5.0-STABLE ???

Hi :)) When will be created branch RELENG_5? After announce of the 5.1-RELEASE? Regards, Vitor de Matos Carvalho System Network Administrator - Softinfo Network FreeBSD - The Power To Serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the

Re: 5.0-STABLE ???

On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 15:03:26 -0200 Vitor de Matos Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi :)) When will be created branch RELENG_5? After announce of the 5.1-RELEASE? Therefore, the release engineering team will only create the 5-STABLE branch in the CVS repository after they have found a

Re: 5.0-STABLE ???

The only problem I see with this is that anybody following this particular RELEASE has to follow CURRENT, which is almost a contradiction of terms. Tom Veldhouse Therefore, the release engineering team will only create the 5-STABLE branch in the CVS repository after they have found a

Re: 5.0-STABLE ???

Thomas T. Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only problem I see with this is that anybody following this particular RELEASE has to follow CURRENT, which is almost a contradiction of terms. Not necessarily. There's a RELENG_5_0 branch. Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH

Re: 5.0-STABLE ???

A branch or a tag? I don't believe it was branched. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 12:33 PM Subject: Re: 5.0-STABLE ??? Thomas T. Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only problem I

Re: weird math in dump(8)

DUMP: 101.44% done, finished in 0:-1 Id' bet that's caused by activity on the FS between when dump starts (and makes it's estimate of how much to dump) and it finishes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message

Re: gcc -kthread

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 04:34:04PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: Thierry Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le Dim 19 jan 03 ? 14:42:02 +0100, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?crivait : Another question: are -pthread and -kthread interchangeable regarding to compilelink process? There exists a

Re: 5.0-STABLE ???

Thomas T. Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A branch or a tag? I don't believe it was branched. A branch. Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily

Re: ATA problems (still)

Hi all... This might be completely un-related... I have a box with 6 WD 80Gb BB series drives on a 3ware Escalade raid controller doing raid 5. Every now and then a drives seem to drop from the array for no reason. Its always a different drive, on a different port. Mabye the later WD drives have

Re: gcc -kthread

- Original Message - From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] -kthread is not supported. Shouldn't it be removed from the gcc man page then? (just curious: has it ever worked, and why was it removed?) -- Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for

Re: 5.0-STABLE ???

It doesn't look that way to me: Features are only added to the 4-STABLE development branch after a ``settling time'' in -CURRENT. FreeBSD 5.0 does not have the stabilizing influence of a -STABLE branch. (It is likely that the 5-STABLE development branch will be created sometime after 5.1-RELEASE

Re: 5.0-STABLE ???

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 08:37:42PM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: It doesn't look that way to me: Features are only added to the 4-STABLE development branch after a ``settling time'' in -CURRENT. FreeBSD 5.0 does not have the stabilizing influence of a -STABLE branch. (It is likely that

Problems with FreeBSD-5.0 and comms/ltmdm

Hello, I am running FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE on my laptop and just tried installing the comms/ltmdm port for my Lucent Winmodem. The port builds and installs without any problems, and when I reboot, the kernel module loads and detects the modem. However, if I try to initiate any kind of network