Re: VIA Rhine II network card

On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:27, Zoltan Frombach wrote: > It could be a full-duplex/half duplex mismatch issue. Try not to use > auto-negotiation. You can set your interface to "fixed" full-duplex (or > half-duplex) in /etc/rc.conf You must match the setting with the other > side of your connection (eg.

Re: VIA Rhine II network card

It could be a full-duplex/half duplex mismatch issue. Try not to use auto-negotiation. You can set your interface to "fixed" full-duplex (or half-duplex) in /etc/rc.conf You must match the setting with the other side of your connection (eg. your switch). Zoltan __

Re: Named 9.3.0 && weird error at bootup

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: Hello, Recently I upgraded from 5.2.1-release to 5.3-release. When I try to start named I get a weird error: Nov 15 19:23:12 freebsd named[1152]: starting BIND 9.3.0 -4 -u bind -t /var/named/etc/namedb/ -c /etc/named.conf I'm assuming from these command l

Re: Portupgrade question

On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:22:07PM +0100, Sutto Zoltan wrote: > Hi! > > > Running portsdb -U I get messages like these > php4-gd-4.3.9:"/a/ports/lang/php5" non-existent -- dependency list > incomplete > php4-gd-4.3.9:"/a/ports/lang/php5" non-existent -- dependency list > incomplete >

VIA Rhine II network card

I think that something is wrong with VIA Rhine II network device driver. I run FreeBSD 5.3. Behaviour of network seems to be random: one time everything is OK but a second later I can't connect to host in my local network. But when I connect to other host, not in my network and then try to connect

Re: gvinum again?

Hi, Am Montag, 15. November 2004 19:41 schrieb Paul Mather: > On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 19:33 +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > > The extension of filesystems on concat plexes works (simply) as > > advertised... :-) At least *I* had no problems so far. > > That's encouraging to hear! Can you sh

Re: gvinum again?

On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 07:33:36PM +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > Am Montag, 15. November 2004 18:25 schrieb Paul Mather: > > [...] > > I don't know if growfs is 100% robust enough yet to provide the other > > important ingredient to a true LVM storage management system a la the > > logica

Re: Can't compile 5.3-STABLE from 5.3-RC2

Am Montag, den 15.11.2004, 15:05 +0100 schrieb Alex de Kruijff: Hi Alex & List, well, what a fiaksko -- on my Part :-( I just had a look at my /etc/make.conf again -- and found a line "CXXFLAGS= -O -pipe" at the very end. I removed the CXXFLAGS-Line that added the memoize-stuff when the 5.2.1 ->

Re: net80211+atheros changes (updated)

On 15.11.2004 09:40:48 +, Sam Leffler wrote: [...] > > I'm able to use WEP which was broken before. I'll try TKIP and CCMP > > crypto support. > > > > Any chance of getting these changes committed? > > No. I have stated previously that I will not commit any of these changes to > CVS until a

Named 9.3.0 && weird error at bootup

Hello, Recently I upgraded from 5.2.1-release to 5.3-release. When I try to start named I get a weird error: Nov 15 19:23:12 freebsd named[1152]: starting BIND 9.3.0 -4 -u bind -t /var/named/etc/namedb/ -c /etc/named.conf Nov 15 19:23:12 freebsd named[1152]: command channel listening on 0.

Re: gvinum again?

On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 19:33 +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > Hi, > > Am Montag, 15. November 2004 18:25 schrieb Paul Mather: > > [...] > > I don't know if growfs is 100% robust enough yet to provide the other > > important ingredient to a true LVM storage management system a la the > > logi

Re: gvinum again?

Hi, Am Montag, 15. November 2004 18:25 schrieb Paul Mather: > [...] > I don't know if growfs is 100% robust enough yet to provide the other > important ingredient to a true LVM storage management system a la the > logical volume manager on AIX or AdvFS on Tru64, say. Yes, it is. I use (g)vinum pr

Re: net80211+atheros changes (updated)

On Monday 15 November 2004 08:53 am, Michael Lyngbøl wrote: > On 11.11.2004 07:51:15 +, John Hay wrote: > > > Let's try this again: > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sam/net80211+ath-20041015.tgz > > > > > > This applys cleanly to -current as of last night, builds, and boots. > > > Beware

Re: gvinum again?

On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 02:31 -0500, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 01:26:54 -0500, Paul Mather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Your observation is correct: it doesn't (yet) load balance across plexes > > of mirrored volumes; geom_mirror (gmirror) does, though (and offers > > variou

Re: net80211+atheros changes (updated)

On 11.11.2004 07:51:15 +, John Hay wrote: > > > > Let's try this again: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sam/net80211+ath-20041015.tgz > > > > This applys cleanly to -current as of last night, builds, and boots. > > Beware of applying this over old patches as patch -N doesn't always seem

Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 87, Issue 1

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:41:17 -0700, firewall du <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When disabling and enabling a nic (bfe0) my system warm boots itself > (sometimes) [cut of 1527 useless lines] Before check your problem try HOWTO-write-a-mail. -- Cris, member of G.U.F.I Italian FreeBSD User Group ht

Re: GENERIC error:

On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 09:25:17AM -0500, Andrew Lewis wrote: > I have a few 4x-stable boxes I'm trying to bring up to date but I keep > getting the same error in the same place. I can't dig anything similar > up searching around. > > This is a recent stable cvsup and I'm using: > > rm -rf /us

Portupgrade question

Hi! Running portsdb -U I get messages like these php4-gd-4.3.9:"/a/ports/lang/php5" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete php4-gd-4.3.9:"/a/ports/lang/php5" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete php4-ming-4.3.9:"/a/ports/lang/php5" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete

Portupgrade question

Hi! Running portsdb -U I get messages like these php4-gd-4.3.9:"/a/ports/lang/php5" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete php4-gd-4.3.9:"/a/ports/lang/php5" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete php4-ming-4.3.9:"/a/ports/lang/php5" non-existent -- dependency list incompl

GENERIC error:

I have a few 4x-stable boxes I'm trying to bring up to date but I keep getting the same error in the same place. I can't dig anything similar up searching around. This is a recent stable cvsup and I'm using: rm -rf /usr/obj/usr && make clean && make update && make buildword && make buildkernel

Re: Can't compile 5.3-STABLE from 5.3-RC2

On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 12:49:08AM +0100, Alex de Kruijff wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 08:31:36PM +0100, Ralf Folkerts wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I wanted to Update my System that runs FreeBSD 5.3-RC2 to the "final" > > 5.3-Level. > > > > However, compile reproducible stops in libstdc++, claiming

Problem with Intel SCRU42X Raid controller.

Hi Folks, I'm seeing the problem described in the following thread with 5.3-STABLE and an Intel SCRU42X RAID controller: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-January/019754.html Basically, operations such as "find /" sometimes block and the driver emits a "amrd0: bad slot x co

100.chksetuid in /etc/periodic/security resets the mashine

Hello, kolleages! I have a problem. When I (or system) start the script 100.chksetuid in /etc/periodic/security my machine resets. The machine: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (3056.82-MHz 686-class CPU) System version: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #0: M

Re: panic: APIC: Previous IPI is stuck

On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 04:49:56PM +1100, Andy Farkas wrote: > [freebsd.org is rejecting my email (cant find hostname) > so please feel free to copy this to the list] So quoted in full. > On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Adrian Wontroba wrote: > ... > > The practice is that it it has now crashed three times

[no subject]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Bcc:gruand Subject: Re: 100.chksetuid in /etc/periodic/security resets the mashine Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hello, kolleages! I have a problem. When I (or system) start the script 100.chksetuid in /etc/periodic/security my machine resets. The machine