Thomas Nystrom wrote:
I have found one other person who has run the test sucessfully but I would
feel more comfortable if there were some more people that had run the
patch. I have also got a reply from a person in Finland that are going
to do exactly the same thing as you are.
When you're
James Pace wrote:
(No reply in -questions, so trying here. Thanks.)
Here is the end of the output from 'ipfw show':
04000 0 0 deny log ip from any to any
65535 91 8227 deny ip from any to any
Can anyone explain why the last rule is getting hit? I was under the
impression
On Thursday, 19 December 2002 at 21:33:50 -0600, Hari Bhaskaran wrote:
Hi,
I am having a problem using the bootvinum script. It seems to
consider only the first slice (PC-partition) of the root
spindle. I have put all vinum related files
here http://65.189.239.65/vinum_files/
I have two (1
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 02:26:34PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I must confess to being a bit baffled. You seem to be confused on a
number of points. Certainly there's never any reason to put more than
one Vinum volume on a physical disk.
Are you asking where the second hard-drive is
On Thursday, 19 December 2002 at 22:34:57 -0600, Hari Bhaskaran wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 02:26:34PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I must confess to being a bit baffled. You seem to be confused on a
number of points. Certainly there's never any reason to put more than
one Vinum
:I recently got my TREK Thumb drive working with -current. I was hoping to
:make similar changes to -STABLE to get it working. However, in -current,
:one of the quirks that had to be set IGNORE_RESIDUE. There does not
:seem to be any corresponding option in -STABLE.
:
:If there is, could one of
Andrew wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Asker wrote:
The modem can be configured to use PPPoE or PPTP protocol for making the
connection with my Internet Servise Provider.
Well if the modem does PPPoE itself (and preusmably NAT) then you need no
speical support from the OS. From its poitn of view
