ACPI problem in HP omnibook 6000 laptop

I cvsup-ed 5-stable code today and build world and kernel. Before today's code only reboot doesn't work, now it can't boot well, the laptop will hang after kernel loaded. That maybe the laptop's problem, because in Windows XP the laptop will also hang often. But the laptop works very well in

preemption stable under 5.3?

Hi, Is the preemption stable under 5.3 release? Can i savely enable it under 5.3? Latest i heard that in combination with the ule scheduler it didnt work well and wasnt stable. Bye, Mipam. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: preemption stable under 5.3?

Am Montag, 8. November 2004 11:56 schrieb Mipam: Hi, Is the preemption stable under 5.3 release? Can i savely enable it under 5.3? Latest i heard that in combination with the ule scheduler it didnt work well and wasnt stable. ULE was disabled and can't be compiled with 5.3, PREEMPTION and

Re: preemption stable under 5.3?

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Emanuel Strobl wrote: Am Montag, 8. November 2004 11:56 schrieb Mipam: Hi, Is the preemption stable under 5.3 release? Can i savely enable it under 5.3? Latest i heard that in combination with the ule scheduler it didnt work well and wasnt stable. ULE was

Re: why was /etc/defaults/make.conf not updated

Hi, sorry, i have forgotten to say, the informations over the change of the Variables have i found in /usr/ports/UPDATING. Sorry On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:37:14 +0100, Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, ich have found an entry in /usr/local/ports/UPDATING, that the Variable

READ_DMA interrupt error after upgrading to 5.3 STABLE

Hello, On my laptop i am running 5.2.1-RELEASE-p11. A few weeks ago i upgraded it to 5.3 BETA7. After building world i went to single user mode, to complete the upgrade. After a few seconds running in single user mode, i got errors about READ_DMA and my laptop was completly frozen. At that time

Upgrade from 5.3 RC1 to 5.3

Hi! I was making some tests with 5.3 RC1 and was working fine, so I go ahead and make a lot of customization and configuration, so the machine is ready to do its work. But now I want to cvsup the sources of 5.3 and build a new kernel and userland. In spite of the small differences between the

Re: SCB - timed out on FreeBSD 4.10-p2

On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 04:16:51PM -0800, Dave Hayes wrote: /kernel: da0 at ahd0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 /kernel: da0: SEAGATE ST336607LW 0007 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device /kernel: da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled /kernel: da0: 35003MB

Odd error at end of make installworld

I think there is a small issue with the Makefile, although I don't see exactly what. But I'm no great shakes on Makefiles. At the very end of the installworld, after completely the makewhatis and /etc stuff, I got the message that I should not be doing a make world: WARNING: make world will

Re: READ_DMA interrupt error after upgrading to 5.3 STABLE

On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 03:54:45PM +0100, Richard Arends wrote: Hello, ad0: WARNING - READ_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA = 351 Okay, replaying to my own message, but i found a workaround. If i set at bootime hw.ata.ata_dma to 0, i can boot the 5.3 STABLE kernel and even start

Jail and df problem

Hi, I'm running several jails on this box and df doesnt seem to report the filesystems that are mounted within the jail. When using : fbsd5# sysctl security.jail.getfsstatroot_only=1 i see : 22:37|[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/md0s1a

Re: SCB - timed out on FreeBSD 4.10-p2

Dave Hayes wrote: /kernel: da0: SEAGATE ST336607LW 0007 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device /kernel: da1: SEAGATE ST373307LW 0006 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device We use a metric boatload of these machines and disks

calcru: negative runtime of -SOMENUM usec for pid errors.

I have an IBM aptiva, K6/450 and 5.3 gives me continuous calcru messages. I understand is it probably hardware related, but I could not replicate the messages using 4.10. I pulled out all the hardware that I could to no avail. So is it just the fact that 4.10 is not showing the messages vs.

Spam on Stable

Hi all, I just recently joined this list and I am getting more spam than -stable posts. Is this normal these days? I was on -current and it had its share of spam, but it wasn't too bad. Since I am tracking RELENG_5, I jumped lists to -stable Thanks, Rob

Filesystem buffer size

I have a server thats sole purpose for existence is serving a fixed group of files from a dedicated filesystem. There is a directory tree with about 50K files that is requested in a random order. I have been trying find the correct sysctl variable to dedicate more RAM to the filesystem buffer

Re: preemption stable under 5.3?

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Mipam wrote: Thanks for your reply, okay, then i'd like to enable preemption. I noticed it's not in the GENERIC kernel config file. So: options PREEMPTION would suffice to enable it i guess? Any experience with preemption. noticable changes? So the problem: PREEMPTION

NDIS Panic with 5.3-RELEASE (with trace)

Hi, I forgot I should be sending this to stable instead of current :) Thanks for any help, Mike - Forwarded message from Mike Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Mike Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I upgraded to 5.3-RELEASE (contrats!) and everything seems to be

Re: Upgrade from 5.3 RC1 to 5.3

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Mauricio Brunstein wrote: I was making some tests with 5.3 RC1 and was working fine, so I go ahead and make a lot of customization and configuration, so the machine is ready to do its work. But now I want to cvsup the sources of 5.3 and build a new kernel and userland. In

PXE installing 5.3-RELEASE on a Soekris 4801 fails

Hello! Today my Soekris 4801 box arrived. I tried to install 5.3-RELEASE following this document: http://www.rfc1149.net/freebsd-net4801.html.en While it works precisely as described with a 5.2-RELEASE or 5.2.1-RELEASE CD-ROM, it fails with 5.3-RELEASE: [... Kernel loading and starting

Re: 5.3R crash while building world

Hi, I followed the example of mr. Holm and produced backtraces of the dumps. Hopefully someone in the know finds them useful. I'm sorry I don't have a debug kernel, but the system in its current state isn't capable of compiling one. regards, Derkjan 0 #0 0xc060bbb6 in doadump () #1 0xc060c189

RE: 5.3R crash while building world

All, I installed 5.3R on one of my systems, but as soon as I attempt to compile something (make buildworld), after 10 seconds or so gcc bombs with an internal compiler error, and/or the machine crashes with a 'fatal trap 12' error. This seems to happen at random places. ... Had *the same*

Re: PCMCIA modem heating

Zoran Kolic said: Hi all! Don't wonna make stupid quiestions, but this is something I have to know to make reclamation if neces- sary. After 5-10 minutes of inter- net connection, when detached, my pccard modem is hot as fur- nace. I can barely take it in my hand. Is it normal beha-

Re: preemption stable under 5.3?

Robert Watson wrote: On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Mipam wrote: Thanks for your reply, okay, then i'd like to enable preemption. I noticed it's not in the GENERIC kernel config file. So: options PREEMPTION would suffice to enable it i guess? Any experience with preemption. noticable changes? So the

Re: Filesystem buffer size

On Nov 8, 2004, at 1:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a server thats sole purpose for existence is serving a fixed group of files from a dedicated filesystem. There is a directory tree with about 50K files that is requested in a random order. I have been trying find the correct sysctl

pccard modem and ethernet don't work together

Hello, I posted the same text as below to current@ on 20 Oct, but got no answer. Is there somebody here who knows more about this or can tell me where to look further? I got a 'me too' message from somebody who googled my previous question, so there are more people with this problem. Ronald.

Re: RE: Upgrade from 5.3 RC1 to 5.3

Ok. I'm building world now. I never compiled anything in this source tree, From de RC1 sources, I made cvsup with the RELENG_5_3 tag, and I'm building the world and kernel with the following make.conf: # Begin of make.conf # -- use.perl generated deltas -- # # Created: Sat Nov 6 04:24:01 2004 #

Re: calcru: negative runtime of -SOMENUM usec for pid errors.

On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 08:52:30AM -0800, Dean Patterson wrote: I have an IBM aptiva, K6/450 and 5.3 gives me continuous calcru messages. I understand is it probably hardware related, but I could not replicate the messages using 4.10. I pulled out all the hardware that I could to no avail.

Re: calcru: negative runtime of -SOMENUM usec for pid errors.

On Tuesday, 9. November 2004 00:49, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 08:52:30AM -0800, Dean Patterson wrote: I have an IBM aptiva, K6/450 and 5.3 gives me continuous calcru messages. The kern.timecounter sysctl hierarchy is definitely there on 5.3. What is

Re: preemption stable under 5.3?

For the benefit of those that are not aware. Can someone please explain what is meant by 'kernel preemption' and the benefits of it. Thanks - aW 0n Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:29:23PM +, Robert Watson wrote: On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Mipam wrote: Thanks

Re: preemption stable under 5.3?

if you have a thread A of high priority and a thread B of low priority then if A is stopped (blocked for some reason) and B is running, then preemption controls or describes what happens when A is unblocked.. With no preemption, A is ubblocked and becomes teh highes priority thread to run

Termcap Makefile Doesn't Honor DESTDIR

The makefile in /usr/src/share/termcap doesn't honor DESTDIR. Should it? Later, Jason C. Wells ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

FAST_IPSEC INET6: kernel compiles, but is it dangerous?

Hi, When I do a mailinglist search and a google on FAST_IPSEC and INET6 with 5.3, I get quite some results that say: the kernel compilation will fail, because FAST_IPSEC requires exclusion of INET6. I'm running 5.3-STABLE, and I have compiled a kernel with FAST_IPSEC and INET6; this compiles fine,

NVIDIA driver crashing the system

I am trying to use the nvidia driver from the ports on FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE but every time i startup X the system crash My system: Laptop: Dell latitud D800 video card: GeForce FX Go5200 I attached a console to the laptop and i got this: --- NVRM: detected agp.ko, aborting NVIDIA AGP setup!