In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a P3 system running STABLE built on March 7. I installed a new
IBM DTLA disk drive and was distressed at its slowness, so I tried
turning on tagging to see if that would help. It seemed to, until...
3 AM when my periodic
I tried building a release ISO image today, but it failed because it
couldn't build the boot floppies.
Tail end of the build process (with an `ls' and `du' thown in).
Is this known?
Kent
linking BOOTMFS
textdata bss dec hex filename
2650861 209180 210260 3070301 2ed95d
Lukas Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyone has an idea what's going wrong here? (Apart from me doing bullsh*t
benchmarking :-) .)
Just out of curiosity, try again with prime stripe sizes (31, 61, 127,
257, 509) or at least odd ones (31, 63, 127, 255, 511).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL
Lukas Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm currently testing with prime stripe sizes, but it doesn't seem to
help. I additionally added options AHC_ALLOW_MEMIO to the kernel, and it
has raised write performance in the single-disk case (although I'm not
happy with that one either; I expected a
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Lukas Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm currently testing with prime stripe sizes, but it doesn't seem to
help. I additionally added options AHC_ALLOW_MEMIO to the kernel, and it
has raised write performance in the single-disk case (although
Lukas Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Does the data sheet for your disk indicate that it can in fact write
much faster than that?
Well, the HP/Compaq webpages are full of marketing speech wrt that, but
since these disks are U320 disks, they
On Sunday, 30 March 2003 at 14:08:24 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
Lukas Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyone has an idea what's going wrong here? (Apart from me doing bullsh*t
benchmarking :-) .)
Just out of curiosity, try again with prime stripe sizes (31, 61, 127,
257, 509) or at
On Sunday, 30 March 2003 at 16:30:17 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
Anti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
try benchmarking ccd as well to see how it compares? and try some big stripe
sizes (4093, 8191, 12281)?
I believe Greg showed in his USENIX paper on Vinum that large stripe
sizes aren't
On Sunday, 30 March 2003 at 18:10:07 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
Lukas Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm currently testing with prime stripe sizes, but it doesn't seem to
help. I additionally added options AHC_ALLOW_MEMIO to the kernel, and it
has raised write performance in the
