Re: stack backtrace

2005-06-02 Thread Derek Kuliński
Hello Sven, Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 2:29:36 PM, you wrote: Apparently this is still somewhat of a mystery, but you are not the first person to witness this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-April/013679.html

Re: stack backtrace

2005-06-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 11:29:56AM -0700, Derek Kuli?ski wrote: Hello, Today I noticed following message in the log: KDB: stack backtrace: kdb_backtrace(c07163b8,2,c661994c,0,22) at kdb_backtrace+0x2e getdirtybuf(d109ebac,0,1,c661994c,1) at getdirtybuf+0x2b

Re[3]: ATA DMA timeouts

2005-06-02 Thread Tony Byrne
Martin, TB We're now at 2 hours uptime and there is no sign of the ATA TB timeouts. With the newer kernels the first timeout would appear TB within 5 to 10 minutes of rebooting. I can't see any changes to TB the ATA code in the interim so I'm curious as to what could have TB caused this issue.

Re: kadmin (heimdal port) ignores the ldap backend

2005-06-02 Thread fandino
Boris Samorodov wrote: Do you build FreeBSD with Kerberos support? There may be system Yes, it was builded with Kerberos(0.6.3) and the heimdal port Aha, thus you install system libraries to /usr/lib etc... (0.6.3) was also installed in order to get ldap support for heimdal ...and

filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread Maxi Combina
Hello, I am running freebsd 5.4, and every time I reboot, I get a mesasge when the kernel is mounting the filesystems. It says that the fs were not properly unmounted, and must chek them. Them main concern is with my root partition. I also have en ext3 partition (which I mount as ext2), and the

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread Steven Hartland
Are you 100% sure u didn't use shutdown -p as I've seen this happen and its apparently due to IDE disks lying about when they have flushed all data to disk. Steve - Original Message - From: Maxi Combina [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I am running freebsd 5.4, and every time I reboot, I

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread Matthias Buelow
Maxi Combina wrote: Hello, I am running freebsd 5.4, and every time I reboot, I get a mesasge when the kernel is mounting the filesystems. It says that the fs were not properly unmounted, and must chek them. Them main concern is with my root partition. I also have en ext3 partition (which I

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread Ronald Klop
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:09:08 +0200, Maxi Combina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am running freebsd 5.4, and every time I reboot, I get a mesasge when the kernel is mounting the filesystems. It says that the fs were not properly unmounted, and must chek them. Them main concern is with my

Re: kadmin (heimdal port) ignores the ldap backend

2005-06-02 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:04:56 +0200 fandino wrote: Boris Samorodov wrote: Do you build FreeBSD with Kerberos support? There may be system Yes, it was builded with Kerberos(0.6.3) and the heimdal port Aha, thus you install system libraries to /usr/lib etc... (0.6.3) was also installed

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread Yuval Levy
Matthias Buelow wrote: Maxi Combina wrote: Hello, I am running freebsd 5.4, and every time I reboot, I get a mesasge when the kernel is mounting the filesystems. It says that the fs were not properly unmounted, and must chek them. Them main concern is with my root partition. I also have en

Re: stack backtrace

2005-06-02 Thread Derek Kuliński
Hello Kris, Thursday, June 2, 2005, 12:37:41 AM, you wrote: It looks like debugging code (it's been removed in -current). Jeff: in 1.141 of ffs_softdep.c you added a call to backtrace() if bp-b_vp == NULL..you removed it in current in 1.166, but some people are seeing it trigger on 5.x

Re: DELL PowerEdge 2850 and FreeBSD 5.4

2005-06-02 Thread David Barnett
Gary, I'm fighting the same battle on two new 2850's and two 1850's; Interrupt storm detected on irq18:uhci2; throttling interrupt source. These machines have 2GB of ram and I using the i386 5.4Rel. version. This happens right after the reboot at the end of an install from CD. I've chosen to

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread Dick Davies
* Yuval Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [0647 15:47]: Is it possible to fix this issue? from the description it seems to me that the issue got worse since freebsd 5.3 (assuming Maxi's root partition is ufs2). If it's a pain to remeber, maybe try sticking something in rc.shutdown? -- 'Ugh, it's

RE: DELL PowerEdge 2850 and FreeBSD 5.4

2005-06-02 Thread Danny Cooper
I have disabled usb via rc.conf usbd_enable=NO But in the new custom kernel I have commented out all of the usb devices and firewire. However the machine managed to stay up for 22 hours without any problems. But I decided to put it underload, through multiple make de/install's of mysql,

Re: stack backtrace

2005-06-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:11:23AM -0700, Derek Kuli?ski wrote: Hello Kris, Thursday, June 2, 2005, 12:37:41 AM, you wrote: It looks like debugging code (it's been removed in -current). Jeff: in 1.141 of ffs_softdep.c you added a call to backtrace() if bp-b_vp == NULL..you

Re: wi0 is always status: no carrier

2005-06-02 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 11:57 pm, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kirk Strauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Wednesday 01 June 2005 10:07 am, John Baldwin wrote: : I see. It's because your PIR lists 10 as the only IRQ that it does : this. You can

repeatable crash with 5.4-RELEASE and PAE

2005-06-02 Thread Brendan White
We're having crash under load problems using freebsd 5.4-release (i386) and PAE kernel. Machine: Dual Xeon 3.6 Dell Poweredge 2850 8 gigs of ram 16 gigs of swap amr raid The machine will reliably crash under load within an hour or so. under load involves large network transfers being

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread yuval levy
--- Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Yuval Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [0647 15:47]: Is it possible to fix this issue? from the description it seems to me that the issue got worse since freebsd 5.3 (assuming Maxi's root partition is ufs2). If it's a pain to remeber, maybe try

RE: repeatable crash with 5.4-RELEASE and PAE

2005-06-02 Thread Danny Cooper
Hi Brendan, I have 2 Dual Xeon 3.6 Dell Poweredge 2850 4 gigs of ram 8 gigs of swap amr raid They can crash at any moment not just underload, I persisted for 10 days to get a stable system with and without PAE but to no avail with 4GB of RAM. I did try and turn off ACPI, HTT which made the

Re: repeatable crash with 5.4-RELEASE and PAE

2005-06-02 Thread Claus Guttesen
How are you disabling USB? It seems that has worked for you. By adding the line below to /etc/rc.conf: usbd_enable=NO and disable any usb-related in your kernel, the sections; # USB support ... # USB Ethernet, requires mii ... regards Claus ___

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread J. T. Farmer
yuval levy wrote: --- Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Yuval Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [0647 15:47]: Is it possible to fix this issue? from the description it seems to me that the issue got worse since freebsd 5.3 (assuming Maxi's root partition is ufs2).

Re: DELL PowerEdge 2850 and FreeBSD 5.4

2005-06-02 Thread David Barnett
Removing the DRAC cards let me log in. Now I can deal with the usb interrupt stuff. db Danny Cooper wrote: I have disabled usb via rc.conf usbd_enable=NO But in the new custom kernel I have commented out all of the usb devices and firewire. However the machine managed to stay up for 22

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread yuval levy
--- J. T. Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yuval levy wrote: --- Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Yuval Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [0647 15:47]: Is it possible to fix this issue? from the description it seems to me that the issue got worse since freebsd 5.3

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread Charles Swiger
On Jun 2, 2005, at 4:56 PM, yuval levy wrote: If it's a pain to remeber, maybe try sticking something in rc.shutdown? Thank you for trying to help, but I do not find this reply helpful. That's a quick and dirty fix, not a solution. [ ...car analogy snipped... ] Quick and dirty fixes are ok

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread Matthias Buelow
yuval levy wrote: Anyway, I am just trying to stirr some talk and get some attention to an issue which I find important. Maybe somebody with the appropriate skills will read this and fix the issue. Noone complains that people stir things up every now and then.. at least then the developers

Re: stack backtrace

2005-06-02 Thread Derek Kuliński
Hello Kris, Thursday, June 2, 2005, 11:06:54 AM, you wrote: in 1.141 of ffs_softdep.c you added a call to backtrace() if bp-b_vp == NULL..you removed it in current in 1.166, but some people are seeing it trigger on 5.x So it's harmless? I don't know, but I presume the debugging code was

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread Dick Davies
* yuval levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [0656 21:56]: --- Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How would you feel if your car dealer would tell you that the car is just fine, you only have to remember, every time before you start it, to chew a gum and stick the chewing gum on that little hole from

Re: stack backtrace

2005-06-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 04:27:30PM -0700, Derek Kuli?ski wrote: Hello Kris, Thursday, June 2, 2005, 11:06:54 AM, you wrote: in 1.141 of ffs_softdep.c you added a call to backtrace() if bp-b_vp == NULL..you removed it in current in 1.166, but some people are seeing it trigger on 5.x

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 2 Jun, Charles Swiger wrote: On Jun 2, 2005, at 4:56 PM, yuval levy wrote: If it's a pain to remeber, maybe try sticking something in rc.shutdown? Thank you for trying to help, but I do not find this reply helpful. That's a quick and dirty fix, not a solution. [ ...car analogy

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread yuval levy
--- Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * yuval levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [0656 21:56]: --- Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How would you feel if your car dealer would tell you that the car is just fine, you only have to remember, every time before you start it, to chew a gum and

crash with 5.4-RELEASE-p1

2005-06-02 Thread Mitch Parks
I've now experienced two crashes with 5.4-RELEASE-p1 as outlined below. They appear to be the similar to: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.stable/27608 This is a Dell 2600 dual-xeon with HT disabled, running off of the Dell(AMR) Raid. It has a very mild load with Apache, Postgres, and

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread Matthias Buelow
Don Lewis wrote: Nope, the ext2fs problem is different. It is caused by ext2fs holding persistent references to disk buffers that causes the kernel shutdown code to to think that not all the dirty buffers have been written to disk and skip unmounting all the file systems. Can't that be

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 3 Jun, Matthias Buelow wrote: Don Lewis wrote: Nope, the ext2fs problem is different. It is caused by ext2fs holding persistent references to disk buffers that causes the kernel shutdown code to to think that not all the dirty buffers have been written to disk and skip unmounting all

Re: filesystems not properly unmounted

2005-06-02 Thread Matthias Buelow
Don Lewis wrote: That might help to an extent, but would not eliminate the problem. Any file systems between root and the mount point of the ext2 file system would be busy and would not be able to be unmounted. They would still be marked dirty and would need to be fsck'ed after the reboot.

gmirror rebuild speed limited by value of HZ?

2005-06-02 Thread John Pettitt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've noticed that gmirror seems to rebuild disks by copying 128K every clock tick (or about 12.8 MB/sec on a 100HZ box) - changing HZ to 1000 resulted in my system being limited by the underlying disk controller speed (~ 30MB/sec between FW800