On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 09:29:48AM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:47:04 -0800
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
Hi,
This happens when makeing world with -DNOCLEAN, sources cvsup'ed 5
minutes ago. I'm going to try a clean build
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:42:12AM +0700, zen wrote:
Hi freebsd-stable;
i just cvsup my box today my current version are 5.3 RELEASE,
and cvsup it with releng_5. and the make buildworld just stop with
these error messages :
libmagic/../../contrib/file/apprentice.c
On March 22, 2005 11:50 pm, Constant, Benjamin wrote:
I think this may work if I use two cvsup files (one for the src-all
and the other one for the ports) using a different date inside.
You should always use separate supfiles for the source and
ports trees.
Why? Because the ports
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Vinod Kashyap wrote:
If any kernel module has the following, or a similar line in it:
-
char x[100] = {0};
-
I think you mean:
-
auto char x[100] = {0};
-
or after fixing some style bugs:
-
char x[100] = { 0 };
-
building of the GENERIC kernel
Hello Rene,
On Thursday 24 March 2005 15:51, you wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:15:58PM +0800, Mars Trading wrote:
Hello,
I heard that tty usb devices would be renamed to /dev/cuaU#
replacing /dev/ucom#. Is this going to happen in 5.4-RELEASE?
I
This is true for 6.0 (CURRENT),
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:07:31 +0200
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 09:29:48AM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:47:04 -0800
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
Hi,
This happens when makeing
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Vinod Kashyap wrote:
If any kernel module has the following, or a similar line in it:
-
char x[100] = {0};
-
building of the GENERIC kernel on FreeBSD 5 -STABLE for amd64
as of 03/19/05, fails with the following message at the
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:17:34AM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:07:31 +0200
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 09:29:48AM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:47:04 -0800
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I have FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE installed. Since I've installed a new 115200
Kbit/s modem and established ppp connection using kernel ppp, I
started recieving following messages:
sio0: 296 more interrupt-level buffer overflows (total 57038)
This message repeats almost every minute
At 2005-03-24 08:31:14+, Bruce Evans writes:
what is gcc to do when -fno-builtin tells it to turn off its
builtins and -ffreestanding tells it that the relevant interfaces
might not exist in the library?
Plainly, GCC should generate code which fills the array with zeroes.
It's not obliged
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:43:58 -0700
Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does this machine behave with a stock 6.0-CURRENT kernel? Could
It behaves in the same way.
you see if the 6.0-CURRENT-SNAP002 snapshot boots on it?
Yes, hang on for about an hour or two. :-)
No, it also hangs (the
FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Mar 17 16:41:58 EET 2005
${fwcmd} add 400 deny log ip from any to any not antispoof in
rl2: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet 192.168.0.97 netmask 0xffe0 broadcast 192.168.0.127
/var/log/security:
ipfw: 400 Deny ICMP:8.0
I have run this upgrade on the 2 machines i have here, with 2 different errors
but both failing to install.
=
Main Production Machine error:
libtool: compile: unable to infer tagged configuration
libtool: compile: specify a tag with `--tag'
*** Error code 1
Søren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
New version available for testing:
[...]
Intel ICH6R and Promise S150SX4 still working like a charm (except for
missing RAID5 support). Please commit :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:39:23PM +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:49:15PM +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:21:04PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 21:51 +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
I was trying to get a Ralink RT2500 Wireless
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Søren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
New version available for testing:
[...]
Intel ICH6R and Promise S150SX4 still working like a charm (except for
missing RAID5 support). Please commit :)
Good! If you look carefull you can see that RAID5 support has stepped
Søren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good! If you look carefull you can see that RAID5 support has stepped
closer, composite ATA commands are now in there making RAID5 possible.
I noticed that in your email. Maybe I'll sit down on a rainy day and
finish the software RAID5 support, and you
Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wondered if it might be because of something like -O2 (don't do that)
Peter, stop that. The kernel builds and runs fine with -O2, and has
for a long time.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 05:45:16PM -0300, Marcus Grando wrote:
+ Hi,
+
+ I try run dumpon on swap partition in gmirror disk. But that's not
+ possible. This error occurs:
+
+ # dumpon -v /dev/mirror/datas1b
+ dumpon: ioctl(DIOCSKERNELDUMP): Operation not supported
+
+ It's possible to use
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Tom wrote:
So after my previous problem with 5.3 not being able to do a buildworld,
I decided that maybe an upgrade was in order.
I downloaded the 5.4 ISO and installed from it.
I tried to do a buildworld, same problem as the 5.3 install.
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Mars Trading wrote:
I heard that tty usb devices would be renamed to /dev/cuaU#
replacing /dev/ucom#. Is this going to happen in 5.4-RELEASE? I
hope so; I'm still having problems using uplcom+ucom. Maybe the
renaming thing would help?
No, this renaming is in -CURRENT
This version makes the pessimizations and potential bugs clear:
- clearing 100 bytes on every entry to the function is
wasteful. C90's
auto initializers hide pessimizations like this. They should be
used very rarely, especially in kernels. But they are
often misused,
even in
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wondered if it might be because of something like -O2 (don't do that)
Peter, stop that. The kernel builds and runs fine with -O2, and has
for a long time.
DES
No it doesn't. See the gymnastics that Bill Paul had to do recently
Scott Long writes:
No it doesn't. See the gymnastics that Bill Paul had to do recently in
the iee80211 code to get around the insane inlining that gcc does with
-O2. I'm not saying that gcc produces incorrect code, but I am saying
that there is very strong evidence that it produces code that is
Matthias Buelow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm trying the restore a dump, which I have encrypted with the bdes(1)
utility, from a mounted 5.3-RELEASE fixit CD (cd2 i386).
I have encrypted the dump with the same bdes that is on that CD.
I use a pipeline that looks something like
On Thu, 2005-Mar-24 12:03:19 -0800, Vinod Kashyap wrote:
[ char x[100] = { 0 }; ]
A statement like this (auto and not static)
I'd point out that this is the first time that you've mentioned that
the variable is auto. Leaving out critical information will not
encourage people to help you.
is
oops.. that one misfired. sorry. (I was testing the weird
nail program and apparently it invoked a reply on some
random message..)
mkb.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Scott Long writes:
No it doesn't. See the gymnastics that Bill Paul had to do recently in
the iee80211 code to get around the insane inlining that gcc does with
-O2. I'm not saying that gcc produces incorrect code, but I am saying
that there is very strong evidence that
I just cvsupped to the latest RELENG_5 (as of yesterday) and built and
installed the world and a new kernel. When I boot the new kernel, I get
an error ffs_mountroot: can't find rootvp. At the mountroot prompt,
whatever I type (even '?') causes a crash and reboot. I can still boot
my old
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Nick Barnes wrote:
At 2005-03-24 08:31:14+, Bruce Evans writes:
what is gcc to do when -fno-builtin tells it to turn off its
builtins and -ffreestanding tells it that the relevant interfaces
might not exist in the library?
Plainly, GCC should generate code which fills the
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Thu, 2005-Mar-24 12:03:19 -0800, Vinod Kashyap wrote:
[ char x[100] = { 0 }; ]
A statement like this (auto and not static)
I'd point out that this is the first time that you've mentioned that
the variable is auto. Leaving out critical information will
-Original Message-
From: Peter Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 2:46 PM
To: Vinod Kashyap
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: undefined reference to `memset'
On Thu, 2005-Mar-24 12:03:19 -0800, Vinod Kashyap wrote:
[
Vinod,
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 19:01 -0800, Vinod Kashyap wrote:
Just like the problem is not seen when I build only the module, it's
not seen if I simply write a foo.c (with the example code) and compile it.
That's the reason I posted the patch to /sys/dev/twa/twa.c, which would
cause the
-Original Message-
From: Sean McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:15 PM
To: Vinod Kashyap
Cc: Peter Jeremy; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: undefined reference to `memset'
Vinod,
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 19:01 -0800,
Hello,
This makes since about the baud rate not working. I have my
configuration and hint file just like yours. And I get the same results.
If you plug the card into a windows machine, will it work then? If so then
what is the windows driver setting up differently? Could there be a patch
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 19:51 -0800, Vinod Kashyap wrote:
I did look at your posting Sean, thanks. But did you see the
undefined reference to `memset' linker error when you built it?
It's obvious that a reference to memset is being generated by
the initialization of an array of 100 bytes to 0.
36 matches
Mail list logo
