If you really question your ports tree, just rm -rf /usr/ports/* and cvsup again. -Otter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David W. Chapman Jr. Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 6:06 PM To: Roelof Osinga; Rasputin Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: fat32 slower than dogshit?

2001-05-11 Thread Donn Miller
Lamont Granquist wrote: Well, i think it is, i'm actually not too sure exactly how fast dogshit is in the first place. But in doing a simple untar on a fat32 partition using both 4-stable a couple days after release and a recently updated 4-stable as of yesterday (5/10) it goes about 20-30