On Fri, 2006-Mar-24 10:00:20 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Ok. The next test is to NOT do umount/remount and then use a data set
that is ~2x system memory (but can still be mmap'd by grep). Rerun
the data set multiple times using grep and grep --mmap.
The results here are weird.
On Saturday 25 March 2006 02:29, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
I updated my system (which was happy on Feb. 15 code) to March 13 code
and I am still running fine. No errors at all. Also, another system was
updated to RELENG_6 yesterday and it is also running clean.
Again, all systems are
On Fri, 2006-Mar-24 15:18:00 -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
which there is not with the read. Read also requires fairly large buffers in
the user space to be efficient -- *in addition* to the buffers in the kernel.
I disagree. With a filesystem read, the kernel is solely responsible
for
在 Saturday 25 March 2006 18:04，JoaoBR 写道：
It appears to be a point
the machines with problem are all SMP, UP do no show the nve timeout or any
other problem with it
alias, same with SK, on SMP the system crashes and with UP it's ok
João
Mine is UP, chipset is NForce3 250GB, current it
This happens w/o any real activity on that interface (which goes into
an Allied Telesyn switch):
...
Mar 24 19:39:54 worf kernel: nve0: device timeout (1)
Mar 24 19:39:54 worf kernel: nve0: link state changed to DOWN
Mar 24 19:39:55 worf kernel: nve0: link state changed to UP
Mar 24
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, David Xu wrote:
ÿÿ Saturday 25 March 2006 18:04ÿÿJoaoBR ÿÿ
It appears to be a point
the machines with problem are all SMP, UP do no show the nve timeout or any
other problem with it
alias, same with SK, on SMP the system crashes and with UP it's ok
For sk please try
How can i connect to my usb router?
--
Mohamed M. Maher
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 25 March 2006 05:39 am, Peter Jeremy wrote:
= On Fri, 2006-Mar-24 15:18:00 -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
= which there is not with the read. Read also requires fairly large
= buffers in the user space to be efficient -- *in addition* to the
= buffers in the kernel.
=
= I disagree.
AFAIK, it's still impossible to connect any human body to the Internet via
USB routers. :)
Be more descriptive: show your 'uname -sr', usb-related parts of dmesg,
router model, what do you wish to have as a result, etc.
2006/3/25, Maher Mohamed [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How can i connect to my usb
In doing a cvsup I've run into the following error. I have seen this same
error show up over the last few days.
Thoughts?
-Troy
Server warning: RCS file error in
/usr/local/etc/cvsup/prefixes/FreeBSD.cvs/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/nfsmb/Makefile,v:
1: head expected
Marian Hettwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug Ambrisko wrote:
Stephan Koenig writes:
| Does anyone know of an easy way to get temperature information out of
| a Dell PowerEdge 1550/1650/1750/1850/2650/2850 running FreeBSD4/5/6?
|
| Something that has a very simple CLI that just outputs
:The results here are weird. With 1GB RAM and a 2GB dataset, the
:timings seem to depend on the sequence of operations: reading is
:significantly faster, but only when the data was mmap'd previously
:There's one outlier that I can't easily explain.
:...
:Peter Jeremy
Really odd. Note that
Mikhail Teterin wrote this message on Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 09:20 -0500:
= The downside is that touching an uncached page triggers a trap which may
= not be as efficient as reading a block of data through the filesystem
= interface, and I/O errors are delivered via signals (which may not be as
On Sat, 2006-Mar-25 10:29:17 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Really odd. Note that if your disk can only do 25 MBytes/sec, the
calculation is: 2052167894 / 25MB = ~80 seconds, not ~60 seconds
as you would expect from your numbers.
systat was reporting 25-26 MB/sec. dd'ing the
On Sat, 2006-Mar-25 09:20:13 -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
I'm sorry, that should be http://aldan.algebra.com/~mi/mzip.c -- I checked
this time :-(
It doesn't look like it's doing anything especially weird. As Matt
pointed out, creating files with mmap() is not a good idea because the
syncer
I am having a problem with the isp driver seeing a StorageTek disk
array LUNs. I am directly attaching to the array and everything works
find as long as I plug into the A controller on the array. When I
connect up to the B controller, I can not see any of the LUNs
advertised. The QLogic
On Fri, 2006-Mar-24 15:18:00 -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On the machine, where both mzip and the disk run at only 50%, the disk is a
plain SATA drive (mzip's state goes from RUN to vnread and back).
...
18 usersLoad 0.46 0.53 0.60 24 ??? 15:15
Mem:KBREAL
Run sysinstall, custom, distributions
select minimal
No [x] appears.
Selecting custom indicates items were selected.
Seems to be one of the March 8th commits (sam)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
18 matches
Mail list logo
