Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?

2005-06-09 Thread Claus Guttesen
Many seasoned unix people have spoken to me about how much more stable FreeBSD is, although at the risk of starting a flame war I'm not convinced that this is still the case, at least not for the 5 series vs Trustix. (vs most linux distributions - sure :D ) I have 9 webservers, two

Re: What to use to get remote display from a amd64 machine?

2005-06-09 Thread Marton Kenyeres
Francois Tigeot wrote: On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:20:03PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 12:03:41 +0200 Francois Tigeot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stock X is sufficient. Well, stock X will probably work. I have used that in the past on a per-program basis. You know, the

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-09 Thread Pete French
Julian H. Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: GCC 3.4.2 on 5.4-RELEASE has a bug for amd64, I started avoiding that by putting CFLAGS= -O0 in /etc/make.conf More info from: Message from

RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to receive

2005-06-09 Thread Goran Gajic
Hi, I have upgraded fresh installed 5.4-RELEASE to 5.4-STABLE today. With 5.4R I was able to mount nfs from another 5.4R box. But after I did cvsup and buildworld and buildkernel today, I'm no longer able to use nfs. This is what I get when I try mount: RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Port mapper

Re: RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to receive

2005-06-09 Thread Dominic Marks
On Thursday 09 June 2005 12:42, Goran Gajic wrote: Hi, RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to receive (jmg: I cc'd you on the off chance you have not seen this already, another user identified your changes as related, but I have not tested this myself.) Yes, it seems that

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?

2005-06-09 Thread Matthias Buelow
Vulpes Velox wrote: I just had to try the USB part... other than having to unmount it and remount it, I had no problems. What did you do? I just tried it again, and get: # umount /dev/da0s1 umount: unmount of /ipod failed: Resource temporarily unavailable And that stays that way, until

Re: 5.4-RELEASE lockups on amd64 SMP

2005-06-09 Thread Matthew Grooms
Max, Not a problem. Looks good so far. Its been up for an hour or a half with all the debug options turned on. I will let it cook in my production environment over the weekend and update you on Monday. Thanks for your help. Matthew Grooms Max Laier wrote: On Thursday 09 June 2005

Re: RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to receive

2005-06-09 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Dominic Marks wrote this message on Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:56 +0100: On Thursday 09 June 2005 12:42, Goran Gajic wrote: Hi, RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to receive (jmg: I cc'd you on the off chance you have not seen this already, another user identified your

RPC: Port mapper failure on 5-STABLE

2005-06-09 Thread Pete French
Just cvsupped from 5.4-RELEASE to this afternoons stable. Did the usual trick of waiting a few minutes and ding it again to make sure I hadnt caught it mid-patch or something. Install everything, all works fine except for NFS. From 'showmount' I get RPC: Port mapper failure no matter what I do.

Re: RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to receive

2005-06-09 Thread Dominic Marks
On Thursday 09 June 2005 16:44, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Dominic Marks wrote this message on Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:56 +0100: On Thursday 09 June 2005 12:42, Goran Gajic wrote: Hi, RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to receive (jmg: I cc'd you on the off chance you

Re: RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to receive

2005-06-09 Thread Dominic Marks
On Thursday 09 June 2005 16:57, Dominic Marks wrote: On Thursday 09 June 2005 16:44, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Dominic Marks wrote this message on Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:56 +0100: On Thursday 09 June 2005 12:42, Goran Gajic wrote: Hi, RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC:

how can I use all the plugins in mozilla

2005-06-09 Thread Maher Mohamed
i instaled the mozilla and the linuxpluginwrapper port but i still get this error messages LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/compat/linux/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so [Shared object libc.so.6 not found, required by nppdf.so] why is that? and what

Re: how can I use all the plugins in mozilla

2005-06-09 Thread Baldur Gislason
You probably have to install a different linux_base. linux_base_rh9 for example. Baldur On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 07:27:03PM +0300, Maher Mohamed wrote: i instaled the mozilla and the linuxpluginwrapper port but i still get this error messages LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-09 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 11:32:53AM +0100, Pete French wrote: Julian H. Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: GCC 3.4.2 on 5.4-RELEASE has a bug for amd64, I started avoiding that by putting CFLAGS= -O0 in /etc/make.conf

Re: how can I use all the plugins in mozilla

2005-06-09 Thread Matthias Buelow
Maher Mohamed wrote: i instaled the mozilla and the linuxpluginwrapper port but i still get this error messages I suggest using plugger, /usr/ports/www/plugger, which handles a lot of plugins. mkb. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to receive

2005-06-09 Thread Goran Gajic
I can also confirm that mount of NFS exports works ok with uipc_socket.c v1.208.2.18 - so there are some problems with v1.208.2.19 Regards, gg. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To

Re: how can I use all the plugins in mozilla

2005-06-09 Thread László Károly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Maher Mohamed wrote: i instaled the mozilla and the linuxpluginwrapper port but i still get this error messages LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/compat/linux/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so [Shared

Re: how can I use all the plugins in mozilla

2005-06-09 Thread Scott Robbins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 08:17:07PM +0200, L?szl? K?roly wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Maher Mohamed wrote: i instaled the mozilla and the linuxpluginwrapper port but i still get this error messages LoadPlugin:

Re: DELL PowerEdge 2850 and FreeBSD 5.4

2005-06-09 Thread Danny Howard
Danny, A late reply, but I had some nasty trouble recently with some dual-Xeon SuperMicros. The install CD would crash and burn, unless I nooted in safe mode. Once I installed FreeBSD I'd have MASSIVE troubles with stability unless I booted in safe mode, which I would use to build an SMP

Re: RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to receive

2005-06-09 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Goran Gajic wrote: I can also confirm that mount of NFS exports works ok with uipc_socket.c v1.208.2.18 - so there are some problems with v1.208.2.19 1.209 introduced a significant bug, so I backed it out as 1.210: revision 1.210 date: 2004/08/20 16:24:23; author:

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-09 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:01:54 +0200 From: Julian H. Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pete French wrote: Julian H. Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: GCC 3.4.2 on 5.4-RELEASE has a bug for amd64, I started avoiding that by putting

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-09 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Thursday 09 June 2005 06:32 am, Pete French wrote: Julian H. Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: GCC 3.4.2 on 5.4-RELEASE has a bug for amd64, I started avoiding that by putting CFLAGS= -O0 in /etc/make.conf More

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-09 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:22:41PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: You can't make the archive search, but Google Groups can (and does) very well. I search the mail list archives far more frequently with Google (or Google Groups) than with the archive search tool. Sure you can..there's a message

Loss of serial ports after upgrade.

2005-06-09 Thread maillist
Hi, I upgraded my 4.6 to 4.10 a while back and no longer have a sio0 or sio1. I've checked the BIOS and my kernel config has the proper lines. Yesterday I cvsuped to 4.11 built and installed a new kernel and world, hoping that might kick it into remembering I have two serial ports, to no avail.

Re: how can I use all the plugins in mozilla

2005-06-09 Thread Jose M Rodriguez
El Jueves, 9 de Junio de 2005 18:27, Maher Mohamed escribió: i instaled the mozilla and the linuxpluginwrapper port but i still get this error messages LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/compat/linux/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf .so [Shared object

Re: Loss of serial ports after upgrade.

2005-06-09 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:54:35 -0500 (CDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I upgraded my 4.6 to 4.10 a while back and no longer have a sio0 or sio1. I've checked the BIOS and my kernel config has the proper lines. Yesterday I cvsuped to 4.11 built and installed

kvm not available

2005-06-09 Thread n0g0013
upon doing a 'netstat -r' i'm getting the message netstat: kvm not available Routing tables rt_tables: symbol not in namelist i assume i have removed a critical kernel option -- any ideas? current kernel config attached. tia, -- t t w # #

Re: Loss of serial ports after upgrade.

2005-06-09 Thread maillist
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Kevin Oberman wrote: ... Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:54:35 -0500 (CDT) ... From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... ... ... Hi, ... ... I upgraded my 4.6 to 4.10 a while back and no longer have a sio0 or sio1. ... I've checked the BIOS and my kernel config has

Re: kvm not available

2005-06-09 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:40:27PM +0100, n0g0013 wrote: upon doing a 'netstat -r' i'm getting the message netstat: kvm not available Routing tables rt_tables: symbol not in namelist i assume i have removed a critical kernel option -- any ideas? You removed device mem.

nfs and kqueue udp sockets broken (now fixed!)

2005-06-09 Thread John-Mark Gurney
I broke NFS with the commits of 1.208.2.19 (RELENG_5) and 1.68.2.26 (RELENG_4) to src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c, so, if you have either of those revisions, please upgrade. This bug is now fixed. It was broken for the last 2.5 days. Sorry for this disruption. Now back to your regularly scheduled

Re: Strange TCP-related hang on startup w/ recent CVSUP

2005-06-09 Thread Terry Kennedy
Just to close this out, this was caused by the uipc_socket.c change that also broke NFS. All better now... Terry Kennedy http://www.tmk.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] New York, NY USA ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

UFS2 partition with negative used space

2005-06-09 Thread Jean-Yves Lefort
Hi, Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1e989M-46M956M-5%/var/tmp Any hints? -- Jean-Yves Lefort [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lefort.be.eu.org/ pgpUZfbMliJgC.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: UFS2 partition with negative used space

2005-06-09 Thread David Adam
(The mail to this node is rather slow, so I'm sure someone else will have replied by now.) On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Jean-Yves Lefort wrote: Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1e989M-46M956M-5%

Re: UFS2 partition with negative used space

2005-06-09 Thread Jean-Yves Lefort
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:32:04 +0800 (WST) David Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Jean-Yves Lefort wrote: Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1e989M-46M956M-5% /var/tmp

Re: UFS2 partition with negative used space

2005-06-09 Thread David Adam
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1e989M-46M956M-5% /var/tmp /me reads again. Whoa. In that case, I have no idea. Sorry for

Re: UFS2 partition with negative used space

2005-06-09 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:32:04AM +0800, David Adam wrote: (The mail to this node is rather slow, so I'm sure someone else will have replied by now.) On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Jean-Yves Lefort wrote: Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on

Re: UFS2 partition with negative used space

2005-06-09 Thread Suleiman Souhlal
Hi, On Jun 9, 2005, at 10:22 PM, Jean-Yves Lefort wrote: Hi, Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1e989M-46M956M -5%/var/tmp Any hints? During a private discussion I had with Jean-Yves, we

Re: UFS2 partition with negative used space

2005-06-09 Thread Xin LI
Hi, Suleiman, 2005-06-09 23:35 -0400Suleiman Souhlal Hi, [...] It used to be recomputed by the kernel at mount time if the filesystem was dirty, but delphij changed it so that background fsck recomputes it instead. For some reason, in this case, this wasn't enough to synchronize the

Re: UFS2 partition with negative used space

2005-06-09 Thread Julien Gabel
Hi, Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1e989M-46M956M-5% /var/tmp Any hints? I had to run fsck(8) on /tmp, which was in the same state as shown here, three time in the last five months. --

Re: UFS2 partition with negative used space

2005-06-09 Thread Xin LI
Hi, Julien, 2005-06-10 07:09 +0200Julien Gabel Hi, Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1e989M-46M956M-5% /var/tmp Any hints? I had to run fsck(8) on /tmp, which was in the same state